| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
Diagnosis of Personality as a Factor in the Success of Training in High School |
| Authors |
Bilgaeva N.T. Candidate of Technique, Associate Professor, bnts828@mail.ruChimitova E.G. Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor, chimitova@gmail.com |
| Bibliographic description |
Bilgaeva N. Ts., Chimitova E. G. Diagnosis of Personality as a Factor in the Success of Training in High School // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. Series Pedagogical Sciences. 2018. Vol. 13, No. 6. PP. 71–78. |
| Section |
THEORY AND METHODOLOGY OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION |
| UDK |
37.012 |
| DOI |
|
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
The article analyzes the results of a diagnostic study of students, conducted in conjunction
with the Research Institute for Monitoring the Quality of Education in Yoshkar-Ola. These studies
included the diagnosis of the motivational component according to the method of S. A. Pakulina
and S. M. Ketko, adapted and modified for students of all training profiles; diagnostics of mentalabilities with the help of R. Amthauer’s intelligence test, which determines the structure of verbal, mathematical and spatial intelligence; diagnosis of personality traits using a five-factor personal questionnaire. In the diagnostic study, five hundred freshmen from the ESSUTM took part. Diagnosis has shown that a high level of motivational component and personal qualities does not indicate a high verbal, mathematical and spatial intelligence. It is the indicator of the structure of intelligence that is most important for successful training in areas related to the preparation of bachelors in the field of information technology. Analysis of the results of the study of students in the two areas of “Software Engineering” and “Mathematical Support and Administration of Information Systems” confirmed these findings, as the dropout for three years (2015–2018) in these areas of training amounted to about 30 % of the total number of the first course. The results of the diagnosis of the freshmen of the ESSUTM allowed to assess students as subjects of educational activity, to determine their readiness to continue their studies and to monitor the educational achievements for a number of years.
|
| Key words |
indicators of intellectual abilities; diagnosis of motivation for learning; diagnosis of personality; corrective measures |
| Article information |
|
| References |
1. Anastazi A., Urbina S. Psihologicheskoe testirovanie. 7-e izd. SPb.: Piter, 2007. 688 s.
2. Anastazi A. Differencial’naya psihologiya. Individual’nye i gruppovye razlichiya v povedenii: per. s angl. M.: Aprel’-Press: Eksmo-Press, 2001. 752 s.
3. Belocerkovskij A. V. Rossijskoe vysshee obrazovanie: o vyzovah i riskah // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2012. № 7. S. 3–9.
4. Bil’gaeva N. C., Chimitova E. G. Upravlenie kachestvom obrazovaniya na osnove diagnosticheskih issledovanij // Vestnik BGU. Obrazovanie. Lichnost’. Obshchestvo. 2016. Vyp. 2. S. 51–56.
5. Bil’gaeva N. C., Chimitova E. G. Problemy effektivnogo upravleniya obrazovaniem: sb. nauch.-metod. st. Ulan-Ude: VSGTU, 2008. T. 2, vyp. 15. S. 22–25.
6. Bogoslovskaya O. Motivaciya polucheniya vysshego obrazovaniya v kontekste vybora professii // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2006. № 5. S. 44–47.
7. Ket’ko S. M., Pakulina S. A., Pominov A. V. Edinstvo refleksii, motivacii i adaptacii v soznanii lichnosti. Chelyabinsk: Filial Mosk. gos. ped. un-ta, 2005. 232 s.
8. Saganenko G. I., Stepancova A. A., Stepanova E. I. Professional’nye predpochteniya molodyozhi kak pokazatel’ obshchestvennyh peremen // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2015. № 2. S. 59–70.
9. Selezneva N. A. Kachestvo vysshego obrazovaniya kak ob»ekt sistemnogo issledovaniya. M.: Issledovatel’skij centr problem kachestva podgotovki specialistov, 2008. 95 s.
10. Seryakova S. B., Krasinskaya L. F. Reforma vysshego obrazovaniya glazami prepodavatelej: rezul’taty issledovaniya // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2013. № 11. S. 22–30.
11. Faktorovich A. A. Cennostno-motivacionnyj podhod k upravleniyu kachestvom obrazovaniya v vuze // Pedagogika. 2011. № 4. S. 52–64. |
| Full article | Diagnosis of Personality as a Factor in the Success of Training in High School |
