Article |
---|
Article name |
Peculiarities of Ethnic Auto- and Heterostereotypes of the Population in the Zabaikalsky Krai |
Authors |
Bolshakova O.B. Graduate Student, olesyabolshakova@yandex.ru |
Bibliographic description |
|
Section |
Social and Educational Psychology |
UDK |
88 |
DOI |
|
Article type |
|
Annotation |
People’s interethnic perception of each other is one of the key aspects of understanding and effective
interacting of the representatives of different cultures. Ethnic stereotypes are considered to be
an important component of interethnic perceptions. The article presents the analysis of the results of
an empirical study of auto- and heterostereotypes of the population in the Zabaikalsky Krai. As a diagnostic
tool the study uses G. U. Soldatova’s “Diagnostic Test of Attitudes.” The results of the research
show that the respondents evaluate positively their own actions, attitudes and personal qualities. This
fact indicates the predominance of positive autostereotypes in the minds of the respondents. Among the
representatives of other nationalities residing outside of Russia, the greatest interest in the Chinese is
observed due to the proximity of China’s border and the opportunity to enter the territory of this country,
learn about its traditions and customs and communicate with the representatives of this nationality.
To a lesser extent the respondents are interested in personal qualities and attitudes of Americans and
Germans, because of occasional contacts with the representatives of these nationalities and, consequently,
lack of clear understanding their mentality features.
|
Key words |
ethnic stereotypes, autostereotypes, heterostereotypes, interethnic perception, personal
qualities, attitudes, Russians, Buryats, representatives of other nationalities, Chinese, Germans, Americans. |
Article information |
|
References |
1. Allik Ju., Myttus R., Realo A. i dr. Konstruirovanie nacional’nogo haraktera: svojstva lichnosti,
pripisyvaemye tipichnomu russkomu // Kul\'turno-istoricheskaja psiho-logija. 2009. № 1. C. 2–18.
2. Antonov V. I., Jampilova Z. S. Problema stereotipov kak odin iz bar\'erov v kontekste kommunikacii
kul\'tur // Rossija i Zapad: dialog kul\'tur. Vyp. 7. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1999. S. 31–39.
3. Bodalev A. A. Poznanie cheloveka chelovekom. SPb.: Rech\', 2005. 324 s.
4. Buchek A. A. Polijetnichnaja sreda i ejo vlijanie na jetnicheskoe samosoznanie lichnosti //
Psihologicheskie issledovanija: jelektron. nauch. zhurn. 2011. № 5(19). URL: http://psystudy.ru (data
obrawenija: 18.01.2012).
5. Grushevickaja T. G., Popkov V. D., Sadohin A. P. Osnovy mezhkul\'turnoj kommunika-cii. M.:
JuNITI-DANA, 2002. 352 s.
6. Karnyshev A. D., Vinokurov M. A. Jetnokul\'turnye tradicii i innovacii v jekonomi-cheskoj
psihologii. M.: Institut psihologii RAN, 2010. 480 s.
7. Karnyshev A. D., Vinokurov M. A., Trofimova E. L. Mezhjetnicheskoe vzaimodejstvie i
mezhkul\'turnaja kompetentnost\'. Irkutsk: Izd-vo BGUJeP, 2009. 310 s.
8. Karnyshev A. D., Kostin A. K., Ivanova E. A. Voprosy mezhjetnicheskogo vzaimodejstvija i
mezhkul\'turnoj kompetentnosti. Irkutsk: BGUJeP, 2008. 104 s.
9. Lebedeva N. M. Vvedenie v jetnicheskuju i krosskul\'turnuju psihologiju: ucheb. poso-bie. M.:
Kljuch-S, 1999. 224 s.
10. Rakitina O. V., Bagdasarjan L. M. Osobennosti mezhjetnicheskih avto- i getero-stereotipov //
Jaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik. 2008. № 4. S. 138–144.
11. Tansahaeva A. S., Tansahaeva S. S. Burjatskie narodnye tradicii kak social\'-no-pedagogicheskoe
javlenie. Ulan-Udje, 2003. 61 s.
12. Trofimova E. L., Karnyshev A. D. Metody issledovanija i optimizacii mezhjet-nicheskogo
vzaimodejstvija. Irkutsk: Izd-vo BGUJeP, 2007. 224 s. |
Full article | Peculiarities of Ethnic Auto- and Heterostereotypes of the Population in the Zabaikalsky Krai |