| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
Modern Russian art Culture: Novelty of Visualization |
| Authors |
Bagauv Y.D. postgraduate student, juliabagauv86@mail.ruBekisheva A.V. Assistant, a_bekisheva@mail.ruKuz’mina M.Y. Assistant, marinabaksh1@rambler.ruLyashenko E.S. Junior Researcher, kreativfho@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
|
| Section |
CULTUROLOGY |
| UDK |
008 |
| DOI |
|
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
The paper is devoted to research of tendencies of modern art culture development in Russia,
that is characterized by a new language of visualization of meanings. Topicality of the research is
determined by asymmetry of development of new visual technologies and insufficient content of national images. The basis of appearance of new forms of visualization such as electronic folklore,
installations, performances, electronic images, computer cinema installation in cinema, animations,
visual-graphic practices,etc. is perfection of techniques which contribute to mass consumption,
distribution, acceleration of transmission of information in visual culture. The authors propose a
project which contributes to the research, classification and detection of regularities, principles and
fundamental tendencies of the new forms of language in modern art culture, assimilation of new
possibilities in the visual language. Ways of theoretical comprehension of new visual images and
design of theoretical models directed to estimate the tendencies of development in the visual language
in modern Russian art culture are analyzed. The main approach of research is cultural and semiotic
analysis of forms of visualization appearance in modern art culture, a semiotic method contributes to
a comprehensive study of semantics problem in modern forms of visualization.
|
| Key words |
visualization, the language of culture, Russian art culture, electronic image, cultural
meaning, visual message. |
| Article information |
|
| References |
1. Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Pojetika. M.: Progress, 1989. 616 s.
2. Ben’jamin V. Kratkaja istorija fotografii // Proizvedenie iskusstva v jepohu ego tehnicheskoj
vosproizvodimosti. M.: Medium, 1996. 240 s.
3. Gornyh A. A., Usmanova A. R. Jestetika interneta i vizual’noe potreblenie: k voprosu o
sushhnosti i specifike Runeta // Control + Shift: publichnoe i lichnoe v russkom Internete: sb. st. / pod
red.: N. A. Konradovoj, Je. Shmidt, K. Tojbiner. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2009. S . 261–284.
4. Gubanova E. N. Semantika prostranstva v postmodernistskom hudozhestvennom tekste:
dis. … kand. filos. nauk. M., 2009. 159 s.
5. Dianova V. M. Postmodernistskaja filosofija iskusstva: istoki i sovremennost’. SPb.:
Petropolis, 1999. 240 s.
6. Lotman Ju. M. Semiosfera: Kul’tura i vzryv. Vnutri mysljashhih mirov. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb,
2000. 704 s.
7. Markov B. V. Chelovek i jazyk // Semiotika XXI veka: chelovek v mire znakov: materialy
virtual’nogo kollokviuma. URL: http://www.culturalnet.ru/f/viewtopic.php?id=1559 (data
obrashhenija: 20.02. 2011).
8. Man’kovskaja N. B. Jestetika postmodernizma. SPb.: Aletejja, 2000. 347 s.
9. Petrovskaja E. V. Antifotografija. M.: Tri kvadrata, 2003. 112 s.
10. Podoroga V. Nepred#javlennaja fotografija. Zametki po povodu «Svetloj komnaty»
R. Barta // Avtobiografija. K voprosu o metode. Tetradi po analiticheskoj antropologii. № 1. M.:
Logos, 2001, s. 195–240.
11. Poznin V.F. Vyrazitel’nye sredstva jekrannyh iskusstv. Jesteticheskij i tehnologicheskij
aspekty. 17.00.09: avtoref. dis. … d-ra iskusstvovedenija. SPb.: 2009. 40 s.
12. Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto. M.: Respublika, 2000. 639 s.
13. Sergeev D. V. Struktura kul’turnogo smysla i zakony ego funkcionirovanija // Lichnost’.
Kul’tura. Obshhestvo. 2008. № 3–4. S. 257–267.
14. Stor I. N. Smysloobrazovanie v graficheskom dizajne. Metamorfozy zritel’nyh obrazov.
M.: MGTU im. A.N. Kosygina, 2003. 296 s.
15. Chernevich E. V. Issledovanie jazyka graficheskogo dizajna: dis. ... kand. iskusstvovedenija:
17.00.06. M.: RGB, 2002.
16. Jejzenshtejn S. Montazh. M.: Muzej kino, 2000. 592 s.
17. Teitelbaum M. Montage and Modern Life: 1919–1942. The Institute of Contemporary Art,
Boston. 1992. 208 r. |
| Full article | Modern Russian art Culture: Novelty of Visualization |
