| Annotation |
One of the urgent problems in primary general education is the problem of achieving meta-subject results
by younger students, one of which is the formation of meta-subject concepts. The latter contributes
to improving the quality of educational results, forming a picture of the world. In this regard, primary school
teachers need to know what meta-concepts are, their types, what meta-concepts are studied by younger
students. Teachers should be able to choose and apply appropriate learning strategies, methods, techniques,
technologies for the formation of meta-concepts among younger students. The article offers examples of meta-
concepts used in elementary school in the study of literary reading, fine art, music. The purpose of the study
is to identify the state of formation of methodological competence of primary school teachers in the formation
of meta-concepts among younger schoolchildren. The author uses a method of analyzing scientific theories, which made it possible to reveal various aspects, separate views of scientists on the concept of “meta-understanding”
in younger schoolchildren. The generalization method has made it possible to determine the need
and directions for the formation of the appropriate methodological competence among primary school teachers.
The questionnaire method has been used to study the level of formation of methodological competence
among primary school teachers in Chita on the formation of meta-concepts of younger schoolchildren. The
author analyzes the results of the study conducted in order to identify the formation of methodological competence
of primary school teachers in Chita on the younger schoolchildren’s meta-concepts formation. The
survey showed that teachers understand the importance of forming meta-concepts of younger schoolchildren;
have an idea of some meta-concepts; but do not clearly understand what methods, techniques; technologies
can be used to form them. The analysis of teacher questionnaires indicates the need for systematic work to
increase the methodological competence of primary school teachers in the field of younger schoolchildren’s
meta-concepts formation. In the article, the author indicates the prospects for research: conducting methodological
associations, seminars, master classes for primary school teachers. |
| References |
1. Zhivokorentseva, T. V. Integration of the education content in a pedagogical college as a problem of
collective practical-oriented research. Cand. sci. diss. St. Petersburg, 2005. (In Rus.)
2. Asmolov, A. G. Strategy and methodology of socio-cultural modernization of education. M: FSAGU
FIRO, 2011. (In Rus.)
3. Gromyko, N. V. The renewal of knowledge in education is one of the main directions for the search for
investigative pedagogy. Collection of materials of the III Interregional Conference «The investigative practice
of education ‒ the creation of a new Russian pedagogy». Yaroslavl: Nice LLC, 2011: 95–101. (In Rus.)
4. Koval, T. V., Kryuchkova E. A. Metapremetal approach to the study of concepts: requirements of
Federal State Standards and problems of their implementation in a comprehensive school. Domestic and
foreign pedagogy, no. 3, p. 75–84, 2017. (In Rus.)
5. Kolesina, K. Yu. Meta-project training: theory and technology of implementation in the educational
process. Dr. sci. diss. abstr. Rostov-on-Don: SFU, 2009. (In Rus.)
6. Lobok, A. M. Anthropology of myth. Yekaterinburg: Cultural Information Bank, 1997. (In Rus.)
7. Khutorskoy, A. V. Work with the meta-subject component of the new educational standard. Public
education, no. 4, p. 157‒163, 2013. (In Rus.)
8. Khutorskoy, A. V. Heuristic type of education: results of scientific and practical research. Pedagogy,
no. 7, pp. 15–22, 1999. (In Rus.)
9. Chomsky, N. Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. (In Engl.)
10. Shapoval, Yu. R. Meta-subjectivity in education. Relevance and perspectives. Bulletin of Science
and Education, no. 10, pp. 84–87, 2019. (In Rus.)
11. Mezirow, J. A Critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education, no. 1, pр. 3–24, 1981.
DOI: 10.1177/074171368103200101. (In Engl.)
12. Sleeter, C. E. Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools: research and the overwhelming presence
of whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, no. 2, pр. 94–106, 2001. DOI: 10.1177/0022487101052002002.
(In Eng.)
13. Delamare, Le Deist F., Winterton J. Que’s que c’e competence. Human Resource Development
International, no. 1, pр. 27–46, 2005. (In Engl.)
14. Voyushina, M. P., Suvorova, E. P. Connection of practical and extracurricular educational activities
in the UMK «Dialogue» Problems of philological education. Saratov: Publishing house Sarat. un-ta, no. 6, pp.
7–14, 2014. (In Rus.)
15. Voyushina, M. P., Suvorova, E. P. The relationship between time and extracurricular activities is a
condition for improving the quality of educational results. Elementary school, no. 8, p. 37–40, 2015. (In Rus.)
16. Ogbu, J. U. Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Educational Researcher, no. 8, pр. 5–14,
1992. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X021008005. (In Engl.)
17. Khuziakhmetova, A., Naumova, M. Diagnostics of Pupils’ Meta-Subject Competence During Lessons
on Mathematics in Secondary Schools. International Journal of environmental & science education, no. 9,
pp. 2333–2342, 2016. (In Engl.)
18. Petrova, Hr. Formation of meta-subject knowledge and skills in the process of training in Рhysics in
the secondary school. Bulgarian Chemical Communications, vol. 47, special issue, pp. 514–518, 2015. (In
Engl.)
19. Danyluk, A. Ya. Theory of education integration. Rostov n/D.: Publishing House Rost. ped. un-ta,
2000. (In Rus.)
20. Zhurin, A. A., Dedkov, Yu. M. Metapremetal training results: terminology and structure. Pedagogical
education and science, no. 6, pp. 84–89, 2019. (In Rus.)
21. Poprygina, A. A., Voronina, L. V. Integration of subject areas as a means of mastering meta-subject
concepts by younger schoolchildren. Pedagogical education in Russia, no. 3, pp. 140–147, 2020. (In Rus.)
22. Demidova, A. V., Bermus, A. G. Didactic technologies for the formation of inter-subject concepts in
students of the main school. Modern problems of science and education, no. 2, pp. 27–35, 2021. (In Rus). |
