| Annotation |
The author proves the necessity to study students’ subjectivity because youth is the main resource
when it comes to thinking of positive social development. It was possible to show conflict
between social requirements for student’s subjectivity level and the degree of actual display of this integrative property. Subjectivity is human ability to properly determine someone’s time perspective.
It is impossible to predict and plan someone’s own life without real linear time modeling. The author
supplements the paper with results of empirical study of the students’ time perspective showing different
subjectivity level. She applies eco-psychology approach focusing her attention on analyzing
subjectivity formation on different stages of ontogenesis (V. I. Panov). Mental activity, activity of subject
and subjectivity are different manifestations of the unified, in its nature, psyche. It is a process of
psyche acquiring its actual form of existence in the formation of subject’s mental activity-functioning.
Testing was an empirical method of the study. The level of subjective control, vitality, self-regulation
in learning activity and the level of ego autonomy were the measurements to diagnose the students’
subjectivity. According to the research results, it was found that there is moderate connection between
the students’ subjectivity performance and the students’ time perspective indicators. The closest
connection is revealed between subjective control indices and time decentration indicators. Time
perspective indicators of the students showing different subjectivity level are not the same. Students
showing high subjectivity level tend to be rather future-oriented. Students showing low subjectivity
level have less expressed orientation on the future. The significant difference is proved with the help
of mathematical data treatment.
|
| References |
1. Abul’khanova K. A. O sub»ekte psikhicheskoi deyatel’nosti: metodologicheskie problemy
psikhologii. M.: Nauka, 1973. 288 s.
2. Abul’khanova K. A., Berezina T. N. Vremya lichnosti i vremya zhizni. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2001.
304 s.
3. Alekseeva L. V. Psikhologiya sub»ekta i sub»ekta prestupleniya: monografiya. Tyumen’: Izdvo
TyumGU, 2004. 520 s.
4. Anan’ev B. G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya. SPb.: Piter, 2001. 288 s.
5. Antsyferova L. I. Psikhologicheskoe soderzhanie fenomena «sub»ekt» i granitsy
sub»ektno-deyatel’nostnogo podkhoda // Problema sub»ekta v psikhologicheskoi nauke / pod red.
A. V. Brushlinskogo, M. I. Volovikovoi, V. N. Druzhinina. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000. S. 27–42.
6. Asmolov A. G. Psikhologiya lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1990. 367 s.
7. Bozhovich L. I. Lichnost’ i ee formirovanie v detskom vozraste. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1968.
464 s.
8. Brushlinskii A. V. Psikhologiya sub»ekta / otv. red. V. V. Znakov. M.: In-t psikhologii RAN;
SPb.: Aleteiya, 2002. 272 s.
9. Volkova E. N. Sub»ektnost’ pedagoga: teoriya i praktika: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra psikhol. nauk.
M., 1998. 50 s.
10. Znakov V. V. Psikhologiya sub»ekta kak metodologiya ponimaniya chelovecheskogo bytiya //
Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. T. 24. № 2. S. 95–106.
11. Konopkin O. A. Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy regulyatsii deyatel’nosti. M.: Izd-vo URSS,
2011. 320 s.
12. Kudryavtsev V. T., Urazalieva G. K. Sub»ekt deyatel’nosti v ontogeneze // Vopr. psikhologii.
2001. № 4. S. 14–30.
13. Leont’ev A. N. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie proizvedeniya: v 2 t. T. 2. M.: Genezis, 2003.
400 s.
14. Menegetti A. Uchebnik po ontopsikhologii. M.: Ontopsikhologiya, 2007. 608 s.
15. Osnitskii A. K. Problemy issledovaniya sub»ektnoi aktivnosti // Vopr. psikhologii. 1996. №1.
S. 5–19.
16. Panov V. I. Ot aktivnosti k stanovleniyu deyatel’nosti, ot sub»ekta k stanovleniyu sub»ektnosti
(teoreticheskii analiz) // Problemy i perspektivy sotsial’noi psikhologii obrazovaniya: materialy
Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Saratov, 26–27 oktyabrya 2010 g.). Saratov: Nauka, 2010, Ch. 1.
S. 13–27
17. Petrovskii V. A. Lichnost’ v psikhologii: paradigma sub»ektnosti. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 1996.
512 s.
18. Rubinshtein S. L. Problemy obshchei psikhologii. M.: Pedagogika, 1973. Ch. II. 423 s.
19. Ryabikina Z. I. Lichnost’ kak sub»ekt bytiya i sobytiya: psikhologicheskii aspekt analiza //
Sub»ekt, lichnost’ i psikhologiya chelovecheskogo bytiya / pod red. V. V. Znakova i Z. I. Ryabikinoi.
M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2005. C. 5–22.
20. Selivanov V. V. Svoistva sub»ekta i ego zhiznennyi tsikl // Psikhologiya individual’nogo
i gruppovogo sub»ekta / pod red. A.V. Brushlinskogo. M.: IP RAN, 2002. S. 310–328.
21. Sergienko E. A. Sistemno-sub»ektnyi podkhod: obosnovanie i perspektiva // Psikhologicheskii
zhurnal. 2011. T. 32. № 1. S. 120–132.
22. Slobodchikov V. I., Isaev E. I. Osnovy psikhologicheskoi antropologii. Psikhologiya cheloveka:
Vvedenie v psikhologiyu sub»ektivnosti: ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov. M.: Shkola-Press, 1995. 384 s.
23. Tatenko V. A. Psikhologiya v sub»ektnom izmerenii: monografiya. Kiev: Prosvita, 1996.
404 s.
24. Tkhostov A. Sh. Topologiya sub»ekta (Opyt fenomenologicheskogo issledovaniya) // Vestn.
Mosk. un-ta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya. 1994. № 2. S. 3–13.
25. Tkhostov A. Sh. Topologiya sub»ekta (Opyt fenomenologicheskogo issledovaniya) // Vestn.
Mosk. un-ta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya. 1994. № 3. S. 3–12.
26. Uznadze D. N. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. M.: Nauka, 1966. 450 s.
27. Fel’dshtein D. I. Psikhologiya razvitiya cheloveka kak lichnosti: Izbr. tr.: v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Izd-vo
MPSI; Voronezh: MODEK, 2005. 568 s.
28. Kharlamenkova N. E. Samoutverzhdenie podrostka. 2-oe izd. M.: In-t psikhologii RAN,
2007. 384 s.
29. Tsukerman G. A. Opyt tipologicheskogo analiza mladshikh shkol’nikov kak sub»ektov
uchebnoi deyatel’nosti // Vopr. psikhologii. 1999. № 6. S. 3–18.
30. Chudnovskii V. E. K probleme sootnosheniya «vneshnego» i «vnutrennego» v psikhologii //
Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1993. № 5. S.3–12. |
