Article
Article name The Formation of the Theory and Methodology of Human Education in the Works of Ya. A. Komensky and in the Russian Philosophical and Pedagogical Ideas of the 19th ‒ first half of the 20th centuries
Authors Rogova A.V. Doctor of Pedagogy, Professor, av-rogova1950@mail.ru
Bibliographic description Rogova A. V. The Formation of the Theory and Methodology of Human Education in the Works of Ya. A. Komensky and in the Russian Philosophical and Pedagogical Ideas of the 19th ‒ first half of the 20th centuries // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. 2023. Vol. 18, no. 1. P. 124-136. DOI: 10.21209/2658-7114-2023-18-1-124-136.
Section PEDAGOGY OF SPIRITUAL AND MORAL EDUCATION
UDK 37.013.73
DOI 10.21209/2658-7114-2023-18-1-124-136
Article type Original article
Annotation During the periods of cultural and civilizational choice of the development of the world community, the problem of the importance of human education as a mechanism for preserving its highest humanistic purpose arises before it with all the evidence and urgency. In this connection, there is a need for a holistic retrospective study of the theory and methodology of education as a fundamental category of pedagogy – the science of the “spiritual guidance” of an individual from the sphere of natural childhood into the world of cultural adulthood. Philosophical and pedagogical heritage of Ya. A. Komensky, which analysis is presented in the article, has determined the content of the target and value attitudes of further research for the next centuries. The pansophical idea of the integrity and unity of the world and man, based on Christian methodology, became the basis, among other things, for the development of Russian philosophical and pedagogical thought, the intensive formation of which was carried out in the XIX century. In this regard, the article shows the significance of the views of Slavophiles on conciliarity, the theory of unity of V. S. Solovyov in the design on the canons of Orthodoxy of Russian pedagogy. The approaches to the realization of the pansophic idea in anthropologically oriented works of a number of Russian scientists are revealed. The leading directions of the search and interpretation of the ideas of Ya. A. Komensky are highlighted. In the context of the development of anthropological pedagogy, the growth of new knowledge based on the achievements of the humanities of that time, in particular, psychology, is shown. The article reveals the basic positions of scientists in understanding the spiritual essence of man on the basis of a comparative analysis of the philosophical and pedagogical ideas of Ya. A. Komensky and representatives of the Russian diaspora; the unity of the divine and the earthly; the role of natural, social and cultural factors and the importance of the category of integrity in the upbringing and education of the individual. The continuity of the legacy of Ya. A. Komensky and domestic scientists in the interpretation of the goals, objectives and means of the pedagogical process is established.
Key words Ya. A. Komensky, pansophy, Russian pedagogy of the XIX century, Russian abroad, culture, spirituality, category of integrity
Article information
References 1. Lotman, Yu. M. Semiosphere. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo, 2000. (In Rus.) 2. Bakhtin, M. M. To the methodology of literary criticism. Man: image and essence. Humanitarian aspects, no. 1, pp. 218–226, 2004. (In Rus.) 3. Bibler, V. S. Civilization and culture: philosophical reflections on the eve of the XXI century. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities, no. 2., pp. 9–49, 1998. (In Rus.) 4. Boguslavsky, M. V. Modern educational policy in the context of the actualization of historical and pedagogical knowledge. Science. Control. Education. RF, no. 2, pp. 8–12, 2022. (In Rus.) 5. Kagan, M. S. Problems of the methodology of humanitarian knowledge. Selected works. M: Yurait Publishing House, 2019. (In Rus.) 6. Kornetov, G. B. Human education in the space of society and culture: history, theory, practice. Moscow: Academy of Social Management, 2022. (In Rus.) 7. Arshinov, V. I., Budanov, V. G. Formation of the methodology of complexity-semiotic thinking in dialogue with quantum mechanics. Questions of Philosophy, no. 8, pp. 77–85, 2022. (In Rus.) 8. Knyazeva, E. N. Social and humanitarian knowledge and natural science: blurring boundaries. Philosophy of science and technology, no. 2, pp. 9–12, 2020. (In Rus.) 9. Kurdyumov, S. P. “Analogues of the second law of thermodynamics in open nonlinear media,” in Human World: Uncertainty as a Challenge. M: Lenand, 2019. (In Rus.) 10. Prigogine, I. R., I. Stengers Order out of chaos: A new dialogue between man and nature. Translation from English by Yu. A. Danilov; general edition and afterword by V. I. Arshinov, Yu. L. Klimontovich, Yu. V. Sachkov. 6th edition. M: URSS, 2008. (In Rus.) 11. Komensky, Ya. A. The labyrinth of light and the paradise of the heart. Moscow: MIC, 2000. (In Rus.) 12. Komensky, Ya. A. Great didactics: selected chapters. Web. 15.08.2022. http://makarenko-museum. narod.ru/Classics/Komensky/Komensky_Yan_Amos_Velikaya_didakt_izbr.htm. (In Rus.) 13. Naumov, N. D. P. P. Blonsky: philosopher and teacher. Bulletin of the Ural State University, no. 27, pp. 97–107, 2003. (In Rus.) 14. Marchukova, S. M. The idea of pansophy and hermeneutics in the methodological design of the philosophical and educational project of Ya. A. Komensky. Heuristic potential of the philosophical and educational project of Ya. A. Komensky. St. Petersburg: Russian State Pedagogical University named after A. I. Herzen, 2022. (In Rus.) 15. Marchukova, S. M., Melnikov G. P. The legacy of Yan Amos Komensky: a view from the XXI century. Psychological and pedagogical search, no. 4, pp. 53–65, 2017. (In Rus.) 16. Yurkevich, P. D. Philosophical works. M: Pravda, 1990. (In Rus.) 17. Modzalevsky, L. N. The historical significance of Christianity (Excerpt from the history of education and training). St. Petersburg: Publishing house of N. G. Martynov, 1892. (In Rus.) 18. Marchukova, S. M. The development of the idea of pansophy in the pedagogical works of Ya. A. Komensky. Dr. sci. diss. SPb., 2014. (In Rus.) 19. Trubetskoy, E. N. The meaning of life M: Ed. Republic, 1994. (In Rus.) 20. Zorina, L. N. The idea of unity in the philosophical aesthetics of Vl. Solovyov. Solovyov Research, no. 1, 2006. Web. 15.08.2022. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ideya-vseedinstva-v-filosofskoy-estetike-vlsolovieva. (In Rus.) 21. Redkin, P. G. About education. St. Petersburg: Type. l/t V. V. Komarova, 1914. (In Rus.) 22. Dneprov, E. D. Ushinsky and the present / State Un-ty – Higher School of Economics. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2007. (In Rus.) 23. Perminova, L. M. The modern nature of P. F. Kapterev’s didactic views. Domestic and foreign pedagogy, no. 6, 2014. Web.15.08.2022. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennyy-harakter-didakticheskih- vzglyadov-p-f-kaptereva. (In Rus.) 24. Sikorsky, I. A. Psychological foundations of education. Kiev: I. N. Kushnareva and Co., 1905. (In Rus.) 25. Ostrogorsky, V. P. Letters on aesthetic education. M: Sytin, 1908. (In Rus.) 26. Kapterev, P. F. Didactic essays: Theory of education. Ed. 2nd, revised and ext. Pg.: Zemlya, 1915. VI, 434 p. Web. 15.08.2022. http://elib.gnpbu.ru/text/kapterev_didakticheskie-ocherki_1915/(In Rus.) 27. Rubinstein, M. M. Aesthetic education of children. M: Sivtsev Vrazhek, 1917. (In Rus.) 28. Gasparyan, A. G. P. F. Lesgaft on the physical education of children and adolescents. Education and upbringing: methods and practice, no. 30-1, 2016. Web. 15.08.2022. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/p-flesgaft- o-fizicheskom-vospitanii-detey-i-podrostkov. (In Rus.) 29. Kareev, N. I. Thoughts on the foundations of morality. St. Petersburg: Type. M. M. Stasyulevich, 1896. (In Rus.) 30. Rozanov, V. V. Twilight of Enlightenment. Collection of articles on education. St. Petersburg: P.Pertsov’s publishing house, M.Merkushev’s Type, 1899. (In Rus.) 31. Pobedonostsev, K. P. Character education at school. St. Petersburg: Synodal type., 1900. (In Rus.) 32. Vakhterov, V. P. Subject method of teaching. M: Type. t-va I. D. Sytin, 1907. (In Rus.) 33. Komensky, Ya. A. Pampedia / Komensky Ya. A., Locke D., Rousseau Zh.-Zh., Pestalozzi I. G. Pedagogical heritage / comp. V. M. Klarin, A. N. Dzhurinsky. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989. (In Rus.) 34. Rogova, A. V. Conciliarity and collectivity as meaning-forming ideas of the Russian philosophical and pedagogical thought. Scientific notes of the Transbaikal State University, no. 4, pp. 85–92, 2019. (In Rus.) 35. Zenkovsky, V. V. Problems of education in the light of Christian anthropology. M: School-Press, 1996. (In Rus.) 36. Ilyin, I. A. Axioms of religious experience. Research: in 2 volumes, vol. 1. Moscow: Russian Book, 2002. (In Rus.) 37. Rogova, A. V. Interpretation of Ya. A. Komensky ideas in theory and practice of the Russian abroad. Interpretation of the ideas of Ya. A. Komensky in historical and pedagogical research: methodology, methodology, basic principles of implementation: monograph / ed. S. M. Marchukova. St. Petersburg: Petershule, 2021: 144–154. (In Rus.)
Full articleThe Formation of the Theory and Methodology of Human Education in the Works of Ya. A. Komensky and in the Russian Philosophical and Pedagogical Ideas of the 19th ‒ first half of the 20th centuries