| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
Metadisciplinary Orientation as one of Mathematics Learning Process Key Features |
| Authors |
|
| Bibliographic description |
Naumova M. V. Metadisciplinary Orientation as one of Mathematics Learning Process Key Features // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. Series Pedagogical Sciences. 2017. Vol. 12, № 2. PP. 96–104. |
| Section |
METHODOLOGY OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION |
| UDK |
371.38 |
| DOI |
|
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
According to the Federal State Educational Standards requirements, modern mathematics learning process should correspond to metadisciplinary orientation. Such correspondence gives wide scope for the development of not only metadisciplinary, but personal and disciplinary learning outcomes in the context of mathematics integrity and its importance. Having analyzed the peculiarities of mathematics teaching process in the secondary school, we concluded that this discipline is fully oriented on developing of metadisciplinary competence as a form of metadisciplinary orientation concept implementation. The article data substantiates the structure and objectives of students’ lead-up to the development of their metadisciplinary competence, presents complex diagnostic programme to screen metadisciplinary learning outcomes dynamics in the process of studying mathematics in the 5–6 forms of comprehensive school. To depict the programme effectiveness, the results of experimental research work on metadisciplinary competence development on the example of motivational orientation index are presented. Research data indicate that secondary school students’ metadisciplinary competence development based on mathematics learning field allows us to guide the learning process to metadisciplinary orientation most effectively.
|
| Key words |
mathematics in secondary school, metadisciplinary rientation, mathematics training structure, learning process participant, diagnostic programme, motivational orientation |
| Article information |
|
| References |
1. Agayants I. M. Rol’ matematiki v nauchnykh issledovaniyakh // Istoriya i pedagogika estestvoznaniya. 2013. № 3. S. 15–19.
2. Badmaeva N. Ts. Vliyanie motivatsionnogo faktora na razvitie umstvennykh sposobnostei. Ulan-Ude:
Izd-vo VSGTU, 2004. S. 149–150.
3. Bozhenko V. V. Realizatsiya printsipa metapredmetnosti na uroke matematiki: sredstva, priemy, metody // Kontsept: nauch.-metod. elektron. zhurn. 2015. T. 6. S. 101–105.
4. Borovskikh A. V., Verevkina V. E. Predmetnye i metapredmetnye problemy shkol’nogo kursa matematiki. Tema «Neravenstva» // Nauka i shkola. 2015. № 5. S. 77–87.
5. Vlasova O. I. Rol’ kursa «Ispol’zovanie informatsionnoi sredy Scilab v shkol’noi matematike» pri podgotovke uchashchikhsya k EGE po matematike i formirovanii metapredmetnykh umenii starsheklassnikov // Munitsipal’noe obrazovanie: innovatsii i eksperiment. 2012. № 3. S. 33–35.
6. Gil’bukha Yu. Z. Test-oprosnik kommunikativnykh umenii dlya podrostkov i starsheklassnikov [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www/chernmmc.edusite.ru/DswMedia/gil-bux_oprosnikkom_umeniypodr.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.03.2017).
7. Dubogrei T. F., Selyuta S. S. Rol’ matematiki v effektivnom izuchenii informatiki // ISOM. 2016. Pril. № 1. S. 68–78.
8. Ershov A. P. O predmete informatiki // Izbrannye trudy. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1994. S. 30–40.
9. Karpov A. V. Refleksivnost’ kak psikhicheskoe svoistvo i metodika ee diagnostiki // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2003. T. 24, № 5. S. 45–57.
10. Krulekht M. V., Tel’nyuk I. V. Ekspertnye otsenki v obrazovanii. M.: Akademiya, 2002. 112 s.
11. Prokudina Yu. A. Vozmozhnosti realizatsii modeli formirovaniya u uchashchikhsya metapredmetnykh znanii v klassakh fiziko-matematicheskogo profilya // Vestnik ChGPU. 2012. № 7. S. 146–156.
12. Sinyavskii V. V., Fedoroshin V. A. Metodika «Kommunikativnye i organizatorskie sposobnosti» [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.testoteka.narod.ru/lichn/1/17.html (data obrashcheniya: 15.03.2017).
13. Solov’eva M. S. Formirovanie universal’nykh uchebnykh deistvii v obrazovatel’noi oblasti «Matematika i informatika» // Vestnik KGPU im. V. P. Astaf’eva. 2014. № 2. S. 193–198.
14. Stefanova N. L. Sovremennaya metodika obucheniya matematike i metodicheskaya podgotovka uchitelya // Vestnik NovGU. 2012. № 70. S. 52–55.
15. Khutorskoi A. V. Klyuchevye kompetentsii i obrazovatel’nye standarty // Eidos. 2002. 23 apr. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.eidos.ru/journal/2002/0423.htm (data obrashcheniya: 15.03.2017).
16. Yasyukova L. A. Prognoz i profilaktika problem obucheniya v 3–6 klassakh. SPb.: IMATON, 2010 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.imaton.com/metodiki/met/38/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.02.2017).
17. Wajeeh D. Cognitive, Meta-Cognitive, Affective, Social and Behavioral Aspects of Mobile Mathematics Learning // The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology. 2013. No. 7. PP. 364–381. |
| Full article | Metadisciplinary Orientation as one of Mathematics Learning Process Key Features |
