Article
Article name The Analogy Method as an Element of Research Work of Junior Students
Authors Geyn A.G.Doctor of Pedagogy, Candidate of Physics and Mathematics a.g.geyn@urfu.ru
Knysh A.A.Senior Lecturer knysh.alla84@gmail.com
Bibliographic description Geyn A. G., Knysh A. A. The Analogy Method as an Element of Research Work of Junior Students // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. 2024. Vol. 19, no. 3. P. 6–16. DOI: 10.21209/2658-7114-2024-19-3-6-16.
Section
DOI 10.21209/2658-7114-2024-19-3-6-16
UDK 78.147
Article type Original article
Annotation The article explores the possibility of increasing the efficiency of research work within the framework of lectures and practical classes for junior students. We have identified a contradiction between the potential of research work in the development of students’ research competencies in the process of teaching junior students and the insufficient development of productive methods for introducing research tools in addition to skills in working with sources of information and methods of conducting experimental work. We are talking about tools that allow you to identify objects of research, put forward and formulate hypotheses, test hypotheses, etc. The solution to the problem is realized through the developed methodology of lectures and practical classes, containing elements of intellectual tools of scientific activity in a systematic connection with the subject methodology. The method of analogy has been chosen as a specific tool for scientific activity. A system for assessing the levels of mastering the skills of intellectual tools of students’ scientific activities has been developed and an experimental test of the effectiveness of the developed methodology has been carried out. These methods, implemented for a higher mathematics course for non-core specialties, as well as algebra and mathematical analysis courses for mathematical and IT specialties, can be transferred to other disciplines of the theoretical cycle. This is the practical significance of the study.
Key words research activity, levels of research activity, analogy method, research methodology
Article information
References 1. Ippolitova, N. V., Sterkhova, N. S. Types and forms of organizing research activities of pedagogical university students. Bulletin of the Shadrinsky State Pedagogical University, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 2015. (In Rus.) 2. Golubeva, I. A. Research activities of students: an attempt to define. Scientists of the Crimean Federal University named after V. I. Vernadsky, no. 8, pp. 73–86, 2022. (In Rus.) 3. Karpov, A. O. Theoretical foundations of inquiry learning in the knowledge society. Pedagogika, no. 3, pp. 3–13, 2019. (In Rus.) 4. Humboldt, W. von. Uber die innere und aussere Organisation der hoheren wissenschaft lichen Anstalten in Berlin Grundungstexte. Berlin: Der Prasident der Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, 2010. (Auf Deut.) 5. Cubberley, E. P. Public School Administration: A Statement of the Fundamental Principles Underlying of the Organization and Administration of Public Education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin., 1976. (In Eng.) 6. Karpov, A. O. “Step into the Future” Program as a System of Non-formal Research Education in Russia, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Cham ZG: Springer, no. 785, pp. 15–21, 2018. (In Eng.) 7. Developing Foresight for the Development of Higher Education. Final Report of the Strata-Etan Expert Group. Brussels: European Commission, 2002. (In Eng.) 8. Winch, C. Developing Critical Rationality as a Pedagogical Aim. Journal of Philosophy Education, no. 38, pp. 28–39, 2004. (In Eng.) 9. Bykova, D. S. Methodology for teaching problem solving in a general education school mathematics course based on analogy and generalization Proceedings of the 7th International Conference Mathematics. Education. Culture. Tolyatti, 27–29 April 2015: 269–272. (In Rus.) 10. Kochagin, V. V. Methodological features of the use of analogy in a systematic course of stereometry. Cand. sci. diss. М: 1999. (In Rus.) 11. Vygotsky, L. S. Thinking and speech. M: Labirint, 1999. (In Rus.) 12. Lednov, V. S. Systematic approach in pedagogy. Metafizika, no. 4, pp. 39–51, 2014. (In Rus.) 13. Veyl, G. Mathematical thinking. M: Nauka,1989. (In Rus.) 14. Poyya, D. Mathematics and plausible reasoning. M: Nauka, 1989. (In Rus.) 15. Froydental, G. Mathematics as a pedagogical task. Part 1. M: Prosveshcheniye, 1982. (In Rus.) 16. Gein, A. G., Doronin, A. I., Frolov, A. A. Models of scientific productive thinking and the practice of its formation in the educational process. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Yekaterinburg. 26–27 October 2020: 50–56. (In Rus.) 17. Knysh, A. A. An example of creating a research context when solving linear programming problems. Questions of pedagogy, no. 11, pp. 223–226, 2021. (In Rus.) 18. Knysh, A. A. An example of the organization of scientific and research activity of students at a lecture on probability theory. Fundamental Mathematics and its Applications in Natural Sciences: Sputnik of the International Scientific Conference “Ufa Autumn Mathematical School-2021”: Abstracts of the XII International School-Conference of Students, graduate students and young scientists, Ufa, 06–09 October 2021. Ufa: ed. Bashkir state. University, 2021: 258–259. DOI: 10.33184/FMPVE-2021-10-06.179. (In Rus.) 19. Alekseyev, N. G., Leontyevich, A. V. Criteria for the effectiveness of teaching students research activities. M: Knorus, 2001. (In Rus.) 20. Askerova, L. N., Knysh, A. A. The role of practice-oriented tasks in the research activities of students majoring in Economics 38.03.01. Questions of Pedagogy, no. 5, pp. 19–22, 2021. (In Rus.) 21. Knysh, Ye. V., Knysh, A. A. Application of elements of strategic planning when a teacher organizes students’ research activities. Questions of pedagogy, no. 5, pp. 138–141, 2022. (In Rus.)
Full articleThe Analogy Method as an Element of Research Work of Junior Students