Article
Article name Co-Evolutionary Paradigm of Ecological Education for Sustainable Development: Methodological Basis
Authors Vinokurova N.F.Doctor of Pedagogy, Professor eco@bk.ru
Bibliographic description Vinokurova N. F. Co-Evolutionary Paradigm of Ecological Education for Sustainable Development: Methodological Basis // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 4. РР. 65–74. DOI: 10.21209/2658-7114-2021-16-4-65-74.
Section
DOI 10.21209/2658-7114-2021-16-4-65-74
UDK 37.013.46
Article type
Annotation Throughout the history of its development, environmental education has been viewed as a priority area in the modernization of all educational systems in the face of aggravated environmental problems. A comparative analysis of the change in environmental education paradigms made it possible to conclude that they evolved in accordance with the change in cognitive models and value-target guidelines: environmental education, environmental education and environmental education for sustainable development. On the basis of a generalization of philosophical, scientific, psychological and pedagogical research, the statement is substantiated that in the modern conditions of the global environmental crisis, the relevance and importance of developing the methodological foundations of environmental education based on a co-evolutionary strategy, which ensures the transition of mankind to the path of sustainable development, is obvious. The article reveals the methodological foundations of the co-evolutionary strategy of environmental education for sustainable development, which reflects the cognitive model, value co-evolutionary relations and the constructive coherent-creative orientation of nature-friendly activity. The co-evolutionary paradigm of environmental education for sustainable development, based on the ideas of synergy, reflects the picture of the world of a post-industrial society. The essence of co-evolutionary subject-activity, transdisciplinary, integrative and integrative-situational, cultural-ecological coherent-creative approaches is revealed. The conclusion is made about the semantic and value-worldview conjugation of these approaches, which ensures the integrity of the methodological foundations of the co-evolutionary paradigm of environmental education for sustainable development. The experience of the Nizhny Novgorod scientific school of environmental education in the implementation of the considered methodological approaches in environmental education for sustainable development is presented. The promising directions of research on this problem are formulated, related to the determination of the functional completeness of the methodological foundations and the development of methods for their implementation in educational practice.
Key words evolutionary paradigm, environmental education for sustainable development, methodology
Article information
References 1. Argunova, M. V. Morgun, D. V. Axiological and methodological foundations of environmental education for sustainable development as a meta-subject area of education. Science and School, no. 6, pp. 9–18, 2017. (In Rus.) 2. Dzyatkovskaya, E. N., Zakhlebny, A. N. Humanization of environmental education as a vector of its development until 2030. Continuing education: XXI century, Issue. 1, pp. 116–129, 2021. (In Rus.) 3. Ermakov, D. S. The content of education for sustainable development. Bulletin of RUDN University, series of Psychology and Pedagogy, no. 3, pp. 91–96, 2013. (In Rus.) 4. Davis, J. Educating for sustainability in the early years: creating cultural change in a child care setting. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 21, pp. 47–55, 2005. DOI: 10.1017/ S081406260000094X. (In Engl.) 5. Jones, P., Trier, C., Richards, J. Embedding Education for Sustainable Development in higher education: a case study examining common challenges and opportunities for undergraduate programs.International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 47, pp. 341–350, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2008.11.001. (In Engl.) 6. Karpinskaya, R. S, Liseev, I. K, Ogurtsov, A. P. Philosophy of nature: co-evolutionary strategy. M: Interpraks, 1995. (In Rus.) 7. Knyazeva, E. N. The concept of inactivated cognition: historical preconditions and development prospects. Evolution. Thinking. Consciousness. (Cognitive approach and epistemology). M: Kanon +, 2004: 308–309. (In Rus.) 8. Moiseev, N. N. Historical development and environmental education. M: MNEPU, 1995. (In Rus.) 9. Stepin, V. S. The problem of the axiological basis of modern education. Materials of the «round table» «Philosophy, culture and education». Problems of philosophy, no. 3, pp. 5–15,2009. (In Rus.) 10. Kuhn, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. M: Progress, 2008. (In Rus.) 11. Bondarevskaya, E. V. Paradigm approach to the development of the content of key pedagogical competencies. Pedagogy, no. 10, pp. 15–20,2004. (In Rus.) 12. Buyeva, L. P. Crisis of education and problems of philosophy of education. Materials of the «round table» «Philosophy, culture and education». Problems of Philosophy, no. 3, pp. 12–19, 1999. (In Rus.) 13. Valitskaya, A. P. Philosophical substantiation of the modern paradigms of education. Pedagogy, no. 3, pp. 15–19, 1997. (In Rus.) 14. Slepenkova, E. A., Aksenov, S. I. Formation and development of teacher education in Russia: XVIII–XX centuries. Bulletin of the Minin University, no. 1, p. 7, 2021. (In Rus.) 15. Shubinsky, V. S. Problems of interdisciplinary synthesis of knowledge about a person as a pedagogical goal. New research in pedagogical sciences, M, 2010: 7–14. (In Rus.) 16. Panov, V. I. Ecopsychological interactions: types and typology. Social psychology and society, no. 3, pp. 13–27, 2013. (In Rus.) 17. Vorokhobov, A. V. The personalistic concept of subjectivity in the philosophical heritage of I. A. Ilyina. Bulletin of the Minin University, no. 3, pр. 9, 2020. (In Rus.) 18. Transdisciplinarity in philosophy and science: approaches, problems, prospects / Edited by V. Bazhanov, R. V. Scholtsa M: Navigator Publishing House, 2015. (In Rus.) 19. Wilber, K. Integral psychology: Consciousness, Spirit, Psychology, Therapy / K. Wilber; Per. from English ed. A. Kiseleva. M: LLC «ACT Publishing House» et al., 2004. (In Rus.) 20. Designing the eco-oriented life activity of the personality of students in the cultural landscape: theoretical and methodological discourse / ed. N. N. Demidova, N. F. Vinokurova. N. Novgorod, Blagovest, 2019. (In Rus.) 21. Kasimov, N. S., Glazovsky, N. F., Mazurov, Yu. L., Tikunov, V. S. Geography and Education for Sustainable Development. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Ser. Geography, no. 1, pp. 38–49, 2005. (In Rus.) 22. Kochurov, B. I., Vinokurova, N. F, Smirnova, V. M, Glebova, O. V, Lobkovsky, V. A. The culture of nature management: scientific and educational aspects. Problems of regional ecology, no. 4, pp. 159–168, 2014. (In Rus.) 23. Mamedov, N. M. The concept of sustainable development and environmental education. Ecology and Geography, no. 3, pp. 24–28, 1995. (In Rus.) 24. Ursul, A. D., Ursul, T. A. Evolutionary paradigms and models of education in the XXI century. Modern education, no. 1, pp. 1–67, 2012. (In Rus.)
Full articleCo-Evolutionary Paradigm of Ecological Education for Sustainable Development: Methodological Basis