| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
Scientists and Journalists: in Search of Mutual Understanding |
| Authors |
Medvedeva S. .Candidate of Political Science, Associate Professor svetamedvedeva@mail.ruLitvak N.V.Candidate of Sociology, Associate Professor jourfr@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
Medvedeva S. M., Litvak N. V. Scientists and Journalists: in Search of Mutual Understanding // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. Series Philosophy. Cultural Studies. Sociology. Social Work. 2016. Vol. 11, No. 2. PP. 15–25. DOI: 10.21209/2308–877Х-2016-11-3-15-25. |
| Section |
|
| DOI |
10.21209/2308–877Х-2016-11-3-15-25 |
| UDK |
00:070 |
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
The article discusses problems and perspectives of popularization of science in contemporary Russia and more precisely, the communication between Russian scientists and mass media. The article is based on qualitative research (method of unstructured interviews) conducted among scientists and journalists. The research aims to reveal the existing practices of interaction between scientists and journalists (how these practices are conceived by the actors), their understanding of goals, forms and probable obstacles of science communication, assess the subjective readiness of both sides for collaboration. The main results are the following: despite the recent tendency to establish new and to support existing popular scientific resources (magazines, TV programs, the Internet resources, etc.) communication among scientists and journalists suffers from some difficulties, which have socio-psychological roots. Scientists and journalists are biased against each other and are characterized by the lack of motivation for cooperation, they don’t understand goals and interests of each other. Leading Russian scientific centers don’t have elaborated programs to promote science to society. These obstacles have negative impact on popular scientific production.
|
| Key words |
science, journalism, popularization of science, science communication, qualitative methods, social psychology |
| Article information |
|
| References |
1. Glagolev V. S. Realizm analiza – ishodnoe uslovie nauchnoj perspektivnosti // Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. 2011. № 4. S. 12–18.
2. Litvak N. V. Informacionnoe obshhestvo: permanentnaja jevoljucija. M.: Kolos, 2008. 418 s.
3. Litvak N. V. K itogam HIH Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa frankojazychnyh sociologov: novye podhody k izucheniju neopredeljonnosti // Vestn. MGIMO-Universiteta. 2013. № 1. S.188–191.
4. Litvak N. V. Um i bogatstvo: edinstvo ili konflikt? // Konfliktologija. 2014. № 4. S.129–149.
5. Medvedeva S. M. Vlijanie social’noj pamjati rossijan na ih predstavlenija ob ideal’noj vlasti // Logos. 2003. № 4. S. 186–194.
6. Medvedeva S. M. Vozdejstvie stereotipov na massovoe soznanie: opyt Rossii, 90-e gg.: dis. … kand. polit. nauk: 23.00.02. M., 2000. 181 c.
7. Medvedeva S. M. Nauchnaja kommunikacija v sovremennom mire: problemy i perspektivy // Vestn. MGIMO-Universiteta. 2014. № 2. S. 253–255.
8. Medvedeva S. M. Ot nauchnogo tvorchestva k populjarizacii nauki: teoreticheskaja model’ nauchnoj kommunikacii // Vestn. MGIMO-Universiteta. 2014. № 4. S. 278–286.
9. Medvedeva S. M. Politicheskaja filosofija v sovremennoj Rossii // Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija. 2007. № 6. S. 157–164.
10. Pichugina T. Uchjonye i zhurnalisty pomerilis’ silami-2 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.strf.ru/material.aspx?CatalogId=221&d_no=30306#.VZ_w6NQ52Qs (data obrashhenija: 16.03.2016).
11. Romanova M. D. Istorija populjarizacii nauki vo Francii // Vestn. MGIMO-Universiteta. 2015. № 2. S. 276–282.
12. Silant’eva M. V. Jetika v plenu abstrakcij, ili O paradokse nauchnosti professional’noj jetiki // Vestn. MGIMO-Universiteta. 2015. № 3. S. 280–281.
13. Danwoody S., Bucchi M., Trench B. Science Journalism. Handbook of public commu-nication of science and technology. London; New York: Routledge, 2008.
14. Flick U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research // Pine Forge Press. 2006. 375 p. |
| Full article | Scientists and Journalists: in Search of Mutual Understanding |
