References |
1. Busygina, I. A. Psychological features of the influence of maternal deprivation on the personality of a
teenager. Psychology of personal interaction in modern society: Collection of materials of the I All-Russian
scientific and practical conference with international participation, Armavir, April 12, 2022. Cheboksary: Sreda,
2022: 174–177. (In Rus.)
2. Knyazeva, A. V. The role of the father in the development of the child’s personality. Child psychoanalysis:
past, present, future: Collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the international scientific and
practical conference dedicated to the 110th anniversary of the birth of F Dolto, St. Petersburg, November 06,
2018. St. Petersburg: Eastern European Institute of Psychoanalysis, 2019: 248–258. (In Rus.)
3. Rytsareva, T. V. Correlation of the symptomatic behavior of a teenager with the parameters of the family
system. Bulletin of the Kostroma State University, no. 2, 2014. Web. 20.03.2023. URL: https://cyberleninka.
ru/article/n/sootnoshenie-simptomoticheskogo-povedeniya-podrostka-s-parametrami-semeynoy-sistemy (In
Rus.)
4. Pita, A. A., Vasyagina, N. N. Dependence of the psychological safety of a child on the parameters of
the relationship between father and mother. Actual problems of personality psychology: Collection of scientific
papers. Volume Issue 17. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University, 2020: 135–145. (In Rus.)
5. Baeva, I. A. Psychological safety of the educational environment in the structure of the complex safety
of an educational organization. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, no. 6, pp. 12–18, 2017. (In Rus.)
6. Zhang, Y., Wan, M. The double-edged sword effect of psychological safety climate: a theoretical
framework https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/8015626. Team performance management,
vol. 27, iss. 5–6, pp. 1686–1693, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/TPM-01-2021-0005 (In Engl.)
7. Baeva, I. A., Laktionova, E. B., Gayazova, L. A., Kondakova, I. V. A model of psychological safety
of a teenager in an educational environment. Proceedings of the Russian State Pedagogical University.
A. I. Herzen, no. 194, pp. 7–18, 2019. (In Rus.)
8. Skripacheva, E. I. Influence of family education styles on prosocial behavior in preschool children.
Bulletin of the Grodno State University named after Yanka Kupala, no. 2, pp. 146–152, 2020. (In Rus.)
9. Pengpid, S., Peltzer, К. Associations of number of victimizations with mental health indicators and
health-risk behaviours among a nationally representative sample of in-school adolescents in Curaçao. Child
Abuse & Neglect, vol. 111, аrticle number 104831, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104831 (In
Engl.)
10. Efimova, N. S. Formation of personal security as a psychological and pedagogical problem.
Pedagogical news, no. 1, 2014. Web. 05.03.2023. URL: http://pedagogicnews.uni-ruse.bg (In Rus.)
11. Litvinova, A. V., Koteneva, A. V., Kokurin, A. V., Ivanov, V. S. Problems of psychological security
of a person in extreme conditions of life. Modern foreign psychology, no. 1, pp. 8–16, 2021. https://doi.
org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100101. (In Rus.)
12. Krasilo, A. I. Problems of diagnosing the psychological safety of the educational environment. Part 1.
Psychological science and education, no. 1, pp. 28–38, 2013. (In Rus.)
13. Sun, Y. P., Huang, J. T. Psychological capital and innovative behavior: Mediating effect
of psychological safety. Social behavior and personality, vol. 47, issue 9, аrticle number e8204, 2019. https://
doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8204 (In Engl.)
14. Verbina, G. G. Psychological security of the individual. Bulletin of the Chuvash University, no. 4,
pp. 196–202, 2013. (In Rus.)
15. Maliy, D. V., Yugfeld, I. A. Professional and personal qualities of a teacher in the field of designing a
psychologically safe educational environment. Modern problems of science and education, no. 5, pp. 238–
247, 2016. (In Rus.)
16. Ge, Y. Q. Psychological safety, employee voice, and work engagement. Social behavior and
personality, vol. 48, issue 3, аrticle number e8907, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8907 (In Engl.)
17. Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act. BMJ simulation & technology
enhanced learning, vol. 6, iss. 3, pp. 164–171, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000470 (In Engl.)
18. Baeva, I. A., Kondakova, I. V. Theoretical foundations of the model of psychological safety of
a teenager in the educational environment. Herzen readings: psychological research in education, no. 2,
pp. 91–98, 2019. https://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2019-2-10. (In Rus.)
19. Laktionova, E. B., Orlova, A. V., Kondakova, I. V., Tuzova, A. S. Attitude towards the educational
environment and psychological well-being of students in specialized and general education schools.
Pedagogical image, no. 3, pp. 500–515, 2020. (In Rus.)
20. Baeva, I. A., Laktionova, E. B., Gayazova, L. A., Kondakova, I. V. Model of the psychological safety
of a teenager in the educational environment. Proceedings of the Russian State Pedagogical University.
A. I. Herzen, no. 194, pp. 7–18, 2019. (In Rus.)
21. Smyk, Yu. V. The potential of psychological safety of a teacher as a condition for the psychological
safety of a student. Science for Education Today, no. 1, pp. 42–58, 2021. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-
6762.2101.03. (In Rus.) |