| Annotation |
The article analyzes the problems of selection, upbringing and education of the elite in a modern transitive society; it updates the issue of education of nationally oriented elites in the context of the national-historical pedagogical tradition; the article reveals the tendencies of modern education that negatively affect on the upbringing of the highest stratum, which are: strengthening of pragmatic and individualistic principles, replacement of higher values by market ones, whereas the meaning and the main mission (anthropological, axiological and cultural-creating) of education are lost, education is being transformed into services and goods. Consequently, reflexive-value, educational aspects of the educational process were underestimated, which made it possible to form a system of personal and professional values of the individual. It is shown that de-ideologization and de-idealization of the upbringing process led to a violation of the most important principles of the Russian national-historical pedagogical tradition – the ideological conformity of upbringing; the priority of moral education over intellectual (which, in turn, should be carried out at a high level of difficulty); developing a sense of mutual involvement with the surrounding majority, which goes back to the idea of conciliarity; fostering moral responsibility for the results of one’s own transforming activity. It is concluded that the cognition and analysis of the topic in the context of elitology and elite pedagogy, as well as reflection of the national-historical pedagogical tradition of educating the elite in line with the scope of problems, will make it possible to identify, describe, understand, interpret and systematically implement productive historical and pedagogical ideas in modern conditions, which allowed to ensure the progress of Russian society and national culture back at that time. |
| References |
1. Karabushenko, P. L., Podvoisky, L. Ya., Rezakov, R. G. Elitology education: elite and university: monograph. M: «Eco-Inform», 2019. (In Rus.)
2. Shkaratan, O. I., Karacharovsky, V. V. Different goals of the same society. Sociological Research, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 2019. (In Rus.)
3. Kornetov, G. B. Prospects of knowledge of the pedagogical past in the mirror of the method of rational reconstruction R. Rorty. The psychological and pedagogical search academic journal, no. 1, pp. 106–125, 2019. (In Rus.)
4. Romanov, A. A. Discussing the categories of history of pedagogy (reading the psychological and pedagogical search academic journal). The psychological and pedagogical search academic journal, no. 1, pp. 53– 68, 2019. (In Rus.)
5. Yudina, N. P. Pedagogical tradition: the experience of conceptualization. Khabarovsk: Khabar. gos. ped. un-t, 2001. (In Rus.)
6. Baeva, L. V. High-tech society value paradigm. Logos et Praxis, no. 7–13, pp. 51–58, 2011. (In Rus.)
7. Verbitsky, A. A. Context education in the context of the history of pedagogical thought. Materials of international scientific-practical conference «Anthropological knowledge as a system-forming factor of professional pedagogical education», 2019. Kursk: Kursk state University: 26–30. (In Rus.)
8. Levdanskaya, Yu. Yu. Retrospective values upbringing of the elite in modern historical and pedagogical research. Materials of international. scientific-practical conference «Sources of research on the pedagogical past: interpretation of problems and problems of interpretation». 2019: 86–94. (In Rus.)
9. Rogova, A. V. Conciliarity and collectivity as the sense forming ideas of a domestic philosophical and pedagogical thought. Materials of international. scientific-practical conference «Sources of research on the pedagogical past: interpretation of problems and problems of interpretation», 2019: 73–79. (In Rus.)
10. Klimenko, T. K., Levdanskaya, Yu. Yu. Upbringing of the Cultural Elite: Value Paradigm. Materials XI of international. scientific-practical conference «Man and his values in the modern world», 2019: 56–64. (In Rus.)
11. Erdineyeva, K. G., Klimenko, T. K., Bordonskaya, L. A., Igumnova, E. A., Levdanskaya, Yu. Yu. University as a subject of the developing region: methodological approaches, principles. Scientific notes of the Transbaikal State University, no. 1, pp. 6–16, 2019. (In Rus.)
12. Erdyneeva, K. G. The axiological orientation of the students’ political mentality. Materials XI of international. scientific-practical conference «Man and his values in the modern world», 2015: 198–213. (In Rus.)
13. Aisner, L. Yu., Naumov, O. D. Anthropological mission of the classical University: cultural and historical context and modernity. Materials of international scientific-practical conference «Anthropological knowledge as a system-forming factor of professional pedagogical education». Kursk: Kursk state University, 2019: 16–18. (In Rus.)
14. Belogurov, A. Yu., Yarovova, T. V. Interdisciplinary approach in the strategy of university education development. News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences, no. 5, pp. 21–26, 2017. (In Rus.)
15. Goliguzov, D. V., Fedorov, V. E., Nemykin, A. V. Competitiveness of Russian education: risks of achieving the goal of the National Education Project. Materials of the all-Russian scientific-practical conference «Education, innovation, research as a resource for community development». Cheboksary: publishing house «Environment», 2019: 40–51. (In Rus.)
16. Orekhovskaya, N. А. Egalitarianism or elitism of university education: what is the trend of globalization era? Kazan Pedagogical Journal, no. 1, pp. 200–204, 2019. (In Rus.)
17. Olkhovskaya, E. Yu. Development of Elite Education in Russia (the end of the XIX–XX-th cent.). Dr. sci. diss. М., 2007. (In Rus.)
18. Sysoeva, Yu. Yu. Peculiarities of image logical approach to upbringing of the cultural elite. Scientific Review. Series 2: Humanities, no. 3, pp. 65–70, 2014. (In Rus.) |
