Article
Article name Activation of Students’ Abilities for Self-Development by Means of the Multicultural Content of Continuous Pedagogical Education
Authors Tkach L.T. Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor, tkachlt@mail.ru
Gello T.А. Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor, tatgel@yandex.ru
Bibliographic description Tkach L. T., Gello T. А. Activation of Students’ Abilities for Self-Development by Means of the Multicultural Content of Continuous Pedagogical Education // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 5. РР. 105–114. DOI: 10.21209/ 2658-7114-2021-16-5-105-114.
Section Theory and Methods of Professional Pedagogical Education
UDK 378.14
DOI 10.21209/2658-7114-2021-16-5-105-114
Article type
Annotation The use of continuity as a principle of organizing the educational process at a university is aimed at creating conditions that regulate the processes of self-education and self-organization of students, ensuring the formation of their subject position and the possibility of full participation in a dialogue with the teacher on the problems of the studied content of the disciplines of the main professional educational program. Based on the analysis of the formation of the theory and practice of lifelong education, the authors came to the conclusion that it is possible to apply its main ideas and principles in the design of the multicultural content of pedagogical education and the development of technologies for its development, which allow to indirectly control the process of formation of students’ abilities for self-development, which we understand as continuous activity in self-improvement and the development of personal professionally significant qualities, based on the desire to acquire new knowledge and due to one’s own choice in the context of the goal and objectives of the discipline and the requirements of the main professional educational program for the profile of training. The authors believe that the multicultural content of pedagogical education includes information related to various cultural groups and ethnic groups living in the region and their development will allow interaction in the pedagogical process on the basis of cooperation, taking into account the individual characteristics and cultural differences of pupils and their parents (legal representatives).Continuity is ensured through the system of classroom and extracurricular work on the study of the discipline “Multicultural education” and independent work of students in the project “Ethnology of Pridnestrovie”, which is an integral part of the course. The inclusion of students in project activities is carried out on the basis of their independent choice (topic, types of activities, etc.) and is aimed at the development of a humanistic orientation, a positive attitude towards oneself and representatives of other cultural groups, responsibility, acceptance of universal human values and the formation of other qualities, which in general characterize the ability for self-development.
Key words self-development, ability, multicultural education, continuity, teacher education content, project
Article information
References 1. Ushinsky, K. D. Collected works: In 11 volumes. M: Publishing house of the APN of the RSFSR, 1950. (In Rus.) 2. Faure, E. Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris, 1972. (In Engl.) 3. Dave, R. Lifelong Education and School Curriculum. Hamburg, 1973. P. 14–25. (In Engl.) 4. Mitusova, O. A. Architectonics and the logical and semantic content of the linguistic educational space: formal, informal, informational education of students. Scientific notes of SKAGS, no. 3, pp. 171–176, 2011. (In Rus.) 5. Yakimanskaya, I. S. Personality-oriented education in a modern school. M: Publishing house of the firm “September”, 1996. (In Rus.) 6. Bondarevskaya, E. V. Theory and practice of personality-oriented education. Rostov-on-Don: Bulat, 2000. (In Rus.) 7. Borisenkov, V. P., Gukalenko, O. V. Multicultural education – a new pedagogical paradigm. Conceptual apparatus of pedagogy and education. Yekaterinburg, 2019: 59–74. (In Rus.) 8. Banks, J. A. A content analysis of the Black American in textbooks. Social Education, no. 33, pp. 954–957, 1969. (In Engl.) 9. Grant, C. A. Challenging the myths about multicultural education. History of multicultural education. V. 2 / ed. by C. A. Grant, T. K. Chapman. N. Y.: Routledge. 2008: 316–325. (In Engl.) 10. Zimnaya, I. A. Key competencies as the effective-target basis of the competence approach in education. M: Research. centre. probl. quality of training. specialists, 2004. (In Rus.) 11. Khutorskoy, A. V. Key competencies as a component of a personality-oriented paradigm of education. National education, no. 2, pp. 58–64, 2003. (In Rus.) 12. Verbitsky, A. A. Personal and competence approaches in education: problems of integration. M: Logos, 2009. (In Rus.) 13. Gukalenko, O. V. Multicultural education: theory and practice: Monograph. Rostov-on-Don: publishing house of the Russian State Pedagogical University, 2003. (In Rus.) 14. Gukalenko, O. V., Tkach, L. T., Panova, L. D. Preparation of future teachers for professional activity in a multicultural educational space. Domestic and foreign pedagogy, no. 3, pp. 153–163, 2018. (In Rus.) 15. Gukalenko, O. V., Tkach, L. T. Organizational forms of implementation of the multicultural content of pedagogical education. Domestic and foreign pedagogy, no. 4, pp. 99–106, 2021.DOI 10.24412/2224-0772-2021-77-99-106. (In Rus.) 16. Slastenin, V. A. Formation of teacher identity in the process of professional training. M: Publishing house MAGISTRIS, 2000. (In Rus.) 17. Weaver, L. T., Skete, L. V. implementation of the principle of continuity in the scientific and practical training of undergraduates // World of science, culture, education. Scientific journal, no. 5, pp. 78–8, 2016. (In Rus.) 18. Professional education in Russia: (Prospects for development) / A. M. Novikov; Research Center for Problems of Continuing Professional Education. M: ICPNPO, 1997. (In Rus.) 19. Tomlinson, C. A. Mapping a route toward a differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership. 1999, vol. 57, pp. 12–16, 1999. (In Engl.) 20. Tulbure, C. The effects of differentiated approach in higher education: an experimental investigation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, no. 76, pp. 832–836, 2013. (In Engl.) 21. Tkach, L. T. Immersion in professional and pedagogical activity through culture with the support of a teacher. Educational technologies, no. 1, pp. 117–121, 2011. (In Rus.) 22. Borisenkov, V. P., Gukalenko, O. V., Pustovoitov, V. N. Multicultural educational space of the univer sity as an environment for the formation of citizenship and patriotism. Pedagogy, no. 2, pp. 44–51, 2018. (In Rus.) 23. Bondarevskaya, E. V., Karpova, N. K. Formation and development of the national school in Russia. Innovative school, no. 1, pp. 78–89, 2000. (In Rus.) 24. Mitina, L. M. Psychology of personal and professional development of subjects of education. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2014. (In Rus.) 25. Borisenkov, V. P., Gukalenko, O. V. Tkach, L. T.Рedagogical culture dialogics as a factor in competent teacher training. EUROPEAN PROCEEDINGS OF SOCIAL AND BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES. Conference proceedings Dialogue of cultures – culture of dialogue: from conflicting to understanding Moscow, 23–25 April, 2020. London, 2020: 184–189. (In Engl.)
Full articleActivation of Students’ Abilities for Self-Development by Means of the Multicultural Content of Continuous Pedagogical Education