Article |
---|
Article name |
Theory of Ecologically Focused Anthropocentrism |
Authors |
Zakharova Y.Y. Candidate of Philosophy, Associate professor, aglena_72@mail.ru |
Bibliographic description |
|
Section |
PHILOSOPHY |
UDK |
101.1:316 |
DOI |
|
Article type |
|
Annotation |
The author has offered a theory of ecologically focused anthropocentrism which, along with
the theory of optimization of functioning of all spheres of socio-natural ecosystem for achieving
co-evolution of nature and society, is included into the concept of ecological culture of socio-natural
ecosystem. The author has proved the prospects of use of the concept of ecological culture of
socio-natural ecosystem in overcoming stereotypes of anthropocentrism understanding as a source
of environmental problems, its new treatment as directed collective activities for development of
the optimum administrative decisions promoting harmonization of the relations between society and
nature on the basis of collective reason and intelligence. The theory of ecologically focused anthropocentrism
defining axiological bases of ecological culture of socio-natural ecosystem includes new
humanity and ecological ethics ideas. The new humanity defining the relation to the person as the
supreme value, at the same time, is an ecological form of the world outlook based on understanding
of possibility of joint ecological crisis overcoming, including self-restriction. The ideas of ecological
ethics maintain self-worth of nature and introduction of nature into the system of values.
|
Key words |
anthropocentrism, ecologically focused anthropocentrism, nonanthropocentrism,
naturecentrism, new humanism, ecological ethics. |
Article information |
|
References |
1. Apresjan R. G. Dilemma antropocentrizma i nonantropocentrizma i ejo znachenie dlja
moral’noj filosofii // Filosofija v dialoge kul’tur: materialy Vsemirnogo dnja filosofii. M.: Progress-
Tradicija, 2010. S. 1131–1141.
2. Girusov Je. V. GJekologija i jekonomika prirodopol’zovanija / Je. V. Girusov, S. N. Bobylev,
A. L. Novoselov [i dr.]; pod red. Je. V. Girusova. M.: JuNITI-DATA, 2010. 607 s.
3. Gorlachjov V. P., Bernjukevich T. V. Russkij kosmizm kak javlenie kul’tury // Gumanitarnyj
vektor. 2012. № 3. S. 30–35.
4. Zaharova E. Ju., Shhetkina I. A. Jekologicheskaja kul’tura kak sostavljajushhaja social’noj
bezopasnosti obshhestva // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i juridicheskie nauki, kul’turologija
i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2013. № 1 (27). S. 88–93.
5. Liga M. B. Kachestvo okruzhajushhej sredy kak osnova dostojnogo kachestva zhizni.
Social’nye processy v sovremennoj Zapadnoj Sibiri: sb. nauch. st. Gorno-Altajsk: GAGU, 2011.
S. 148–152.
6. Liseev I. K. Jenvajromental’noe myshlenie kak imperativnyj faktor ponimanija global’nogo
mira // Filosofija v dialoge kul’tur: Materialy Vsemirnogo dnja filosofii. M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2010.
S. 1054–1062.
7. Mantatova L. V. Filosofskie perspektivy ustojchivogo razvitija informacionnogo obshhestva.
Ulan-Udje: Izd-vo Burjat. gos. un-ta, 2002. 242 s.
8. Pechchei A. Chelovecheskie kachestva. M.: Nauka, 1986. 230 s.
9. Subbotina N. D. Problema sootnoshenija estestvennogo i social’nogo v obshhestve
i cheloveke // Vestn. Burjatskogo gos. un-ta. Serija V. Filosofija. Sociologija. Kul’turologija.
Ulan-Udje. 2002. Vyp. VI. S. 16–32.
10. Frolov I. T. Filosofija global’nyh problem // Vopr. filosofii. 1980. № 2. C. 42–49.
11. Shvejcer A. Blagogovenie pered zhizn’ju. M.: Nauka, 1982. 290 s.
12. Foreman D. Confessions of an Eco-Warrior. New York: Harmony Books, 1991. 214 r.
13. Manes C. Green Rage: Radical Envairomentalizm and the Unmaking of civilization.
Boston: Little Brown, 1990. 198 r. |
Full article | Theory of Ecologically Focused Anthropocentrism |