Article
Article name Theonymic Precedent in German Social Communication
Authors Kerimov R.D.Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor kerimovrus@rambler.ru
Fedyanina L.I.Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor fedianina@inbox.ru
Bibliographic description
Section
DOI
UDK 811.112.2’243
Article type
Annotation The paper examines the cognitive and semantic features of theomorphic metaphors in current German political communication. We present an analysis of the social roles religion plays as a key marker of social life in today’s world in general and in Germany in particular. In social communications, metaphors can be based on meanings of words that are fixed in the usage, in dictionaries, and in proverbs and sayings; on the other hand, metaphors can be based on creative occasional imagery which arise from the context of political speeches and the language of media. In the latter case, however, occasional metaphors are quite often built upon the usage meanings, whose scope is invigorated, expanded and augmented. German conceptual metaphor describes various political and economic aspects in the life of the state and the society in Germany, reflecting the stereotypes and concepts of Germany’s political culture and language in general. The theomorphic source domain of German political metaphor covers a range of concepts from Christianity (to a greater extent) and from other, non-Christian religions (to a lesser extent) such as: names of prominent religious figures, biblical characters, stories and quotations from the Bible, and Christian cults. The paper discusses the theonymic nominations – the common realities of the religion and the names of the key religious figures – that are observed in Germany’s current social and political communication. We carry out cognitive linguistic analysis to identify and describe occasional as well as usage-based metaphors. The usage-based metaphors are primarily deployed to name a religion and its adherents. The occasional imagery denotes a variety of social, economic and political properties of the public agenda in today’s Germany, the European Union, and the rest of the world.
Key words theonym, theonymic metaphors, social communication, cognitive linguistics, conceptual domain, linguistic worldview, the German language.
Article information
References 1. Baranov A. N. Vvedenie v prikladnuyu lingvistiku: ucheb. posobie. M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. 360 s. 2. Kerimov R. D. Religioznye metafory v sotsial\'no-politicheskom diskurse // Lingvistika: Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie issledovaniya: sb. nauch. tr. / otv. red. A. G. Fomin. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2007. Vyp. 1. S. 72–84. 3. Kerimov R. D. Artefaktnaya metaforika v politicheskom diskurse FRG: ucheb.posobie / GOU VPO «Kemerovskii gosudarstvennyi universitet». Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2008. 168 s. 4. Kerimov R. D., Fedyanina L. I. Metaforizatsiya bibleizmov v nemetskoi sotsial\'noi kommunikatsii // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 2 (54). T. 2. S. 75–81. 5. Kerimov R. D., Fedyanina L. I. Nemetskii tekst Biblii kak istochnik metaforicheskoi antroponimiki // Sovremennye napravleniya analiza i interpretatsii inokul\'turnykh tekstov: sbornik nauchnykh trudov III Vserossiiskoi shkoly-seminara (Tomsk, 03–05 aprelya 2013 g.) / otv. red. Yu. V. Kobenko. Tomsk: Izd-vo TPU, 2013. S. 44–52. 6. Maslova V. A. Kognitivnaya lingvistika: ucheb. posobie. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. Minsk: TetraSistems, 2008. 272 s. 7. Fedyanina L. I. Kontsept Geld v nemetskoi yazykovoi kartine mira: Opyt kontseptual\'nogo analiza: uch. posobie. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2008. 160 s. 8. Chudinov A. P. Rossiya v metaforicheskom zerkale: kognitivnoe issledovanie politicheskoi metafory (1991–2000): monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGPU, 2001. 240 s. 9. Andres G. Der Kombilohn ist kein Königsweg // Das Parlament. 1998. Nr. 31. 24. Juli. S. 7. 10. BZ (Zeitung). Berlin (Deutschland). 2001. 11. Luft Ch. Bundesregierung legt Testament vor // Das Parlament. 1998. Nr. 38. 11. September. S. 9. 12. Rau J. Reden und Interviews. Berlin: Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung, 2000. Bd. 1.1. 336 S. 13. Rau J. Reden und Interviews. Berlin: Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung, 2001. Bd. 2.2. 512 S. 14. Rau J. Reden und Interviews. Berlin: Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung, 2002. Bd. 3.1. 480 S. 15. Rau J. Reden und Interviews. Berlin: Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung, 2002. Bd. 3.2. 672 S. 16. Schreiner O. Es kommt nur noch heiβe Luft // Das Parlament. 1998. Nr. 31. 24. Juli. S. 7–8. 17. Spiegel‘ das deutsche Nachrichtenmagazin (Zeitschrift). Hamburg (Deutschland). 1967. Nr. 7. S. 70. 18. Spiegel‘ das deutsche Nachrichtenmagazin (Zeitschrift). Hamburg (Deutschland). 1977. Nr. 45. S. 57. Spisok slovarei i ikh sokrashchenii: 1. Brockhaus – Brockhaus-Die Enzyklopädie: In 24 Bd. – 20., überarb. Und aktual. Aufl. – Leipzig; Mannheim: Brockhaus, 1996–1999. 2. CUGDR – Compact Universal Groβwörterbuch deutsche Rechtschreibung / Chefred. A. Sendlinger. München: Compact Verlag, 2007. 3. DGWDS – Duden, Das groβe Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache: In 10 Bd. / Hrsg. Vom Wissenschaftlichen Rat der Dudenredaktion. 3., völlig neu bearb. Und erw. Aufl. Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, Zürich: Dudenverlag, 1999.
Full articleTheonymic Precedent in German Social Communication