References |
1. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, K. A. Activity and consciousness of the individual as a subject of activity. Personality Psychology in a socialist society. Activity and personality development, vol.1, no. 6, p. 14, 1989. (In Rus.)
2. Antonova, M. O. Raising social activity of high school students in a small rural school. Diss. cand. ped. Scien. Kostroma, 2004. (In Rus.)
3. Bartenev, A. N. The development of entrepreneurial activity of college students in the process of industrial training. Diss. cand. ped. Scien. Moscow, 2008. (In Rus.)
4. Belyaev, L. N. Humanitarian technologies and the humanities in the aspect of training a modern specialist. Bulletin of the Herzen University, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2008. (In Rus.)
5. Biryukova, T. A. Motivational means of developing the creative activity of the individual. Diss. cand. ped. scien. Novosibirsk, 2005. (In Rus.)
6. Bondarevskaya, A. I. Cultural and educational space of the university as an environment of professional and personal self-development of students. Diss. cand. ped. scien. Rostov-on-Don, 2004.
7. Valitskaya, A. P. Humanitarian technologies and competence-based approach in the context of innovation (anthropo-philosophical view). Bull. Vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 29–33, 2007. (In Rus.)
8. Goncharov, S. A. Humanitarian technologies in education and social sphere. Vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 9–15, 2008. (In Rus.)
9. Dralyuk, I. A. Project activities as a means of educating students’ social activity. Abstract diss. cand. ped. scien. Saratov, 2005. 23 p. (In Rus.)
10. Eliseeva, O. P. Formation of professionally important qualities of a social teacher in the educational process of the college. Diss. cand. ped. scien. Moscow, 2005. (In Rus.)
11. Zherebyatnikova, G. V. Formation of creative activity of future teachers in the educational space of a modern university. Diss. cand. ped. scien. Chita, 2013. (In Rus.)
12. Ignatov, I. B, Sushkova, L. N. Project technologies as a teaching method: historical and pedagogical analysis. Theory and practice of social development, no. 1, pp. 164–167, 2011. (In Rus.)
13. Igumnova, E. A., Radetskaya, I. V. Quest technology in the context of the requirements of the FSES of general education. Modern problems of science and education, no. 6, p. 313, 2016. (In Rus.)
14. Kandalina, E. M. The development of social activity of students in the socio-cultural activities of the pedagogical college. Diss. cand. ped. scien. Chelyabinsk, 2005. (In Rus.)
15. Kurilova, S. Yu. Project training as an innovative technology organization of the educational process. Scientific problems of humanitarian studies, pp. 47–53, no. 11, 2009. (In Rus.)
16. Leushkanova, S. V. Influence of the semantic sphere of personality on the manifestation of creative activity in the activity. Diss. cand. ped. scien. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 2005. (In Rus.)
17. Markina, N. V. The ratio of situational and suprasituational manifestations of activity in gifted students. Diss. cand. ped. scien. Moscow, 2003. (In Rus.)
18. Nikolaev, A. A. Social activity as a factor in the formation of the civic identity of modern Russian students. Diss. cand. ped. scien. Orel, 2010. (In Rus.)
19. Novozhilov, A. E. Development of the creative potential of entrepreneurship. Diss. cand. ped. scien. Yekaterinburg, 2006. (In Rus.)
20. Polat, E. S. Pedagogical distance learning technologies. M: Academy, 2008. (In Rus.)
21. Solonshchikova, T. V. Formation of social and professional activity of a student of a technical college in the conditions of reforming civil society. Diss. cand. ped. scien. Kazan, 2007. (In Rus.)
22. Solomin, V. P. Humanitarian technologies as an innovation in education. Bulletin of TSPU, no. 4, pp. 124–127, 2011. (In Rus.)
23. Suvorov, S. A. The development of the experience of creative interaction of younger teens in the school class. Diss. cand. ped. scien. St. Petersburg, 2010. (In Rus.)
24. Solovyov, Yu. A. Formation of students’ project culture: possibility of technology action and project technology. Humanization of education, no. 6, pp. 115–119, 2009. (In Rus.)
25. Surtaeva, N. N. Humanitarian technologies in the modern educational space. Omsk: IROOO, 2009. (In Rus.)
26. Chechel, G. D. Project Method: Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Resultatas. Director, School of Economics, no. 4, p. 5, 1998. (In Rus.)
27. Shevkun, A. A. Preparation of teachers of vocational training for educational design activities in the conditions of the university. Science and business: ways of development, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 99–101, 2013. (In Rus.)
28. Erdyneeva, K. G, Chernyavskaya, V. S. Predictors of student performance in the context of self-discovery of their abilities. Scientific Review. Series 2: Humanities, no. 6, pp. 78–90, 2017. (In Rus.)
29. Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Kogan Page, London. 2006: 141–142. (In Engl.)
30. Kolb, D. Experiential Learning, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 2004: 38. (In Engl.) |