| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
On the Problem of Diagnosis of Occupation Commitment |
| Authors |
Kalashnikov A.I. Postgraduate Student, a.i.kalashnikov@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
|
| Section |
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, ACMEOLOGY |
| UDK |
159.9.072:331.54 |
| DOI |
|
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
The article raises the problem of studying and diagnosis of professional commitment, the existing psychological questionnaires for diagnosis are more focused on studying organizational commitment rather than occupation commitment. In this connection, organizational commitment phenomenon is considered; the content and specificity of existing foreign models of organizational commitment are described: the model of commitment developed by L. Potter and colleagues, the model of commitment developed by J. H. Meyer and Allen, the model of commitment developed by Y. Wang. The article also reveals the psychological questionnaires that are developed on the basis of the models listed above. Potter’s model of organizational commitment was developed in the organizational commitment questionnaire (OCQ), and three-component model of John. H. Meyer and Allen – in the organizational commitment scale (OCS). Meyer and Allen’s three-component model of organizational commitment was described in the context of occupation commitment; the authors disclosed the contents of the selected components: affective occupation commitment, continuous occupation commitment, normative occupation commitment. The article reveals usage of the occupation commitment scale developed by J. Bagraim, and includes its translation. The article states that the available Russian methods of studying the commitment are limited by two options – the scale of employee’s loyal attitude to organization (L. G. Pochebut, O. E. Korolev) and methods of measuring loyalty (S. S. Baranskaia).
|
| Key words |
occupation commitment, professional commitment, professional loyalty, diagnostics of commitment. |
| Article information |
|
| References |
1. Artemova Ya. V. Issledovanie otnosheniya sotrudnika k kompanii v kontekste loyal’nosti i stazha raboty // Aktual’nye voprosy sovremennoi psikhologii: materialy mezhdunar. nauch. konf. Chelyabinsk, 2011. S. 5–7.
2. Baranskaya S. S. Metodika izmereniya loyal’nosti [Elektronnyi resurs] // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: elektron. nauch. zhurn. 2011. № 1(15). Rezhim dostupa: http//psystudy.ru/num (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.2015).
3. Germanov I. A., Plotnikova E. B. Izmerenie organizatsionnoi loyal’nosti personala (opyt aprobatsii metodiki Meier – Allen) // Vestn. Perm. un-ta. Ser. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. 2011. № 3. S. 107–111.
4. Gretsov A. G., Azbel’ A. A. Uznai sebya. Psikhologicheskie testy dlya podrostkov. SPb.: Piter, 2006. S. 143–155.
5. Dominyak V. I. Organizatsionnaya loyal’nost’: model’ realizatsii ozhidanii rabotnika ot svoei organizatsii: dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk: 19.00.05. SPb., 2006. 281 s.
6. Ermolaeva E. P. Professional’naya identichnost’ i marginalizm: kontseptsiya i real’nost’ (stat’ya pervaya) // Psikhol. zhurn. 2001. T. 22. № 4. S. 51–59.
7. Magura M. I. Patriotizm personala po otnosheniyu k svoei organizatsii – reshayushchee konkurentnoe preimushchestvo // Upravlenie personalom. 1998. № 11. S. 20–28.
8. Minyurova S. A. Modelirovanie protsessa formirovaniya organizatsionnoi priverzhennosti u studentov v usloviyakh universitetskogo obrazovaniya // Formirovanie grazhdanina i professionalista v usloviyakh universitetskogo obrazovaniya: sb. nauch. st. Gabrovo: Eks-Pres, 2013. Kn. 2. S. 145–150.
9. Minyurova S. A., Novikova O. V. Osobennosti organizatsionnoi priverzhennosti u shkol’nykh pedagogov // Psikhologiya i shkola. 2012. № 2. S. 30–33.
10. Rodygina U. S. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti professional’noi identichnosti studentov // Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2007. № 4. S. 49.
11. Stavropol’tseva E. A. Formirovanie organizatsionnoi loyal’nosti u studentov pedago-gicheskogo vuza // Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 2014. № 2. C. 43–48.
12. Allen N. J., Meyer J. P. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization // Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1990. Vol. 63. Issue 1. P. 1–18.
13. Bagraim J. The Dimensionality of professional commitment. SA // Journal of Industrial Psychology. 2003, Vol. 29(2). P. 6–9.
14. Jaros S. Meyer and Allen Model of Organizational Commitment: Measurement Issues. The ICFAI // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2007. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 7–25.
15. Kanning P., Hill A. Validation of the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ) in six Languages // Journal of business and media psychology. 2013. Vol. 4. Issue 2. P. 11–20.
16. LaMastro V. Commitment and perceived organizational support [Электронный ресурс] // National forum of applied education research journal. 1999. Vol. 12. No. 3. Режим доступа: http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic (дата обращения: 10.01.2015).
17. Meyer J. P., Allen N. J., Smith C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of a three component conceptualization // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1993. Vol. 78 (4). P. 538–551.
18. Mowday R. T., Steers R. M., Potter L. W. The Measurement of Organizational Commitment // Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1979. Vol. 14. P. 224–247.
19. Wang Y. Observations on the organizational commitment of Chinese employees: comparative studies of state-owned enterprises and foreign-invested enterprises // International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2004. Vol. 15. P. 649–649.
20. Wong A. Evaluation of Organizational Commitment Models and their components in Asian Cities // International Journal of Human Resource Studies. 2014. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 66–96.
21. Yang L., Yang H., Chen H. A study of nurses’ job satisfaction: The relationship to professional commitment and friendship networks // Health. 2012. Vol. 4. No. 11. P. 109–110. |
| Full article | On the Problem of Diagnosis of Occupation Commitment |
