| Annotation |
The article substantiates the author’s position that studying of childhood as a strategic resource of Russia’s
cultural sovereignty is a new scientific problem that reflects undeveloped issues in the field of psychological
and pedagogical research, as well as the methodology and methods of raising children. The aim of
the study is to research the essential characteristics of the concepts of “cultural sovereignty”, “childhood”,
“strategic resource”, “value potential of childhood” in the context of interdisciplinary research and the formation
of their working definitions. The research work is based on the assumption that threats to the cultural
sovereignty of Russia are in the sphere of influence on children, imposing values and worldview positions to
children’s community, that contradict traditional national spiritual and moral values. The methodological basis
of the research work has become the axiological, culturological, socio-cultural approaches. General logical
research methods are used for the purposes of the research work (analysis, synthesis, generalization, analogy,
modeling, etc.), which ensured the complexity, consistency, integrity of representation of the research subject and the possibility of forming the author’s view and scientific substantiation of the main aspects of the
research. As a result of the research work, the author substantiates the specifics and crisis development risks
of the current situation of preserving Russia’s cultural sovereignty in the context of the country’s security general
problem. The research presents normative, conceptual and scientific views to the concepts of “cultural
sovereignty”, “strategic resource”, “childhood”. The author substantiates the necessity of procuring a set of
systemic measures to form the value potential of childhood in Russia as a strategic resource for Russia’s cultural
sovereignty. The author refers modern trends and practices of education to systemic measures based on
improving the forms and methods of countering the risks of the spread of destructive ideology in the children’s
environment; improving the forms and methods of raising children in accordance with the goals of state policy
for the preservation and strengthening of traditional values. The results obtained to the importance of studying
the phenomenon of childhood as a source of Russia’s cultural sovereignty and as a new scientific problem.
The research work materials and results can be used to develop new scientific problems in childhood sphere
studying and in a new upbringing methodology, as well as in the production and retraining of teaching staff. |
| References |
1. Grachev, N. State structure and sovereignty in the modern world: issues of theory and practice. Dr. sci.
diss. abstr. M, 2009. (In Rus.)
2. Didenko, N. Transformation of the political and legal content of state sovereignty at the turn of the
XX–XXI centuries. Cand. sci. diss. Rostov-on-Don, 2006. (In Rus.)
3. Levin, I. D. Sovereignty. St. Petersburg: Legal Center Press, 2003. (In Rus.)
4. Voronova, O. Military special operation and the concept of «integrated deterrence» of Russia in the
latest US National Security and National Defense Strategies. Ideology of the future: socio-political, scientifictheoretical,
expert-analytical journal, no. 7, 2022. Web. 07.02.2023. https://histrf.ru/images/RVIO_7_2022 (In
Rus.)
5. Klebanov, L. Criminal-legal protection of cultural sovereignty of Russia. Criminal law, no. 5, pp. 28–35,
2008. (In Rus.)
6. Shabrov, O. Cultural policy and national-state sovereignty. Power, no. 6, 2020. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.
v28i6.7800 (In Rus.)
7. Vygotsky, L. Psychology of human development. M: Publishing house Sense; Publishing house
Eksmo, 2005. (In Rus.)
8. DeMause Lloyd. Psychohistory; [transl. from English. A. Shkuratova]. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix, 2000.
(In Rus.)
9. Mid, M. Culture and the world of childhood: Selected works; [Trans. from English. and comment.
Yu. A. Aseeva]. M: Nauka, 1988. (In Rus.)
10. Feldstein, D. Modern Childhood: problems and ways to solve them. Bulletin of practical psychology
of education, no. 2, 2009. (In Rus.)
11. Elkonin, D. Mental development in childhood. M.: Ed. In-t prakt. psychology. Voronezh: MODEK,
1997. (In Rus.)
12. Dialogue of cultures in a globalizing world: worldview aspects. Russian Academy of Sciences,
Institute of Philosophy. M: Nauka, 2005. (In Rus.)
13. Kagan, M. S. Philosophy of culture; Akad. Humanities, etc. St. Petersburg: Petropolis, 1996. (In Rus.)
14. Tugarinov, V. P. Selected philosophical works. Leningrad: Publishing House of the Leningrad
University, 1988. (In Rus.)
15. Rubinstein, S. L. Fundamentals of general psychology. M: Peter, 2012. (In Rus.)
16. Parsons, T. On social systems. M: Akad. Project, 2002. (In Rus.)
17. Rokeach, M. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press. 1973. (In Engl.)
18. Bakhtin, M. M. To the philosophy of action. Collected works: in 7 vols. Vol. 1. M: Russian Dictionaries,
2003. (In Rus.)
19. Krylova, N. B. Culturology of education. M: Public Education, 2000. (In Rus.)
20. Lapin, N. I. The complexity of a new Russia formation. Anthroposociocultural approach. M: The
Whole World, 2021. (In Rus.)
21. Sorokin, P. Man. Civilization. Society. M: Politizdat, 1992. (In Rus.)
22. Wang Huning Cultural Expansion and Cultural Sovereignty: A Challenge to the Concept of Sovereignty.
Web. 07.02.2023. https://neodemocracy.blogspot.com/2022/10/wang-huning-cultural-expansion-and.html (In
Engl.)
23. Nosko, I. Childhood as a complex problem. Collection of scientific papers «Social work in Siberia».
Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2004. (In Rus.)
24. Kamaldinova, E. On the actual problems of modern childhood. State and civil society. M: Humanitarian
University. no.2, 2012. Web. 07.02.2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ob-aktualnyh-problemahsovremennogo-
detstva (In Rus.)
25. Nefedova, L. The phenomenon of childhood in the main forms of its representation (philosophy,
myth, folklore, literature). Dr. sci. diss. abstr. Omsk, 2005. (In Rus.)
26. Feldstein, D. Social development in the space-time of childhood. M: Mosk. psycho-social in-t: Flinta,
1997. (In Rus.)
27. Fusu, L. Deed as the main criterion of morality. Socio-political sciences: a scientific journal. no. 5,
2018. Web. 07.02.2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/postupok-kak-glavnyy-kriteriy-nravstvennosti (In
Rus.)
28. Tikhonova, N. E. Social stratification in modern Russia: the experience of empirical analysis. M:
Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2007. Web. 07.02.2023. https://www.civisbook.ru/
files/File/socialnaya stratifikacia.pdf (In Rus.) |
