| Annotation |
The relevance is related to the need to develop engineering innovative thinking of schoolchildren based on inventive, technical activities. The hypothesis of the study is as follows: the organization of inventive activity of schoolchildren is advisable, taking into account the principles of thinking development and on the basis of a network association of schoolchildren for an event related to invention. The novelty lies in the justification of the need for network interaction in the organization of schoolchildren’s inventive activities; in highlighting the possibilities of network interaction to take into account the principles of thinking development. The principle of subjectivity is associated with the need to develop conscious human self-regulation; the principle of clarity is to highlight the essential aspects of the subject of study for the correct and rapid formation of the required concept; the principle of normality determines the need for the formation of norms, patterns, algorithms of mental activity; the principle of consistency is aimed at forming connections between concepts, eventually forming cognitive-representative structures of thinking; the principle of creativity is aimed at developing imagination, the main condition for its implementation is the creation of a creative environment; the principle of complementarity is associated with the use of dichotomous models in the educational process, dialectically mutually exclusive and complementary to each other for a holistic understanding of the studied object. Research methods are analysis of scientific and methodological literature, organization of networking in education and the experience of organizing schoolchildren’s inventive activities, observation, interview with participants of various events related to children’s invention, analysis of the practice of such events. The practical results of the work are determined by the organization of mass events for schoolchildren, which require their active communication within the framework of the interaction of various subjects of the educational process, possible in a network format: Engineering Olympiad, Tournament of Young Inventors, Ural-Innova Young Inventors competition. As a result, the following research results have been obtained: it is most advisable to create the organization of schoolchildren’s inventive activities in the network interaction with centers at universities. The development of thinking should be considered as the goal of this activity; the methodological basis of this activity are the principles of thinking development.
|
| References |
1. Usoltsev, A. P. Principles of thinking development. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University, 2023. (In Rus.)
2. Slinkina, I. N. Definition of network interaction in the field of education. Problems of modern pedagogical education, no. 2, pp. 333–335, 2016. (In Rus.)
3. Agramakova, O. V. Network forms of implementation of training programs for engineering personnel ready for innovation. Scientific notes of the International Banking Institute, no. 20, pp. 124–143. 2017. (In Rus.)
4. Zapalatskaya, V. S. Organization of research activities of gifted children based on network interaction. Bulletin of the Maikop State Technological University, no. 2, pp. 55–62, 2023. (In Rus.)
5. Fan, J., Su J. Influence of social network strength on entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: A chain mediation model of need knowledge and technological knowledge. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 6, 2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/3817644. (In Eng.)
6. Castonguay, Y., Cayrol, A., Hamouti, R. Success factors of a technological entrepreneurship project: a systematic review. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, no. 20, pp. 141–154, 2020. (In Eng.)
7. Thomas, E., Asheim B. Entrepreneurial ecosystems, learning regions, and the role of universities. Fernandes S. et al. (eds.), Universities, Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, and Sustainability. Berlin/Boston: DeGruyter, pp. 11–24, 2022. DOI: 10.1515/9783110670219-002. (In Eng.)
8. Fomenko, S. L. Educational ecosystem of professional and pedagogical education. Pedagogical education in Russia, no. 2, pp. 70–81, 2024. (In Rus.)
9. Helmholtz. Web. 04.05.2024. https://www.helmholtz.de/en/about-us/who-we-are. (In Eng.)
10. Rimm, S. B., Siegle, D. B., Davis, G. A. Education of the Gifted and Talented. Boston: Pearson, 2018. (In Eng.)
11. Chistov, A. A personality-oriented model of professional training in the process of networking. CITISE, 2022. (In Rus.)
12. Pankratova, L. P. Networking as a new format for organizing children’s technical creativity. Academic Bulletin. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg Academy of Postgraduate Pedagogical Education, no. 3, pp. 18–23, 2020. (In Rus.)
13. Bykova, S. S. Development of divergent thinking of younger adolescents on the basis of pedagogical technology for solving inventive tasks. Prospects of science and education, no. 3, pp. 323–335, 2020. (In Rus.)
14. Terekhova, G. V. The development of inventive abilities of younger schoolchildren in the system of additional education. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, no. 7, pp. 87–91, 2017. (In Rus.)
15. Novoselov, S. A. Tournament and festival of young inventors and innovators – a new form of students’ technical creativity development. Pedagogical education in Russia, no. 6, pp. 30–34, 2012. (In Rus.)
16. Novoselov, S. A. Festival of young inventors and innovators: structure, content, effectiveness. Pedagogical education and science, no. 4, pp. 82–88, 2013. (In Rus.)
17. Usoltsev, A. P. About the concept of “Engineering thinking”. Materials of the international scientific and practical conference, Yekaterinburg: 07–08 April 2015: 3–9. (In Rus.)
18. Usoltsev, A. P. The concept of innovative thinking. Pedagogical education in Russia, no. 1, pp. 94–98, 2014. (In Rus.)
19. Konopkin, O. A. Mental self-regulation of voluntary human activity (structural and functional aspect). Questions of psychology, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 1995. (In Rus.)
20. Novoselov, S. A. Technology for the integrated development of creative abilities of children and adults – AS-technology. Social pedagogy, no. 1, pp. 66–78, 2019. (In Rus.)
|
