| Annotation |
The article presents the results of a study on the problem of integration in open educational space
as a factor of professional growth of future teachers on the basis of the unity of two complementary
theoretical approach: integrative and axiological. The authors substantiate the need to educate future
teachers for integration in educational system in the open educational space in accordance with professional
tasks and functions; substantiated and disclosed leading ideas and value-oriented guidelines for
preparing future teachers for this process as part of the interaction of teachers and students of various
profiles in pedagogical field. Interconnected and interdependent ideas that contribute to the professional
growth of future teachers are following: open educational space as a resource for personification of education,
providing broad variability and independence, taking into account the interests and capabilities
of students (openness, variability, independence and personification of education); the creation of professional
communities that promote professional dialogue and the growth, co-creation and cooperation
of subjects of education; integration in education as a whole and its implementation in various aspects
on the basis of humanistic values. The following values have been substantiated as priority ones for
the formation of the future teacher in an open educational space and digital economy: people and the
development of human capital; knowledge and ability of a person to master and operate it to solve problems;
collaboration in professional communities. The activity of subjects of education, determined by
values and value-oriented guidelines corresponding to the key ideas of educating future teachers, helps
students achieve educational results in accordance with requirements to modern teachers.
|
| References |
1. Actual problems of education: challenges and trends: monograph / K. G. Erdneyeva [et al.] Ed.
T. K. Klimenko. Chita: ZabSU, 2016. (In Rus.)
2. Berulava, M. N. The theoretical foundations of the integration of education. M.: Perfection, 1998. (In
Rus.)
3. Bordonskaya, L. A. Reflection of the relationship of science and culture in school physical education
and teacher training. Chita: Trans-Baikal State. gum.-ped. un-that, 2002. (In Rus.)
4. Galitsky, E. O. An integrative approach as a theoretical basis of the professional and personal
formation of the future teacher at the university. Dr. ped. sci. diss. Petersburg, 2002. (In Rus.)
5. Danilyuk, A. Ya. Theoretical and methodological foundations of integration in education: the experience
of theoretical didactics. Кand. ped. sci. diss. Rostov-na-Donu, 1997. (In Rus.)
6. Danilyuk, A. Ya. Theoretical and methodological foundations for the design of integrated humanitarian
educational spaces Dr. ped. sci. diss. Rostov-na-Donu, 2001. (In Rus.)
7. Dubitskaya, L. V. Methodological system for preparing a teacher for the implementation of pedagogical
integration in science education in secondary school students. Dr. ped. sci. diss. M., 2016. (In Rus.)
8. Zherebyatnikova, G. V. Formation of the creative activity of future teachers in the educational space
of a modern university. Cand. ped. sci. diss. abstr. Chita, 2013. (In Rus.)
9. Igumnova, E. A. Dialogical interaction – the vector of development of modern education. Pedagogical
image, no. 3, pp. 8–15, 2016. (In Rus.)
10. Igumnova, E. A., Radeckaya, I. V. Designing an educational quest based on a technological map.
Biology at school, no. 6, pp. 31–40, 2016. (In Rus.)
11. Kiryakova, A. V. Value orientations of university education. Bulletin of OSU, no. 2, pp. 27–33. 2011.
(In Rus.)
12. Maksimova, V. N. Integration in the education system. St. Petersburg: LOIRO, 1999. (In Rus.)
13. Interdisciplinary integration in education. Chita, ZabGU, 2018. (In Rus.)
14. Savenkova, L., Nikitina, A. Modern understanding of the problems of integration in education.
Teacher’s newspaper. 6 May, 2016. (In Rus.)
15. Tryapitsyna, A. P., Pisareva, S. A. Modern methodological approaches to the study of teacher
education. Man and Education, no. 3, pp. 4–12, 2014. (In Rus.)
16. Khromenkov, P. A. Inter-scientific communication in the integration of teacher education of university
students. Dr. ped. sci. diss. M., 2010. (In Rus.)
17. Cherepanova, L. V. Project activities in teaching the Russian language. Russian literature, no. 5,
pp. 46–49, 2006.
18. Yavoruk, O. A. Theoretical and methodological foundations for the construction of integrated courses
in school science education. Dr. ped. sci. diss. abstr. Chelyabinsk, 2000. (In Rus.) |
