| References |
1. Khlebnikova, N. A. Okonnikova, T. I. Batalova, L. V. Analysis and assessment by the pedagogical community of universities of the experience of distance learning in a pandemic. Bulletin of the Udmurt University, no. 1, pp. 83–93, 2021. (In Rus.)
2. Paskova, A. A. Mobile learning in higher education: BYOD technologies. Bulletin of the Maikop State Technological University, no. 4, pp. 98–105, 2018. (In Rus.)
3. Wainwright, A. Pros and Cons of BYOD and 1-to-1 Technology in the Classroom, Securedge networks. Web. 15.06.2022 : https://www.securedgenetworks.com/blog/Pros-and-Cons-of-BYOD-and-1-to-1-Technology-inthe-Classroom (In Engl.)
4. Gillies, C. To BYOD or not to BYOD: factors affecting academic acceptance of student mobile devices in the classroom, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 24, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.30357
(In Engl.)
5. Pao-Nan Chou, Chi-Cheng Chang, Ching-Hsin Lin. BYOD or not: A comparison of two assessment strategies for student learning, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 74, pp. 63–71, 2017. (In Engl.)
6. Yanjie, Song, Siu Cheung Kong. Affordances and constraints of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) for learning and teaching in higher education: Teachers’ perspectives, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 32, pp. 39–46, 2017. (In Engl.)
7. Lyubanets, I. I. The use of BYOD technology in the educational process. Bulletin of the Donetsk Pedagogical Institute, no. 3, pp. 82–88, 2017. (In Rus.)
8. Gubanova, A. Yu. Media content for children as an element of the educational process. Media education, no. 2, pp. 152–169, 2017. (In Rus.)
9. Barkovsky, D. A. Educational content as a new segment of network media. Bulletin of the Volga University named after V.N. Tatischev, no. 2, pp. 61–68, 2021. (In Rus.)
10. Skorova, L. V. The problem of the teacher’s choice of educational media resources and the Internet: a psychological aspect. Scholarly Notes of the Transbaikal State University, no. 5, pp. 153–159, 2019.
(In Rus.)
11. Poshtareva, T. V., Gribova, E. P. The structure of the cognitive activity of an individual. Modern problems of science and education, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2020. (In Rus.)
12. Melekhina, S. I. Means of development of cognitive activity of students in the process of teaching technology. Technological education and sustainable development of the region, no. 1–1, pp. 57–63, 2020. (In Rus.)
13. Osipova, S. I., Agisheva, N. S. Cognitive activity as an object of pedagogical analysis. Humanization of Education, no. 2, pp. 89–96, 2016. (In Rus.)
14. Chernyshev, I. A., Tsukanov, M. V. The problem of development of cognitive activity of adolescents in the educational process. Scholarly Notes Electronic Scientific Journal of the Kursk State University, no. 3, pp. 147–150, 2021. (In Rus.)
15. Luchnikova, E. V. Formation of cognitive activity of students in the modern lesson. Bulletin of the Perm State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University, no. 2, pp. 57–62, 2018. (In Rus.)
16. Magomadova, Z. S. Influence of digital content on cognitive activity. Innovative mechanisms for solving problems of scientific development, no. 1, pp. 57-60, 2019. (In Rus.)
17. Gatulin, R. R. Kolupaeva, D. A. Using the Telegram messenger to implement e-learning technology at a university. St. Petersburg Educational Bulletin, no. 11–12, pp. 31–33, 2017. (In Rus.)
18. Nenakhova, E. V. Diagnostics of cognitive interest in students of senior classes of secondary general education school. Science and School, no. 2, pp. 207–211, 2014. (In Rus.) |
