| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
Religious Conflict as Non-Religious: Form, Content, Structure |
| Authors |
Ryazanova S.V.Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher svet-ryazanova@yandex.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
Ryazanova S. V. Religious Conflict as Non-Religious: Form, Content, Structure // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. Series Philosophy. Cultural Studies. Sociology. Social Work. 2016. Vol. 11, No. 2. PP. 26–32. DOI: 10.21209/2308–877Х-2016-11-3-26-32. |
| Section |
|
| DOI |
10.21209/2308–877Х-2016-11-3-26-32 |
| UDK |
2-76 |
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
In this article the question about essential features of a religious conflict – one of the most significant phenomena revealing the role of religion in modern culture – is considered. The author tries to define the main components of such a conflict and to detect among them specially those which are of exclusively religious origin. This attempt could give us a chance to classify the phenomenon under consideration and to treat it as wholly special. The author proposes to describe religious conflicts as collisions resulting from diversity of participants’ outlook and connected with their claims of resources, influence and status. The religious components of these collisions are characterized according to the principle of facet classification, and conflicts are divided into intrapersonal, personal, interpersonal, group and intergroup ones. The author also analyzes the main social elements of religion – the doctrine, cult practice and daily religious activity – as a potential source for a conflict and determines which of them are incapable to produce religious conflicts. It is stressed that this conflict has never existed in its pure form, but it is used to legitimate external actions from the other spheres of social life. The religious component seems to be represented only by participants of these conflicts pursuing not actually religious aims. The religious outlook can hardly transform conflict’s social nature and create its special version.
|
| Key words |
world outlook, religion, religious conflict, classification of conflicts, ideal model, components of conflict |
| Article information |
|
| References |
1. Blaug M. Boulding Kennet Evart // 100 velikikh ekonomistov posle Keinsa. SPb.: Ekonomikus, 2009.
2. Kozer L. Funktsii sotsial’nogo konflikta [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.philsci.univ.kiev.ua/biblio/kozer.html (data obrashcheniya: 26.01.2016).
3. Kokh I. A. Konflikty i ikh regulirovanie. Ekaterinburg, 1997. 48 s.
4. Lebedeva M. M. Politicheskoe uregulirovanie konfliktov: podkhody, resheniya, tekhnologii. Klassifikatsiya konfliktov [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.society.polbu.ru/lebedeva_settlement/ch06_ii.html (data obrashcheniya: 26.01.2016).
5. Metody uregulirovaniya konfliktov // Psikhologiya onlain [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.psychological.ru/default.aspx?s (data obrashcheniya: 26.01.2016).
6. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya lichnosti [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://lekcion.ru/Socialnaja_psihologija_lichnosti/6325-voprosi-dlya obsuzhdeniya.html (data obrashcheniya: 26.01.2016).
7. Terner Dzh. Struktura sotsiologicheskoi teorii. M.: Progress, 1985. 472 s.
8. Shash N. Konfliktologiya. Shpargalka [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.litres.ru/natalya-shash/konfliktologiya-shpargalka (data obrashcheniya: 26.01.2016).
9. Shevchuk D. Konflikty: izbegat’ ili forsirovat’ [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.center-nlp.ru/library/s55/s62/shevchuk.html?current_book_page=4 (data obrashcheniya: 26.01.2016).
10. Bisno H. Managing conflict. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publ., 1988. 175 p.
11. Fox J. Religion and State Failure: An Examination of the Extent and Magnitude of Religious Conflict from 1950 to 1996 // International Political Science Review. 2004. Vol. 25, No. 1.
12. Nielsen M. E., Fultz J. Further Examination of the Relationships of Religious Orientation to Religious Conflict // Review of Religious Research. 1995. Vol. 36, No. 4. |
| Full article | Religious Conflict as Non-Religious: Form, Content, Structure |
