Article
Article name The Importance of Language Expression Research Concerning Family Scripts for the Theory of Language
Authors Krasheninnikova I.V. Competitor, irino4ka90@list.ru
Bibliographic description
Section Russian Philology
UDK 81
DOI
Article type
Annotation This article deals with the meaning of language expression of family scripts for the theory of language. Language expression of family scripts is thought as current attitudes, values and views about family relationships that are kept as sentences and phrases in our mind. And it is also important how they are developed in speech. At the speech level family scripts have the form of fixed phrases or sentences associated with body of knowledge about family which exists in every person’s mind. Studying of language expression of family scripts has a lot to do with different questions which have linguistic and psycholinguistic nature and can make a contribution to the development of such approaches as language and speech, language and thought, semantics of syntax, lexical semantics, phono-semantics, and sociolinguistics. Thus, the problem presented in this article is relevant for the general theory of language. The purpose of this article is substantiation correlation of represented problem with general-theoretical linguistics problems. The specific of the article is in the following: methodologically important differentiation of such linguistic research levels as \"thought – language in its proper meaning – psychophysiology – speech – communication\" is used in it. The descriptive method of research is used.
Key words family script, language, speech, thought, psycholinguistics, constructability, destructiveness, cultural linguistics, phono-semantics.
Article information
References 1. Adam’yants T. Z. Sotsial’nye kommunikatsii. M.: Drofa, 2009. 208 s. 2. Apresyan Yu. D. O regulyarnoi mnogoznachnosti [Elektronnyi resurs] // Izv. AN SSSR. Otdelenie literatury i yazyka. M., 1971. T. 30. Vyp. 6. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.classes.ru/philology/apresyan-71.htm (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2014). 3. Bern E. Lyudi, kotorye igrayut v igry. M.: Eksmo, 2008. Kn. 2. 431 s. 4. Vorob’ev V. V. Lingvokul’turologiya (teoriya i metody). M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 1997. 331 s. 5. Gardiner A. Teoriya yazyka i rechi // Khrestomatiya po teoreticheskoi i prikladnoi ling-vistike. M., 1967. S. 95–96. 6. Gorelov I. N. Umeete li vy obshchat’sya? M.: Prosveshchenie, 1991. 144 s. 7. Dal’ V. I. Poslovitsy russkogo naroda. M.: Gos. izd-vo khud. lit., 1957. 990 s. 8. El’mslev L. Prolegomeny k teorii yazyka. Ser. «Lingvisticheskoe nasledie XX veka». M.: KomKniga, 2006. 248 s. 9. Zhinkin N. I. Rech’ kak provodnik informatsii. M.: Nauka, 1982. 156 s. 10. Zvegintsev V. A. Predlozhenie i ego otnoshenie k yazyku i rechi. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1976. 309 s. 11. Ivanitskii A. M. Psikhofiziologiya soznaniya // Psikhofiziologiya / pod red. Yu. I. Aleksandrova. SPb.: Piter, 2003. S. 200–217. 12. Kornienko A. F. Psikhofiziologicheskaya problema i varianty ee resheniya // Vestn. TGGPU. 2011. № 1 (23). S. 313–322. 13. Leont’ev A. N. Deyatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’. M.: Politizdat, 1975. 304 s. 14. Maslou A. Motivatsiya i lichnost’ / per. A. M. Tatlybaevoi. 2-e izd. SPb.: Evraziya, 1999. 181 s. 15. Puzyrev A. V. Anagrammy kak yavlenie yazyka: opyt sistemnogo osmysleniya. M.: Penza: In-t yazykoznaniya RAN: Penz. gos. ped. un-t im. V. G. Belinskogo, 1995. 379 s. 16. Puzyrev A. V. Yazyk i myshlenie: psikhologicheskie i lingvisticheskie aspekty: materi-aly VI Vseros. nauch. konf. (Ul’yanovsk, 17–20 maya 2006 g.) / otv. red. A. V. Puzyrev. M.: Ul’ya-novsk: In-t yazykoznaniya RAN: Ul’yan. gos. un-t, 2006. 243 s. 17. Puzyrev A. V. Prolegomeny k estetike yazyka i otsenka soderzhatel’noi osnovy masso-vykh pesen. Ul’yanovsk: UlGTU, 2010. 123 s. 18. Remneva M. L., Chernets L. V. Fonosemantika i ee predmet. Ponyatie o zvukopisi [Elek-tronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.philol.msu.ru/~tezaurus/ (data obrashcheniya: 06.08.2014). 19. Skrebnev Yu. M. Ocherk teorii stilistiki. Gor’kii: GGPIIYa, 1975. 175 s. 20. Sossyur F. Trudy po yazykoznaniyu. M.: Progress, 1977. 696 s. 21. Teliya V. N. Pervoocherednye zadachi i metodologicheskie problemy issledovaniya frazeologicheskogo sostava yazyka v kontekste kul’tury // Frazeologiya v kontekste kul’tury / otv. red. V. N. Teliya. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul’tury, 1999. S. 13–24. 22. Toich Dzh. M., Toich Ch. K. Vtoroe rozhdenie, ili Iskusstvo poznat’ i izmenit’ sebya: per. s angl. M.: SICh, 1998. 183 s. 23. Fromm E. Anatomiya chelovecheskoi destruktivnosti / per. s nem. E. Telyatnikovoi. M.: AST, 2004. 635 s. 24. Kharris R. Psikhologiya massovykh kommunikatsii. 4-e mezhdunar. izd. M.: Praim-Evroznak: Neva: Olma-Press, 2002. 420 s. 25. Chekhov A. P. Chelovek, kakov on est’. Rasskazy i povesti. P’esy. M.: AST: Astrel’, 2011. 1084 s. 26. Shakhovskii V. I. Kategorizatsiya emotsii v leksiko-semanticheskoi sisteme yazyka. Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2008. 208 s.
Full articleThe Importance of Language Expression Research Concerning Family Scripts for the Theory of Language