Annotation |
The article is devoted to the study of the moral identity of a younger teenager. The author analyzes
the philosophical and pedagogical grounds for the problem of the moral identity of a person, accepted in
domestic and foreign pedagogy. The study is carried out in line with the axiological approach, during which
the term “morality” is considered as a set of value orientations of an individual and the concept of “identity”
as an awareness of one’s own uniqueness, on the one hand, and a sense of internal solidarity with social
ideals, on the other. The author specifies the concept of “moral identity of a younger teenager” as a set of
value characteristics of a person, which are formed through correlation of oneself with one’s age role, social
status, existential essence in accordance with the moral norms inherent in social communities to which one
feels one’s belonging and belonging, and on the basis of which relationships in the teenage community are
built and independent vital decisions are made.
The novelty of the study lies in the fact that a system of psychological and pedagogical diagnostics of
the moral identity of a younger teenager has been developed. The article presents the methods: “Definition
of moral concepts” according to L. S. Kolmogorova; Cattell test, 12PF/CPQ; scale of existence, ESK Frankl;
method of M. Rokeach “Value orientations” as the most popular in the study of the moral identity of a person.
The essential, substantive and diagnostic characteristics of the concept under study are scientifically substantiated.
The shortcomings in the level of the moral identity formation of younger adolescents are revealed. The necessity of purposeful work are focused on spiritual, moral and cultural values formation which form the
basis of self-organization of the activity and behavioral components of the identity of younger adolescents. |
References |
1. Klimenko, T. K. Modern state cultural policy as a basis for strengthening the family and its interaction
with the system of education in society. Humanitarian Vector, no. 1, pp. 15–17, 2015. (In Rus.)
2. Popova, N. N. Ethnopsychological features of value orientations and creativity of students towards
creativity. Scientific Review, no. 3–4, pp. 94–98, 2013. (In Rus.)
3. Rogova, A. V. The problem of education in the context of the state cultural policy of Russia. Bulletin
of the Vladimir State University named after Aleksandr Grigorievich and Nikolay Grigorievich Stoletov, no. 18,
pp. 33–39, 2014. (In Rus.)
4. Sysoeva, Yu. Yu. Innovative personality type: philosophical and pedagogical analysis of the concept.
Scientific Review, no. 3, pp. 5–11, 2015. (In Rus.)
5. Erdyneeva, K. G. The educational environment of the university as an object of humanitarian expertise.
Humanitarian Vector, no. 1, pp. 82–90, 2012. (In Rus.)
6. Soloviev, V. S. Justification for goodness. M: Institute of Russian Civilization, Algorithm, 2012. (In Rus.)
7. Berdyaev, N. A. Russian idea. St. Petersburg: ABC, 2015. (In Rus.)
8. Zinchenko, V. P. Developing Man: Essays on Russian Psychology. M: Trivola LLP, 1994. (In Rus.)
9. Marenko, I. S. Moral formation of the student’s personality. M: Pedagogy, 1985. (In Rus.)
10. Kant, I. Works. In 6 volumes / under total. ed. V. F. Asmusa [i dr.]. M: Thought. 1963. (In Engl.)
11. Hegel, G. W. F. Lectures on the history of philosophy: in 3 books. Book. 1. St. Petersburg: Science,
2001. (In Engl.)
12. Wentzel, K. N. Moral education and freedom. Free education, no. 2, pp. 45–52, 1907–1908. (In Rus.)
13. Dzhishkariani, T. D. Spiritual and moral education of schoolchildren: study guide for an elective course
for students of the direction Pedagogical education. Shuya: publishing house of FGBOU VPO «SHGPU».
2011. (In Rus.)
14. Schneider, L. B. Professional identity. M: Prometheus. 2004. (In Rus.)
15. Hesle, V. Trauma and tragedy.Questions of Philosophy, no. 10, pp. 1–17, 1994. (In Engl.)
16. Laing, R. I and others. Nodules. M: Institute for Humanitarian Studies. 2017. (In Engl.)
17. Bondarevskaya, E. V. Education and culture. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 1998. 365 p. (In Rus.) |