References |
1. Gal\'skova, N. D. On the interaction of innovations and traditions in the theory of teaching foreign languages. Foreign languages at school, no. 11, pp. 2–10, 2018. (In Rus.)
2. Tarasov, E. F. Intercultural communication – a new ontology of the analysis of language consciousness. Ethnocultural specificity of language consciousness / ed. by N. V. Ufimtsev. M.: Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1996: 7–22. (In Rus.)
3. Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment companion volume with new descriptors, council of Europe. 2018. Web. 05.09.2021. https://rm.coe.int/cefrcompanion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787. (In Engl.)
4. Vasil\'eva, G. M., Yan, Kh. Vasilyeva, G. M., Yan H. Lexeme intellectual in explanatory dictionaries of Russian and Chinese languages: comparative description.Proceedings of the A. I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, no. 184, pp. 44–50 ,2017. (In Rus.)
5. Dmitrieva, N. M. Moral concepts (virtues) in the ethical conceptual sphere of the Russian language picture of the world. Orenburg: OSU, 2017. (In Rus.)
6. Avdeeva, A. E., Dmitrieva, N. M. Features of teaching ethical concepts of Russian fairy tales to foreigners. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, no. 2, pp. 53–60, 2020. (In Rus.)
7. Makshantseva, N. V., Koroleva, S. B. Teaching RCT through the prism of concept theory: culture, mentality, aspects of language. Language and culture, no. 47, pp. 231–244, 2019. (In Rus.)
8. Mishatina, N. L. Methodological linguoconceptology: the current state and vector of development. Actual problems of philology and pedagogical linguistics, no. 3, pp. 16–25, 2018. (In Rus.)
9. Shtyrlina, E. G. Concept as a linguodidactic unit in teaching Russian as a foreign language. Philology and Culture. Philology and Culture, no. 4, pp. 147–150, 2019. (In Rus.)
10. Litovkina, A. M. Ethnolinguistic foundations of the world perception of native speakers of Russian and Chinese languages. Global & Regional Research, no. 1, pp. 157–160, 2019. (In Rus.)
11. Prutskikh, T. A., Skobelkina, N. M. Language interference in the linguodidactic aspect . Pedagogical IMAGE, no. 3, pp. 71–78, 2018. (In Rus.)
12. Bezkorovaynaya, G. T. The concept of \"gentleman\" in English and French linguocultures: a comparative analysis. Bulletin of the Cherepovets State University, no. 3, pp. 61–65, 2014. (In Rus.)
13. Efimova, A. D. The use of the method of conceptual analysis in teaching a foreign language at a university (on the example of the linguistic and cultural concept “gentleman\").Teacher of the XXI century. 2020: 126–135. (In Rus.)
14. Debrenn, M. Project \"French Associative dictionary 2.0\". Question of psycholinguistics, no. 35, pp. 150–166, 2018. (In Rus.)
15. Dmitryuk, N. V., Associative dictionaries in Kazakhstan and Kazakhstani psycholinguistic studies . Questions of psycholinguistics, no. 1, pp. 140–161, 2020. (In Rus.)
16. Rubinshteyn, S. L., Fundamentals of general psychology. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2008. (In Rus.)
17. Burmistrova, T. A., Associative-verbal potential of the village lexeme: lexicographic codification and textual implementations. Scientific notes of the Orel State University, no. 5, pp. 192–195, 2014. (In Rus.)
18. Vasil\'eva, G. M., Yan, Kh. Lexeme intellectual in explanatory dictionaries of Russian and Chinese languages: a comparative description. Bulletin of the Russian State Pedagogical University. A. I. Herzen, no. 184, pp. 44–50, 2017. (In Rus.)
19. Karaulov, Yu. N. Russian language and language personality. M: Nauka, 1987. (In Rus.).
20. Gachev, G. D., Cosmo-Psycho-Logos: national images of the world. M, 2007: 10–11. (In Rus.)
21. Martinovich, G. A., Text and experiment: the study of the communicative and thematic field in the Russian language. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGUP, 2008. (In Rus.) |