| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
“Study the Old, but Create the New”: about Trends and Tendencies in the History of Domestic Methods of Studying Literature |
| Authors |
Romanicheva E.S. Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Romanicheva@mgpu.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
Romanicheva E. S. “Study the Old, but Create the New”: about Trends and Tendencies in the History of Domestic Methods of Studying Literature // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. 2025. Vol. 20, no. 3. Р. 34–43. DOI: 10.21209/2658-7114-2025-20-3-34-43 |
| Section |
Modern Pedagogy: Trends, Technologies and Innovations |
| UDK |
372.882 |
| DOI |
10.21209/2658-7114-2025-20-3-34-43 |
| Article type |
Original article |
| Annotation |
The article is written on the basis of the analysis of a large array of factual material, which allowed the author to identify trends and tendencies in the development of the history of literature teaching methods. This determined the relevance, novelty of the conducted desk study and its purpose – to substantiate the need to overcome the negative trend in understanding the methodological heritage of the twentieth century, as well as to identify possible ways to overcome this. The main research methods are content analysis of sources, in-depth interviews. The article shows how the negative trend in the assessment of the methodological heritage was overcome. The author primarily attributed the expansion of the context (updating the names of methodologists and their scientific works in the professional field) to significant factors, which entailed a significant update of the content of manuals and anthologies on the history of the methodology, and also the creation of the “Bio-bibliographical Dictionary” on the methodology of teaching literature. The publication of these books largely has determined the trend of development of science at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries. The second significant factor has become the change in the approach to understanding a specific methodological system. The author believes that the starting point for the development of not only the history of literature teaching methods, but also methodological science as a whole, today can be the historical-bibliographic approach, within the framework of which a methodological bibliography is created, and shows what has been done in this direction, and what remains to be done. The author claims that attention to the creation of a bibliography arises in the case of the republication of the scientist’s works or his anniversary. This is a constantly emerging trend in methodology. In the publications of anniversary articles, the author distinguishes two directions: analytical and “recollective” and designates the conditions (setting a scientific task and using the biographical method), under which the “recollective” trend can be transformed.
|
| Key words |
history of methodology, trend, tendency, historical and bibliographic approach, methodological bibliography, biographical method |
| Article information |
|
| References |
Chertov VF, Antipova AM, Zinin SA, Erokhina EL, Podrugina IA, Getmanskaya EV (et al). Scientific school of V.V. Golubkov: reading and methods of teaching literature in the information age: monograph. Moscow: Mosk. ped. gos. un-t; 2023. 190 p. DOI: 10.31862/9785426313248 EDN: EHQOBV (In Russian).
Chertov VF, Erokhina EL, Getmanskaya EV. Strategies for developing a teacher’s soft skills: problems and prospects of research. Science and School. 2023;(6):126–137. DOI: 10.31862/1819-463X-2023-6-126-137 EDN: CBLQUP (In Russian).
Getmanskaya EV. The European didactic model: studying of a literary text and general competence. Education of children and youth in modern socio-cultural conditions: problems, challenges, solutions: conference materials. Smolensk: 2025. P. 173–179. EDN: MQPPLD (In Russian).
Chertov VF. Russian literature in pre-revolutionary school. Moscow: MPGU im. VI. Lenina; 1994. 130 p. EDN: ZFPXWJ (In Russian).
Chertov VF, Antipovа AM (eds). Pedagogy of reading in the digital age: monograph. Moscow: Mosk. ped. gos. un-t; 2024. 226 p. DOI: 10.31862/9785426314450 EDN: IPETPW (In Russian).
Rotkovich YaA. Essays on the history of teaching literature in Russian schools. Moscow: Izd-vo Akad. ped. nauk RSFSR; 1953. 352 p. (In Russian).
Bochkarev AA, Bodrova NA, Sigal LM. Yakov Aronovich Rotkovich. In: Bodrova NA (ed). Teaching Literature at School. Scientific Works. Kuibyshev; 1975. Vol. 171. P. 3–12. (In Russian).
Kudryashev NI. Rybnikova as a methodologist. Literature at School. 1947;(3):27–38. (In Russian).
Rotkovich YaA. About the methodological system of MA. Rybnikova. Literatura i yazyk v politekhnicheskoi shkole. 1932;(1):29–38. (In Russian).
Lanin BA. Literary education in the 19th – Early 21st century: monograph. Moscow: VGNA; 2005. 172 p. EDN: QRGXUH (In Russian).
Ben’kovskaya TYa. Scientific directions and schools in Russian methods of teaching literature of the 18th – early 21st centuries: monograph. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka; 2015. 360 p. (In Russian).
Sokolov NM. Study of literary works. Moscow; Leningrad: Gos. izd-vo; 1928. 160 p. (In Russian).
Chirkovskaya TV, Stanchek NA. Methods of teaching literature department at the AI. Herzen Leningrad State Pedagogical institute: history (1920–1989). Saint Petersburg: Asterion; 2007. 35 p. EDN: QTJSVB (In Russian).
Perzeke AB. Intellectual consumerism. On the bibliographic literacy of future language teachers. Sovetskaya bibliografiya. 1989;(6):9–13. (In Russian).
Al’batyrova VN. Development of teaching literature methods in the 1950s–1970s: historical and bibliographic aspect: cand. sci. diss. Saint-Petersburg; 1991. 254 p. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/razvitie-metodiki-prepodavaniya-literatury-v-1950-1970-e-gody-istoriko-bibliograficheskii-as (accessed 02.04.2025). EDN: NPQKRN (In Russian).
Ben’kovskaya TE. Development of the teaching literature methodology from 1900 to 1949: historical and bibliographic aspect: cand. sci. diss. Saint-Petersburg; 1994. 700 p. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/razvitie-metodiki-prepodavaniya-literatury-s-1900-po-1949-gg-ist-bibliogr-aspekt (accessed 02.05.2025). EDN: NLINXL (In Russian).
Terent’eva NP. (ed). Open methodology of VG. Marantsman: monograph. Moscow: Prospekt; 2025. 288 p. (In Russian).
Romanicheva ES. “While biographies have not yet acquired the significance which they will undoubtedly have in science...” (NA Rybnikov). Literature at school. 2025;(1):105–117. DOI: 10.31862/0130-3414-2025-1-105-117 EDN: QBOCOX (In Russian).
Romanicheva ES. “The history of methodology teaches us to more accurately and dismemberedly define our goals and methods in the present” (on the 140th anniversary of the birth of MA. Rybnikovoi). In: Literary education in the context of digital transformation: development of the creative potential of the individual. XXXIII Golubkov readings. Moscow: MPGU; 2025. P. 38–39. (In Russian).
|
| Full article | “Study the Old, but Create the New”: about Trends and Tendencies in the History of Domestic Methods of Studying Literature |
