Article
Article name Features of Encapsulation Processes in Multivector Coordinates of Russian Society
Authors Firsov M. . Doctor of History, Professor, mihail_firsov@mail.ru
Yudina T.N. Doctor of Sociology, Professor, Head, ioudinatn@mail.ru
Chernikova A.A. Graduate Student, aannyy@yandex.ru
Bibliographic description Firsov M. V., Yudina T. N., Chernikova A. A. Features of Encapsulation Processes in Multivector Coordinates of Russian Society // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. Social Sciences Series. 2017. Vol. 12, No. 3. PP. 30–40. DOI: 10.21209/2500-171X-2017-12-3-30-40.
Section RUSSIAN SOCIETY TODAY
UDK 316.4.06
DOI 10.21209/2500-171X-2017-12-3-30-40
Article type
Annotation The institutionalization processes of modern Russian society affect all spheres of its development. In modern conditions, the new relations that are beginning to form between social groups and national communities require their systematic interpretation. Contemporary postmodern cognition looks for such forms of comprehension of multivector phenomena that would enable to go beyond the traditional schemes and “accepted” discourses of reality comprehension, since it is rather difficult to describe dynamic processes in one cognitive matrix. In this connection, social cognition uses various approaches to the reflection of emerging social processes. One of such approaches is cultural encapsulation, proposed by American researcher C. Gilbert Wrenn. Cultural encapsulation is widely used in counseling and therapy practice for understanding the specific features of ethnic clients social functioning in society. Social knowledge also uses this approach to describe the interaction of various ethnic groups in relation to ethnic and cultural issues. The article reveals different approaches to the description of the transformation of the Soviet matrix of encapsulation, its basic characteristics, features of functioning and its transition to the Russian model of cultural encapsulation.
Key words assimilation, encapsulation, collective encapsulation matrix, encapsulation types, institutionalization, marginalization, migration
Article information
References 1. Baranov N. A. Institutsionalizatsiya v Rossii: osobennosti natsional’noi modeli // Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS: nauch. zhurn. 2007. T. 3, № 4. S. 69–87. 2. Bakhtin M. M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. M.: Khudozh. lit., 1975. 504 s. 3. Bessonova O. E. Obraz budushchego Rossii i kod tsivilizatsionnogo razvitiya. Novosibirsk: IEiOPP SO RAN, 2007. 123 s. 4. Zhyuliar Zh. Kruglyi stol. Kapitalizm i lishenie svobody// Intellektualy i vlast’: izbrannye politicheskie stat’i, vystupleniya, interv’yu / M. Fuko. M.: Praksis, 2005. Ch. 2. 320 s. 5. Kuropyatnik M. S. Kul’turnaya inkapsulyatsiya: konteksty i interpretatsii sotsiokul’turnykh protses- sov // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2015. Ser. 12, vyp. 3. S. 135–141. 6. Merton R. Sotsial’naya teoriya i sotsial’naya struktura. M.: AST, 2006. 880 s. 7. Pavlenko V. N. Akkul’turatsionnye strategii i modeli transformatsii identichnosti u migrantov // Psikhologiya bezhentsev i vynuzhdennykh pereselentsev: opyt issledovanii i prakticheskoi raboty. M.: Smysl, 2001. S. 25–40. 8. Pantin V. I., Lapkin V. V. Transformatsiya natsional’no-tsivilizatsionnoi identichnosti sovremennogo rossiiskogo obshchestva: problemy i perspektivy // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2004. № 1. 9. Soldatova G. U. Sotsiokul’turnyi podkhod v prakticheskoi psikhologii vynuzhdennoi migratsii // Psikhologiya bezhentsev i vynuzhdennykh pereselentsev: opyt issledovanii i prakticheskoi raboty. M.: Smysl, 2001. 279 s. 10. Fuko M. Bezopasnost’, territoriya, naselenie: kurs lektsii, prochitannyi v Kolezh de Frans v 1977–1978 uchebnom godu. SPb.: Nauka, 2011. 544 c. 11. Eliade M. Istoriya very i religioznykh idei: ot kamennogo veka do elevsinskikh misterii. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2008. 634 c. 12. Arredondo P., Perez P. Expanding multicultural competence through social justice leadership // The Counseling Psychologist 2003. No. 31. Pp. 282–289. 13. Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997. 25 p. 14. Firsov M., Sizikova V., larionov A., Chernikova A. Social work within the structure of socialorien- ted confessional education // Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science. 2017. No. 9. Pp. 65–75. 15. Goldhammer А. The Future of French Culture // French Politics, Culture & Society. 2010. Vol. 28, No. 3. Pp. 97–113. 16. Greil А., Rudy D. Social Cocoons: Encapsulation and Identity Transformation Organizations/ Sociological Inquiry. 2007. January. Pp. 62–71. 17. Kanbur R., Pirttila J., Tuomala M. Non-welfarist optimal taxation and behavioural public economics // Journal of Economic Surveys. 2006. Vol. 20, No. 5. December. Pp. 849–868. 18. Molodikova I. N., Yudina T. N. Migration strategies of Ukrainian migrants: EU or Russia // Contemporary Problems of Social Work. 2016. Т. 2, No. 3. Pp. 62–71. 19. Ruben J. Echemendia Cultural encapsulation [Электронный ресурс] // Key Words in Multicultural Interventions A dictionary / ed. by J. S. Mio [et al.]. London: Greenwood press Westport, Connecticut, 1999. Режим доступа: http://www.daximeba.ru/xyga.pdf (дата обращения: 23.01.2017). 20. Sue D. W., Sue D. Counseling the culturally Diverse: Theory and practice (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2003. 21. Sue D. W., Sue D. Counseling the culturally Diverse: Theory and practice (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2007. Pp. 5–27. 22. Sue D. W., Sue S. Barriers to cross-cultural counselling // Journal of Counselling Psychology. 1977. No. 27. Pp. 420–429. 23. Pedersen P. A handbook for developing multicultural awareness (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association. 1994. 325 p. 24. Vera E., Speight S. L. Multicultural competence, social justice, and counseling psychology: Expanding our roles // The Counseling Psychologist. 2003. No. 31. Pp. 253–272.
Full articleFeatures of Encapsulation Processes in Multivector Coordinates of Russian Society