Article
Article name Psychological Qualities of Person as a Subject of Human-Animal Interaction
Authors Shukova G.V. Candidate of Psychology, Senior Research Assistant,, shookova@yandex.ru
Grigorieva M.I. Research Assistant, ecopsymig@gmail.com
Bibliographic description
Section General Psychology, Personality Psychology
UDK 159.9
DOI
Article type
Annotation In modern psychology Human-Animal Interaction is identified as a main area of research. Psychology of Human-Animal Interaction was analyzed; several future steps in HAI research were suggested: category interaction is the basic foundation of modeling mechanisms Human-Animal Interaction. In Russian psychology the works on the psychological aspects of human interspecies communication are rare. Based on the analysis of paradigmatic foundations of psychology interspecific interactions, the prospects of development of research practices in the field of cross-species perspective are outlined: interaction category in a study of inter-specific human relationships, i. e. collaboration and communication, is the basic foundation of modeling mechanisms of Human-Animal Interaction. Using methods of questionnaires from the field of eco-psychological and psycho-semantic approaches to the study of personality, it was showed that the basis of man’s conscious choice of pet-interaction there is its need for positioning the animal as a subject. In the personal sphere of petowners, the orientation to a particular type of communication is determined, which can be characterized as a socio-positive and innovative. The author specially accentuated the absence of directional compensation component, the postulated deficit model of pet-relations, according to which the pet’s role is reduced to compensate / stagnation of owner’s personal problems. In the present study, the needs and personal characteristics of dog’s owners (n = 44) and non-owners (n = 39) are compared. It was revealed that some needs and personal characteristics are significant predictors of attitude and behavior type with animals.
Key words human-animal interaction, pet-attitude, subjective relation, personality factor.
Article information
References 1. Derjabo S. D., Jasvin V. A. Metodiki diagnostiki i korrekcii otnoshenija k prirode. M.: CKFL RAO, 1995. 147 s. 2. Krivolapchuk N. D. Prikladnaja psihologija sobaki: ucheb. posobie. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2008. 560 s. 3. Petrenko V. F. Psihosemantika soznanija: avtoref. … d-ra psihol. nauk. M., 1989. 48 с. 4. Shmelev A. G. Psihodiagnostika lichnostnyh chert. SPb.: Rech’, 2002. 480 s. 5. Shukova G. V. Mezhvidovoe vzaimodejstvie cheloveka i domashnih zhivotnyh kak predmet jekopsihologicheskogo issledovanija // Jekopsihologicheskie issledovanija – 3: sb. nauch. st. / pod red. V. I. Panova. M.: FGNU PI RAO: SPb.: Nestor-Istorija, 2013. S. 76–109. 6. Animals in our lives: Human-animal interaction in family, community, and therapeutic settings. (2011). Eds. P. McCardle, S. McCune, J. A. Griffin, L. Esposito, & L. S. Freund. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company. 7. Buttelmann D., &Römpke A.-K. (2014). Anxiety-Reducing Effect: Dog, Fish and Plant in Direct Comparison // Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals. V. 27. № 2. P. 267–277. 8. Downey H., & Ellis S. (2008)Tails of animal attraction: incorporating the feline into the family // Journal of Business Research. V. 61. № 5. P. 434–441. 9. Feuerbacher E. N., & Wynne C. D. L. (2012). Relative efficacy of human social interaction and food as reinforcers for domestic dogs and hand-reared wolves // Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. V. 98. № 1. P. 105–129. 10. Horowitz A.C., &Bekoff M. (2007). Naturalizing anthropomorphism: behavioral prompts to our humanizing of animals //Anthrozoös: Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals. V. 20. № 1. R. 23–35. 11. Hosey G., &Melfi V. (2014). Human-animal interactions, relationships and bonds: a review and analysis of the literature // International Journal of Comparative Psychology. V. 27. № 1. P. 117–142. 12. Hurley K. B. (2014). Development and Human-Animal Interaction // Human Development. V. 57. № 1. www.karger.com/Article/FullText/357795 (data obrashhenija: 16.05.2014). 13. Kavanagh P. S., Signal T. D., & Taylor N. (2013). The Dark Triad and animal cruelty: Dark personalities, dark attitudes, and dark behaviors // Personality and Individual Differences. V. 55. № 6. P. 666–670. 14. Marinelli L., Adamelli S., Normando S., & Bono G. (2007). Quality of life of the pet dog: Influence of owner and dog’s characteristics // Applied Animal Behaviour Science. V. 108. P. 143–156. 15. Mueller M. K. (2014). The Relationship between Types of Human–Animal Interaction and Attitudes about Animals: An Exploratory Study // Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals. V. 27. № 2. P. 295–308. 16. Oyama M. A., &Serpell J. A. (2013). General Commentary: Rethinking the role of animals in human well-being // Front. Psychol. 25. June.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/ fpsyg.2013.00374/full (data obrashhenija: 17.05.2014). 17. Titeux E., Péron F., & Gilbert C. (2013). La relation homme-chein: nouvelleshypothéses // Le Point Vétérinaire. № 336. P. 64–70. 18. Vitztum C. (2013). Human-Animal Interaction: A Concept Analysis // International Journal of Nursing Knowledge. V. 24. № 1. P. 30–36
Full articlePsychological Qualities of Person as a Subject of Human-Animal Interaction