| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
Technologies of Axiological Studies of Folklore at a Secondary School |
| Authors |
Yakovleva O.N.postgraduate atomanovka@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
|
| Section |
|
| DOI |
|
| UDK |
37.0 |
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
The article presents the technology of the axiological comprehension of folklore as a result
of the experiment carried out at a secondary school. The main stages of the technology are
described in the article. The pedagogical methods and techniques used to stimulate the axiological
comprehension of the folklore text are analyzed in the article as well.
Valuable and semantic (axiological) fundamentals of folk-lore texts are mostly revealed
with semiotic analysis, consisting of interdetermined and interconnected semantic units: «an
axiological statement (constant)» – «the concept of the genre» – «an axiological concept»–
«the plot motif» – «the symbolic image». The semiotic analysis which had been approved
repeatedly by the literary criticism connects two semantic planes: the plane of the content and
that of the expression which helps to reconstruct our ancestors’ mythological picture of the
world.
Using the semiotic method to analyze folk-lore texts enables us to penetrate into the
closed sphere of mentality, into the values system of a people or an ethnos, and lets us make
the dominant values existing in a people’s mentality explicit using the regional folklore material.
The author believes the usage of technologies of axiological studies of folklore will solve the
main problem of literary education – the development of axiological competence of contemporary
schoolchildren.
|
| Key words |
folk-lore genres, technologies of axiological studies of folklore, literary education,
pedagogical methods and techniques. |
| Article information |
|
| References |
1. Afanas’ev A. N. Mifologija Drevnej Rusi. M.: JeKSMO, 2007. S. 201.
2. Bahtin M. M. Avtor i geroj: k filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnyh nauk. SPb.: Azbuka,
2000. S. 91.
3. Bahtin M. M. Voprosy literatury i jestetiki. M.: Hudozhestvennaja literatura, 1975.
S. 89.
4. Kolesov V. V. Zhizn’ proishodit ot slova. M.: Hudozhestvennaja literatura, 1999.
S. 45.
5. Litvinov V. V. Sochinenija v starshih klassah kak samostojatel’naja rabota. M.: Uchpedgiz,
1957. S. 89.
6. Lotman Ju. M. Vnutri mysljawih mirov. Chelovek – Tekst – Semiosfera – Istorija. M.:
Prosvewenie, 1999. S. 123.
7. Marancman V. G. Spisok literatury 10 kl.: v 2 ch. M.: Prosvewenie, 2001. S. 156.
8. Metodika prepodavanija literatury / pod red. O.Ju.Bogdanovoj i V. G. Marancmana: v
2 ch. M.: Prosvewenie; Vlados, 1995. S. 234.
9. Mify narodov mira. Jenciklopedija: v 2 t. M., 2000. S. 345.
10. Narodnaja kul’tura v sovremennyh uslovijah: ucheb. posobie / Ministerstvo kul’tury
RF. M.: Logos. S. 234.
11. Nikitina S. E. Ustnaja narodnaja kul’tura i jazykovoe soznanie. M., 1993. S. 145.
12. Proekt federal’nogo komponenta gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta obwego
obrazovanija. Ch 2. Starshaja shkola / pod red. Je. D. Dneprova i V. D. Shadrikova.
Vremennyj nauchnyj kollektiv «Obrazovatel’nyj standart» Ministerstva obrazovanija RF. M.,
2004.
13. Rybnikova M. A. Ocherki po metodike literaturnogo chtenija. 3-e izd., M., 1963.
S. 78. |
| Full article | Technologies of Axiological Studies of Folklore at a Secondary School |
