Article
Article name Readiness of Teachers to Ensure Psychological Safety in the Context of Distance Learning
Authors Skorova L.V. Candidate of Psychology, Associate Professor, larisa.skorova@gmail.com
Kachimskaya A.Y. Candidate of Psychology, max115221@list.ru
Bibliographic description Skorova L. V., Kachimskaya A. Yu. Readiness of Teachers to Ensure Psychological Safety in the Context of Distance Learning // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. 2020. Vol. 15, No. 4. PP. 145–152. DOI: 10.21209/2658-7114-2020-15-4-145-152.
Section Pedagogical Psychology
UDK 378.016
DOI 10.21209/2658-7114-2020-15-4-145-152
Article type
Annotation The relevance of the study is due to the need to find ways to ensure the psychological safety of distance educational environment, as well as the lack of development of characteristics and safety indicators of the educational process during distance learning at school. The main research methods were theoretical methods aimed at creating theoretical generalizations, determining the content of teachers’ readiness to ensure psychological safety in the context of distance learning and empirical methods that identify the main components of readiness using a research methodology.The article discusses the results of a study of the readiness of teachers to ensure psychological safety in the context of distance learning in three components: a) the operational component, which is represented by communicative, constructive and gnostic skills that determine the teacher’s behavior in ensuring safe and comfortable interaction with distance learning; b) the reflexive component involves understanding the problem of safe-comfortable interaction in the context of distance learning and identifying ways to solve it based on introspection of one’s activities; c) the activity component is represented by the personal experience of the teacher in using special ways of working with students to ensure psychological safety in the distance educational environment. The conditions for teaching teachers to develop their competence to ensure the psychological safety of distance learning environments are defined: mastering the methods of organizing the educational process, ways to maintain the self-organization of the educational process, building an individual motivational system for the student and emotional support in real distance learning.
Key words psychological safety, distance learning, willingness of the teacher to ensure psychological safety, interaction, space of distance interaction
Article information
References 1. Alekseev, S. V., Uskova, S. A. Maintenance of professional and pedagogical activities of a teacher: conceptual field and essential characteristics. Fundamental researches, no. 2–17, pp. 3807–3811, 2015. (In Rus.) 2. Bogutskaya, T. V. Understanding of education as an event. The world of science, culture and education, no. 5, pp. 233–236, 2007. (In Rus.) 3. Baeva, I. A. Safe educational environment: psychological and pedagogical foundations of formation, maintenance and evaluation. SPb: LOIRO, 2014. (In Rus.) 4. Baeva, I. A. Psychological safety of the educational environment in the structure of the integrated security of the educational organization. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, no. 6, pp. 12–17, 2017. (In Rus.) 5. Vetrova, Ya. A., Shchegolenkova, E. S. The problem of psychological safety of the educational environment of the municipal education system. Native and foreign pedagogy, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 2018. (In Rus.) 6. Gorshkova, V. V., Uskova, S. A. Conceptual signs of the competence of the subject of education in conditions of social uncertainty. Human and education, no. 2, pp. 4–9, 2018. (In Rus.) 7. Dneprov, S. A. Ergonomic aspects of the activity of the pedagogue in the new learning environment. Mir nauki. Pedagogy and Psychology, no. 5, p.5, 2019. (In Rus.) 8. Zakharova, T. N., Androsova, M. I. Psychological safety of the educational environment of students. Kontsept, no. 26, pp. 67–70, 2017. (In Rus.) 9. Kabachenko, T. S. Violation of psychological safety in the context of professional activity: Dr. sci. diss. abstr. M., 2000 (In Rus.) 10. Kuzmina, N. V. Methods of research of pedagogical activity. M: Progress. 1984. (In Rus.) 11. Molokostova, A. M., Yakimanskaya, I. S. Socio-psychological aspects of the safety of the educational environment and the subjective well-being of specialists in helping professions. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, no. 2, pp. 189–193, 2015. (In Rus.) 12. Luzanova, N. N. The main aspects of preparing a teacher for the organization of distance learning at school. Continuing education, no. 3, pp. 46–48, 2017. (In Rus.) 13. Lukiyanova, M. I. Theoretical analysis of the phenomenon of teacher readiness for the implementation of a personality-oriented approach in the conceptual field of the category «Professional pedagogical activity». Pedagogical Sciences, no. 4, pp. 110–123, 2017. (In Rus.) 14. Rassokha, N. G. Representations of the psychological safety of the educational environment of the school and the types of interpersonal relationships of its participants: Cand. sci. diss.SPb., 2005. (In Rus.) 15. Sokolova, I. I., Piskunova, E. V., Sergienko, A. Yu. Research on the readiness of young teachers for professional activities in the light of the standards and requirements of the employer. Human and education, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2015. (In Rus.) 16. Uskova, S. A. Professional and pedagogical competence of a teacher as an indicator of readiness for the design and implementation of the modern educational process. Human and education, no. 2, pp. 69– 75, 2019. (In Rus.) 17. Ushakov, A. A. The professionalism of the teacher as a determinant of improving the quality of educational services in the context of the competitive ability of the secondary vocational education system. Bulletin of the Adyghe State University, no. 1, pp. 146–152, 2012. (In Rus.) 18. Khitryuk, V. V. The willingness of teachers to work in an inclusive education. Bulletin of ChGPU named after I.Ya. Yakovleva, no. 3, pp. 189–194, 2013. (In Rus.) 19. Shteinmets, A. E. Psychological preparation for pedagogical activity. Kaluga: KGPU, 1998. (In Rus.) 20. Bas, S., Tabancali, E. Correlations between teachers’ personality, psychological safety perception and teacher Voice. Eurasian Journal of Reseach, vol. 85, pp. 185–204, 2020. DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2020.85.9. (In Engl.) 21. Honingh, M., Hooge, E. The effect of school-leader support and participation in decision making on teacher collaboration in Dutch primary and secondary schools. Educational management administration & leadership, vol. 42, pp. 75–98, 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1741143213499256. (In Engl.) 22. Morkey, E., Rossman, S. B. Safe schools: Policies and practice. Education and Urban Society, no. 28, pp.1–18, 1996. (In Engl.) 23. Sautter, R. C. Standing up to violence [Special report]. Phi Delta Kappan, no. 76, K1-K12, 1995. (In Engl.)
Full articleReadiness of Teachers to Ensure Psychological Safety in the Context of Distance Learning