References |
1. Basyuk, V. S., Kovaleva, G. S. Innovative project of the Ministry of Education «Monitoring the formation of functional literacy»: main directions and first results. Domestic and foreign pedagogy, no. 4, pp. 13–33, 2019. (In Rus.)
2. Antonenko, I. V. Formation of functional literacy of schoolchildren in the context of updating the content of education. Methodist, no. 8, pp. 21–23, 2019. (In Rus.)
3. Askhadullina, N. N., Vildanova, D. R. Formation of functional literacy of schoolchildren as an actual problem of Russian education.Problems of modern pedagogical education, no. 70–2, pp. 27–31, 2021. (In Rus.)
4. Lysova, O. V., Abdullina, A. Sh., Nurimkhametova, L. K. Features of the formation of reflection of Russian schoolchildren in the light of functional literacy and standards of the XXI century. International Journal of Medicine and Psychology, no. 2, pp. 22–27, 2020. (In Rus.)
5. Shevchenko, N. I., Makhotin, D. A. Formation of functional literacy of schoolchildren and students: a study of developmental conditions. Interactive Education, no. 6, pp. 43–49, 2018. (In Rus.)
6. Cocchiarella C. What is Functional Literacy, and Why Does Our High-Tech Society Need It? Web. 06.08.2021. https://mindfultechnics.com/what-is-functional-literacy. (In Engl.)
7. Irwin Kirsch, John T. Guthrie The Concept and Measurement of Functional Literacy? Web. 06.08.2021.https://www.jstor.org/stable/747509?origin=crossref. (In Engl.)
8. Sari Sulkunen, A. Malin Literacy, Age and Recentness of Education Among Nordic Adults. Scandinavian Journal of Educational, Research, vol. 62, pp. 929–948, 2018. Web. 06.08.2021. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00313831.2017.1324898/(In Engl.)
9. Rizki, L., Priatna, N. Mathematical literacy as the 21st century skill. Journal of Physics: Confere-
nce Series, vol. 1157, is. 4, 2019, 042088. Web. 06.08.2021.https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.
1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088. (In Engl.)
10. Lailiyah,S. Mathematical literacy skills of students’ in term of gender differences. Web. 06.08.2021.https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.4995146. (In Engl.)
11. Ten Questions for Mathematics Teachers… and How PISA Can Help Answer Them. Web. 06.08.2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265387-en. (In Engl.)
12. Pentin, A. Yu., Kovaleva, G. S., Davydova, E. I., Smirnov, E. S. The state of natural science education in the Russian school based on the results of international studies TIMSS and PISA. Education Issues, no. 1, pp. 79–10, 2018. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-1-79-109. (In Engl.)
13. Roslova, L. O., Krasnyanskaya, K. A., Kvitko, E. S. Conceptual foundations for the formation and assessment of mathematical literacy. Domestic and foreign pedagogy, vol. 1.4, pp. 58–79, 2019. (In Rus.)
14. Yusupova, N. D., Skudareva, G. N. Continuous education of a mathematics teacher and PISA quality: from professional competence to mathematical literacy of schoolchildren. Education and self-development, no. 3, pp. 203–214, 2020. (In Rus.)
15. PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework Draft. Web. 22.07.2021. https://pisa.e-wd.org/ files/PISA%202021%20Mathematics%20Framework%20Draft.pdf. (In Engl.)
16. PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework (First Draft). Stockholm: PISA, OECD Publishing, 2018. P. 46. Web. 22.07.2021https://www.google.com/search?q (In Engl.)
17. Kontseptsiyanapravleniya «matematicheskayagramotnost’» issledovaniya PISA-2021. Web: 22.07.2021. https://www.oecd.org/pisa. (In Engl.)
18. Model of mathematical literacy in the PISA-2021 study. Web. 22.07.2021: http://iro23.ru/sites/default/files/kovaleva_g.s._funk_gram_fgos_logvinova_i.m.pdf. (In Rus.)
19. The concept of the direction «mathematical literacy» of the research PISA-2021. Web: 22.07.2021. https://fioco.ru/Contents/Item/Display/2201978. (In Rus.)
20. Zvereva, E. Ya. The role of contextual problems in mathematics in the formation of the professional activity of the future teacher of mathematics. Pedagogy, psychology and education: from theory to practice. Rostov on/D. 2014: 28–30. (In Rus.)
21. Verbitsky, A. A. Contextual training in a competence-based approach. Higher education in Russia, no. 11, pp. 39–46, 2006. (In Rus.)
22. Alekseeva, E. E. Methodological features of the formation of mathematical literacy of students as a component of functional literacy. World of science, culture, education, no. 4, pp. 214–218, 2020. (In Rus.)
23. Sanina, E. I., Nasikan, I. V. Contextual problems in mathematics as a means of developing students’ functional literacy. Scientific notes of the Oryol State University, no. 1, pp. 308–310, 2019. (In Rus.)
24. Yanushchik, O. V., Dalinger, V. A. Contextual mathematical problems and the formation of key competencies. Higher education in Russia, no. 3, pp. 151–154, 2017. (In Rus.)
25. Dalinger, V. A. Contextual tasks as a means of diagnosing the formation of educational and cognitive competence in students. International journal of expertise, no. 7, pp. 108, 2012. (In Rus.)
26. Shalashova, M. M. New in the assessment of educational achievements of students on the basis of a competence-based approach. Web.10.07.2021. http://rud.exdat.com/docs/index-763262.html? Page=5
(In Rus.) |