| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
Features of the Responsibility of Students of Higher Education Directions Psychology |
| Authors |
Tolstych L.R. Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor, TLR-TLR@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
Tolstykh L. R. Features of the Responsibility of Students of Higher Education Directions Psychology // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 4. PP. 103–107. DOI: 10.21209/2658-7114-2019-14-4-103-107. |
| Section |
Scientific Research |
| UDK |
378.035+378.147 |
| DOI |
10.21209/2658-7114-2019-14-4-103-107 |
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
The relevance of the study is due to the increasing attraction of public attention to the intellectual,
personal and creative potential of the younger generation. A prerequisite for the formation
of competencies and an active life position of graduates of higher education who are able to successfully integrate into the system of social relations is responsibility. Responsibility also serves as a criterion for assessing the identity of the system of relationships and interaction with other members of societies. It is known that the professional activity of the psychologist is based on the moral standards. Future psychologists should have a well-developed sense of responsibility, since they should be responsible for the consequences of their activities. This determines the relevance of the research topic. In order to study the characteristics of students’ responsibility, the following methods were used: theoretical, psychodiagnostic, the method of mathematical-statistical data processing (Mann – Whitney U-test). The psychodiagnostic method is presented by the methods: “Diagnosis of responsibility” (by V. P. Pryadein), the method of multifactor personality research by R. Kettell, the method of studying self-relation (IIA test questionnaire) V. V. Stolin and S. R. Panteleeva, “The scale of control over the action” Yu. Kul (ACS). The levels and the corresponding features of responsibility among students-psychologists were singled out. The peculiarities of responsibility of the students-psychologists are analyzed by the content of the regulatory-dynamic and motivational-
semantic components. Responsibility was considered in the framework of the study of personality traits, holistic self-attitude and behavior, ensuring the subject’s readiness to undertake obligations and to fulfill them qualitatively. Features motivational – semantic component with a high level of responsibility: sociocentricity, objectivity, meaningfulness and awareness have been analyzed. With a low level of responsibility: self-centeredness and subjectivity have been identified. Features of the regulatory-dynamic component of responsibility – ergichnost, stenichnost with a high level of responsibility, with a low level – airgichnost, asthenia have been stated. Features of self-attitude of psychology students with a high level of responsibility – self-acceptance and self-understanding self-esteem, with a low level – self-accusation and self-guidance, expectation of a positive attitude of others have been pointed out.
|
| Key words |
responsibility, personality, higher education, value attitude, duty, choice of profession, norms, morality |
| Article information |
|
| References |
1. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, K. A. Life strategy. M.: Mysl, 1997. (In Rus.)
2. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, K. A. The problem of personality in Psychology. Psychological science in Russia of the twentieth century, problems of theory and history. M.: Publishing House of IP RAS, 1997. (In Rus.)
3. Baranovskaya, L. А. Formation of student social responsibility in the socio-cultural educational space. Dr. ped. sci. diss. Chita, 2011. (In Rus.)
4. Dementiy, L. I. Responsibility: typology and personal bases: monograph. Omsk: Omsk. state univ., 2001. (In Rus.)
5. Dementiy, L. I. Responsibility as a resource of personality: monograph. M.: Inform-Knowledge, 2005. (In Rus.)
6. Muzdybaev, K. Psychology of responsibility. Leningrad: Science, 1983. (In Rus.)
7. Pryadein, V. P. Responsibility as a Systemic Personality Quality. Yekaterinburg: Ur GPU, 2001. (In Rus.)
8. Pryadein, V. P. Responsibility as a subject of psychological research. Yekaterinburg, 2007. (In Rus.)
9. Stolyarenko, L. D. Features of student personality development. Rostov on Don, 1998. (In Rus.)
10. Tolstykh, L. R., Erdyneeva, K. G. Integrative approach to the professional responsibility of an engineer as a predictor of successful professional activity. Scientific Review. Ser. 2. Humanities, no. 5, pp. 48–51, 2010. (In Rus.)
11. Tolstykh, L. R., Erdyneeva, K. G. Responsibility in the conceptual basis of vocational education. Scientific Review. Ser. 2. Humanities. no. 2, pp. 78–84, 2010. (In Rus.)
12. Fomina, N. A. System of research on the responsibility of students, future managers. Pedagogy and Psychology as a resource for the development of modern society, no. 1, pp. 480–485, 2010. (In Rus.)
13. Shaldybina, O. N. On the subject of responsibility. M.: MNEPU, 2007 (In Rus.)
14. Shatunova, T. G. On the issue of identifying criteria and levels of responsibility formation in adolescents. Science and education, no. 2, pp. 87–89, 2005. (In Rus.)
15. Shepetko, D. V. Formation of professional responsibility of future specialists in the context of modern higher education modernization. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Orel, 2011. (In Rus.) |
| Full article | Features of the Responsibility of Students of Higher Education Directions Psychology |
