References |
1. Branitskaya, L. L. Branitskaya, G. A. PISA – pros and cons. The analysis of results of the russian school students on the international tests. Continuum. Maths. Computer science. Education, no. 4, pp. 73–79, 2017. (In Rus.)
2. Deryabina, V. V. Modern approach to monitoring quality assessment of mathematics education, Continuum. Maths. Computer science. Education, no. 4, pp. 61–70, 2016. (In Rus.)
3. Yefremova-Shershukova, N. A., Mineyev-Li, V. E., Kollegov, A. K., Sultanova, V. I. International PISA study as one of the effective means of assessing the quality of education at school. Pedagogical issues, no. 12–1, pp. 83–86, 2019. (In Rus.)
4. Lukicheva, E. Yu. Mathematical literacy of schoolchildren: in the footsteps of international studies. Education: development resources. LOIRO Bulletin, no. 2, pp. 64–72, 2020. (In Rus.)
5. Bolotov, V. A., Sedova, E. A., Kovaleva, G. S. The state of mathematics education in the Russian Federation: general secondary education. Problems of modern education, no. 6, pp. 32–47, 2012. (In Rus.)
6. Petrakovich, Е. V. Mathematical literacy as a condition for the development of society. Advances in modern natural science, no. 1, pp. 64–65, 2008. (In Rus.)
7. Roslova, L. O., Kvitko, E. S., Denischeva, L. O., Karamova, I. I. The problem of forming the ability to “apply mathematics” in the context of levels of mathematical literacy. Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy, no. 2, pp. 74–99, 2020. (In Rus.)
8. Rizki, L. M., Priatna, N. Mathematical literacy as the 21st century skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1157, is.4, 042088, 2019 . DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088. (In Engl.)
9. Denischeva, L. O., Savintseva, N. V., Safuanov, I. S., Ushakov, A. V., Chugunov, V. А., Seme-
nyachenko, Yu. А. Peculiarities of formation and assessment of schoolchildren’s mathematical literacy. Science for Education Today, no. 11, pp. 113–135, 2021. DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2104.06. (In Engl.)
10. Kaskataeva, B. R., Кokazhaev, A. B., Kazbеk, Zh. Mathematical modeling as a tool for increasing the mathematical literacy of students. Bulletin of Kazakh National Women’s Teacher Training University, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2021. DOI: 10.52512/2306-5079-2021-85-1-58-66. (In Kazakh)
11. Margolina, N. L., Nalimova, I. V. Mathematical literacy as an important component of preparing a future teacher. Bulletin of the Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, no.27, pp. 149–153, 2021. DOI: 10.34216/2073-1426-2021-27-2-149-153. (In Rus.)
12. Roslova, L. О., Karamova, I. I. On the readiness of teachers to form functional mathematical literacy of schoolchildren. Profession-oriented School, no. 8, pp. 14–26, 2020. DOI: 10.12737/1998-0744-2020-14-26. (In Rus.)
13. Murtafiah, W., Lukitasari, M., Lestari, N. D. S. Exploring the Decision-Making Process of Pre-Service Teachers in Solving Mathematics Literacy Problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 145–160, 2012. DOI: 10.22342/jpm.15.2.13908.145-160. (In Engl.)
14. Tambunan, H. Analysis of Mathematics Teacher Performance in Building Resilience and Mathema-
tical Literacy on Student Learning Outcomes. Universal Journal of Educational Research, no. 9, pp. 108–115, 2021. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2021.090112. (In Engl.)
15. Bolstad, O. H. Secondary Teachers’ Operationalization of Mathematical Literacy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 8, pp. 115–135, 2020. DOI: 10.30935/scimath/9551. (In Engl.) 16. Erbas, A. K., Genc, M. Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptions of the Barriers to the Development of Mathematical Literacy. International Journal on Teaching and Learning Mathematics, no. 21, pp. 143–173, 2020. (In Engl.)
17. Genc, M., Erbas, A. K. Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptions of Mathematical Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, no.7, pp.222–237, 2019. (In Engl.)
18. Umbara, U., Suryadi, D. Re-interpretation of Mathematical Literacy Based on the Teacher’s Perspective. International Journal of Instruction, vol. 12, pp. 789–806, 2019. DOI: 10.29333/iji.2019.12450a. (In Engl.)
19. Lukicheva, E. Yu. Mathematical literacy: An overview of the concept and methodology of formation. Lifelong Education, no. 3, pp. 46–53, 2020. (In Rus.)
20. Sanina, Е. I., Nasikan, I. V. Meta-subject level of content in education as a development factor of mathematical competence. Problems of modern teacher education, no. 60–4, pp. 371–374, 2018. (In Rus.)
21. Afifah, A., Khoiri, M., Qomaria, N. Mathematics Preservice Teachers’ Views on Mathematical Literacy. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, vol. 1, pp. 92–94, 2019. DOI: 10.33122/ijtmer.v1i3.45. (In Engl.)
22. Jailani, J., Retnawati, H., Wulandari, N. F., Djidu, H. Mathematical Literacy Proficiency Development Based on Content, Context, and Process. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, no. 78, pp. 80–101, 2020. DOI: 10.33225/pec/20.78.80. (In Engl.)
23. Interdisciplinary integration in education. Chita: ZabSU, 2018. (In Rus.)
24. Miroshin, A. V., Konysheva, T. V. Mathematical literacy as the main factor in the formation of a financially literate schoolchild in the context of innovative education. Priority directions of development of science and education, no. 3, pp. 327–329, 2015. (In Rus.)
25. Ozkale, A., Erdogan, E. O. An Analysis of the Interaction between Mathematical Literacy and Financial Literacy in PISA. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 51, pp. 1–21, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1842526. (In Engl.) |