| Annotation |
The relevance of the study is due to the need to transform teaching practices under the conditions of digital education environment. The article deals with the features of formation of digital culture of college students as subjects of activity in a context of the concept of digital innovations. The methodological basis of the research has been formed by means of the subject-active approach to the study of digital culture of college students as subjects of professional formation. Theoretical basis of the research is the concept of mastering professional activities as a process of problem solving, the theory of self-moderation, as the formation of digital culture of the subject is associated with communication in a social network in the presence of a certain competence, allowing the autonomous accomplishment of tasks. To achieve the goal, the following theoretical methods of research have been used: analysis, generalization, extrapolation; empirical methods: questionnaires aimed at revealing students’ knowledge about digital culture; analysis of peculiarities of forms of project training implementation within the framework of gamification concept. The analysis of the influence of digital technologies on the content of the college students’ training is given. It is proved that the development of an average professional in the Industrial 4.0 paradigm implies the inclusion of robotics, big data, modeling, additive technologies, industrial Internet of things, augmented reality, cloud computing, etc. in the content of education. Conclusions. Integration of digital technologies into all aspects of the educational sphere requires serious changes in the content, methods, forms, means of education; into the culture as a world of senses of the subjects of educational activity; into the principles of creation of innovative sites on the basis of educational organizations of SPT; in the structure of the educational process. It was concluded that the development of digital culture of the students of the College of Culture can become the technological and value foundation of professional education.
|
| References |
1. Blinov, V. I., Dulinov, M. V., Esenina, E. Yu., Sergeev, I. S. Draft didactic concept for digital vocational education and training. M: Publishing house «Pero», 2019. (In Rus.)
2. Galkin, D. V. Digital culture: methodological issues of research on cultural dynamics from digital automata to techno-biotheses. International Journal of Cultural Research, no. 3, 2012. (In Rus.)
3. Gordeeva, T. O. Theory of Self-Determination by E. Dessi and R. Ryan. Psychology of Motivation Achievement. M: Smysl; Publishing center “Akademiya”, 2006. (In Rus.)
4. Elkina, E. E. Digital Culture as an Area of Interdisciplinary Research: Methodological Approaches and Trends. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, pp. 67–78, no. 12, 2018. (In Rus.)
5. Zorina, O. Yu., Povorina, E. V. Gamification as a phenomenon of the modern world. New generation, pp. 73–79, no. 9, 2016. (In Rus.)
6. Methodology for the development of the economy, industry and services under conditions of digitalization. SPb: Politekh-Press, 2018. (In Rus.)
7. Pasko, I. What to know about Industry 4.0 and the Internet of. The Runet. Web. 15.12.2019. http://www.therunet.com/articles/4826 (In Rus.)
8. Podvoiskiy, G. L. Role of new technologies in the economy of the XXI century. New Economy World, pp. 6–15, no. 4, 2016. (In Rus.)
9. Politov, A. V. Representation of human consciousness in modern digital computer technocratic culture. Technologos, pp. 54–60, no. 2, 2017. (In Rus.)
10. The subject’s problem in psychological science. M: Publishing house «Akademical project», 2000. (In Rus.)
11. Shvab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. M: Publishing house «E», 2017. (In Rus.)
12. Erdyneeva, K. G. Professional identity in the era of knowledge economy. Contemporary problems of science. Proceedings of the Russian national scientific conference with international participation. AmGU: Blagoveshchensk. 2017: 120–123. (In Rus.)
13. Erdyneeva, K. G., Klimenko, T. K., Bordonskaya, L. A., Igumnova, E. A., Levdanskaya, Yu. Yu. University as a subject of the region in development: methodological approaches, principles. Scientific Notes of the Transbaikal State University, no. 1, pp. 6–16, 2019. (In Rus.)
14. Erdyneeva, K. G., Tsyrenov, V. Ts. Suicidal ideation of cyber-bullying in teenagers. Scientific Survey. Series 2: Humanities, pp. 55–68, no. 4–5, 2018. (In Rus.)
15. Abele, E. Industry 4.0: The Computerization of Manufacturing. http://www.tekniker.es/en/industry-4-0-thecomputerization-of-manufacturing (In Engl.)
16. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. The concept of flow NIMM “Flow Theory and Research”. Oxford Handbook of Positive, 2009: 195–206. (In Engl.)
17. Pérez-Manzano A., Almela-Baeza J. Gamification and Transmedia for Scientific Promotion and for Encouraging Scientific Careers in Adolescents. Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal, pp. 93–103, no. 55, Jan. 2018. (In Engl.)
18. Perrotta, C., Featherstone, G., Aston, H., & Houghton, E. Game-based learning: Latest evidence
and future directions. (NFER Psychology, pp. 195-206, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0018 Research Programme: Innovation in Education). Slough: NFER. (https://goo.gl/D6cmdq). (In Engl.)
19. SabaiKhin, author, & Theresa CF Ho, author. Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, no. 2, pp. 177, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2018-0083. (In Engl.)
20. Zahra, N. A. I., & Alanazi, A. A. Digital Childhood: the Impact of Using Digital Technology on Children’s Health. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Allied Sciences, no. 8, pp. 144–154, 2019. (In Engl.) |
