Article |
---|
Article name |
Original Premise of Designing a Logical Sign Model as a System of Technological Map Rules, the Frame Problem |
Authors |
Maksyutova G.Y.postgraduate lingvamax@rambler.ru |
Bibliographic description |
|
Section |
|
DOI |
|
UDK |
373.2 |
Article type |
|
Annotation |
The article focuses upon the ways to project a logical or a sign model and its systemic
representation by means of the detailed process chart or its elements. The subject of the given
investigation is the logical/ sign model of the pre-schooler’s achievement development. In our
opinion, the initial steps to project a logical/ sign model can be defined in a certain way. Our
experience supports the idea of describing the meta-subject approach to pre-schoolers’ comprehension
of the meta-poetic texts as a productive technology, which may be used to develop
students’ speech skills (including speech in a foreign language). Metaphorically speaking, the
pre-schooler’s achievement is the identity of the self and “the others”. So, the subject result
is achieved in the course of the children’s development during their active communication at
different classes, including those of the English language, by means of the game techniques.
The meta-subject result can be achieved by using real and fiction images, schematic images,
drawings, sign representations of different elements present in the children’s environment in
class. The initial steps of making up a logical model were defined in the course of the investigation
and practical work.
|
Key words |
multidimension of the logical model, the idea of advanced education, “the law
of the emotional reality of fantasy”, metaphoric character of the meta-poetic text, a new formula
of the relationship. |
Article information |
|
References |
1. Ahmetova M. N., Maksjutova G.Ju. Modelirovanie pojetapnoj sistemy tehnologicheskih
processov stanovlenija uspeshnosti starshih doshkol\'nikov // Sib. ped. zhurnal. 2011. № 7.
S. 161–171.
2. Ahmetova M. N. Pedagogicheskoe proektirovanie v professional\'noj podgotovke. Novosibirsk:
Nauka, 2005. 309 s.
3. Budaev Je. V., Chudinov A. P. Metafora v politicheskoj kommunikacii: monografija.
M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2008. 248 s.
4. Vygotskij L. S. Pedagogicheskaja psihologija. M., 1991. 449 s.
5. Il\'in E. N. Rozhdenie uroka. M., 1996. 125 s.
6. Klochkov V. P., Krotova I. V. Shkol\'nyj uchebnik i ego nagljadnost\': ucheb. posobie
dlja stud. ped. vuzov. Kurgan: Kurganskij gos. un-t, 2009. 98 s.
7. Krylova N. B. Kul\'turnye modeli obrazovanija s pozicii postmoderni-stskoj pedagogiki
// Novye cennosti obrazovanija. M., 1997. Vyp. 7. S. 185–205.
8. Leont\'ev A. A. Dejatel\'nostnyj um: dejatel\'nost\'. Znak. Lichnost\'. M., 2001. 392 s.
9. Nemenskij B. M. Pedagogika iskusstva. M.: Prosvewenie. 2007. 255 s.
10. Sen\'ko Ju. V. Gumanitarnye osnovy pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija: kurs lekcij:
ucheb. posobie dlja stud. vuzov. M.: Akademija, 2000. 240 s.
11. Ursul A. D. Ustojchivoe razvitie civilizacii i obrazovanija v XXI veke. M.: Zeljonyj krest,
1995. 205 s.
12. Hejzinga Johan. Homo ludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnja / per. s nider-land. V. Oshisa.
M.: AST. 2004. 539 s.
13. Shevchenko S. D. Shkol’nyj urok: Kak nauchit’ kazhdogo. M., 1992. 175 s. |
Full article | Original Premise of Designing a Logical Sign Model as a System of Technological Map Rules, the Frame Problem |