| Annotation |
The relevancy of the research is connected with the importance of the pedagogical community’s awareness
of the need to include the ideas of sustainable development in the content of the common education system,
on the one hand, and the insufficient research of the possibilities of the subject “Fine Arts” in solving this
problem, on the other hand. The theoretical bases of education for sustainable development prioritize their
philosophical, cultural, ecological, economic, sociological, pedagogical substantiation, while the significance
of art education is still underestimated. The article substantiates the importance of art in education for sustainable
development as a basis for transmitting moral, ethical and aesthetic values of the emerging culture of sustainable development to new generations. It is proved that the fine arts itself is at risk of disappearance
and destruction of traditional artistic practices, barriers to the reproduction of the cultural artistic heritage of the
peoples of Russia in the young generation. The analysis of the problems that arise in the teaching of fine arts
related to the algorithmic cognitive sphere of children in the globalization of digitalization processes is presented.
This inhibits the realization of natural innate cognitive abilities of a person. The necessity of changes in
art education of the young generation is substantiated, which should affect not only the educational process,
but also the structure, function, semantics of the teaching content to build value bridges between Human and
Nature, past and future, global and local, mind and heart to achieve a general goal – the survival of mankind.
It is concluded that the teaching of fine arts should become a necessary and integral component of education
for sustainable development. |
| References |
1. Savenkova, L. G. Modern trends of art education in Russia. Pedagogy of Art: electronic scientific
journal, no. 3, 2014. Web. 20.11.2023. http: //www.art-education.ru/AE-magazine. (In Rus.)
2. Visual arts and art education: collection of materials. Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo RGPU im. A. I. Gercena,
2022. (In Rus.)
3. Oparin, R. V. The art aspect in the context of the system of continuous environmental education of
schoolchildren. World of science, culture, education, no. 2, 2009. Web. 20.11.2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/
article/n/iskusstvovedcheskiy-aspekt-v-kontekste-sistemy-nepreryvnogo-ekologicheskogo-obrazovaniyashkolnikov.
(In Rus.)
4. Golovneva, E. V. The role of fine arts in children’s environmental education. NovaInfo, no. 74, 2017.
Web. 20.11.2023. https://novainfo.ru/article/14198. (In Rus.)
5. Benevolskaya, N. A. Environmental education of junior schoolchildren at the lessons of fine arts.
Primary School, no. 2, pp. 51–55, 2009. (In Rus.)
6. Pankina, M. V., Zaxarova, S. V. The role of continuous art education in the realization of the concept of
sustainable development. Lifelong learning: lifelong learning for sustainable development, no. 13, 2015. Web.
20.11.2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rol-nepreryvnogo-hudozhestvennogo-obrazovaniya-v-realizatsiikontseptsii-
ustoychivogo-razvitiya. (In Rus.)
7. Ry`zhikova, I. I. Art education of the individual for sustainable development of the society: to the
problem of training of pedagogical staff. Web. 20.11.2023: https://elib.bspu.by/bitstream/doc/22442/1/Рыжи-
кова.pdf?ysclid=lpapunhj59546092872. (In Rus.)
8. Road Map for Arts Education: The World Conference on Arts Education: Building Creative Capacities
for the 21st Century Lisbon, 6–9 March 2006. Web. 20.11.2023. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/
MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/CLT/pdf/Arts_Edu_RoadMap_en.pdf. (In Engl)
9. Seoul Agenda: Goals for the Development of Arts Educationis a major outcome of UNESCO’s Second
World Conference on Arts Education held in Seoul, the Republic of Korea, on 25–28 May 2010. Web. 20.11.2023.
http://www.unesco.org/new/fileamin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/CLT/pdf/Seoul_Agenda_EN.pdf. (In Engl.)
10. Strategic guidelines of art education development in CIS countries. Analytical review /
N. N. Yaroshenko (director), etc. Moscow State University of Culture and Arts. М., 2013. Web. 20.11.2023.
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002209/220952r.pdf (дата обращения: 25.11.2023). (In Rus.)
11. The Hangzhou Declaration on Culture and Sustainable Development Web. 20.11.2023. http://
unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002212/221238m.pdf. (In Engl.)
12. Culture in, for and as Sustainable Development: Conclusions from the COST Action IS1007:
Investigating Cultural Sustainability / by ed. J. Dessein, K. Soini, G. Fairclough, L. Horlings.COST. European
Co-operation in Science and Technology. Web. 20.11.2023. http://www.culturalsustainability.eu/conclusions.
pdf (In Engl.)
13. Mamedov, N. M. Ecology and sustainable development. M: MGADA, 2013. (In Rus.)
14. Vyatkin, B. A., Dorfman, L. Ya. S. Merlin’s theory of integral individuality: history and modernity.
Education and science, no. 2, pp. 145–160, 2017. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2017-2 V (In Rus.)
15. Karelov, S. About big changes in societies, states and individuals. And why we must be prepared
for even bigger changes. Web. 20.11.2023. https://zen.yandex.ru/media/the_world_is_not_easy/obolshihperemenah-
vobscestvah-gosudarstvah-i-lichnostiah-60d8bde0c9d05740d85f35e02. (In Rus.)
16. Ortega-i-Gasset X. The dehumanization of art. Dehumanization of art. Man: Image and essence.
Humanitarian aspects, no. 1, pp. 178–184, 2001. (In Rus.)
17. Shapinskaya, E. N. Culture in the Age of “Figures”: cultural meanings and aesthetic values. Culture
culture, no. 3, pp. 34–42, 2015. (In Rus.)
18. Wagner C. et al. Measuring algorithmically infused societies. Nature, vol. 595, pp. 197–204, 2021.
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03666-1. (In Engl.)
19. Ishhenko, E. N. Creativity in the digital environment: the metamorphosis of authorship. Creativity as
a national element: media and social activity: Collection of articles. SPb: Izd-vo SPbGE`U, 2018: 383–394.
(In Rus.)
20. Baranov, S. T. Technocratic thinking: myths and reality. Current issues in social sciences: sociology,
political science, philosophy, history, no. 38, 2014. Web. 20.11.2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/
tehnokraticheskoe-myshlenie-mify-i-realnost. (In Rus.)
21. Voyushina, M. P. Interdisciplinary Dialogue as a Strategic for Modern Education. UNIVERSUM:
Multicultural dimension of science and education. SPb: RGPU im. A. I. Gercena, 2021. Pp. 16–26. (In Rus.)
22. Alekseev, S. V. Reflections on the “education for sustainable development through culture” model.
Ecopoiesis: eco-humanitarian theory and practice, no. 1, 2021. Web. 20.11.2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/
article/n/razmyshleniya-o-modeli-obrazovanie-v-interesah-ustoychivogo-razvitiya-cherez-kulturu. (In Rus.)
23. Dzyatkovskaya, E. N., Dlimbetova, G. K., Majmakova, M. S., Zhumazhanova, K. I. Modeling
regenerative educational spaces. Modern teacher education, no. 2, 2022. Web. 20.11.2023. https://
cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modelirovanie-regenerativnyh-obrazovatelnyh-prostranstv. (In Rus.) |
