| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
Paronyms Functioning in the Scientific Speech as an Action of the Shaping Mechanism |
| Authors |
Golovanova E.l. Doctor of Philosophical, Professor ligol@csu.ruDemidova E.N.Candidate of Philology demidova_74@list.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
|
| Section |
|
| DOI |
|
| UDK |
81’373.613 |
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
Article is devoted to the phenomenon of paronymy in the contemporary scientific texts.
The authors proposed the cognitive approach to the examination of this problem – through
the analysis of the shaping mechanism, which lies at the base of the differentiation of
words similar according to the structure, but different in semantics. It is asserted that after
the lexical units, which incomplete paronyms are, stand a certain general conceptual
content, which differently is shaped with the aid of the lingual units. Based on the example
of the analysis of a number of paronym’s oppositions the authors show the possibility of
the differentiation of terminological and other paronyms, which function is in the scientific speech. The attention is paid to the fact that paronyms in the sphere of scientific communication predominantly form the privative oppositions, one of members of which (marked) is characterized by the presence of the specific differential sign, and another (not marked) by its absence. Special carefulness should be observed with the use of terms-paronyms, since the scientific term, being the element of the logical model of knowledge field, is approached such relationship of the lingual form and content, with which a change in the form of designation regularly entails a change in the conceptual content confronting after it, and vice versa.
|
| Key words |
scientific text, paronym, term, shaping, paronym opposition, marking. |
| Article information |
|
| References |
1. Boldyrev N. N. Znachenie i smysl s kognitivnoi tochki zreniya i problema mnogo-znachnosti // Kognitivnaya semantika: materialy II Mezhdunar. shkoly-seminara po kognitivnoi lingvistike: v 2 ch. Ch. 1. Tambov: Izd-vo Tamb. un-ta, 2000. S. 11–17.
2. Vorkachev S. G. . Iz istorii slov: lingvokul’turnyi kontsept // Novoe v kognitivnoi lingvistike. Kemerovo: Izd-vo KemGU, 2006. S. 3–14.
3. Golovanova E. I. Paronimiya v nauchnom tekste kak problema sootnosheniya yazykovoi formy i soderzhaniya // Gumanitarnyi vektor. 2012. № 4 (32). S. 28–33.
4. Demidova E. N. Paronimiya v nauchnom tekste: kognitivnyi aspekt: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.19. Chelyabinsk, 2014. 22 s.
5. Demidova E. N. Kognitivnyi podkhod k analizu paronimicheskikh zamen v nauchnoi rechi // Vestn. Chelyab. gos. un-ta. Ser. «Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie». 2013. № 37 (328). Vyp. 86. S. 29–31.
6. Dyagileva I. B. «Ideologiya gomeopatii»: k istorii odnogo ponyatiya v russkom yazyke XIX veka // Evolyutsiya ponyatii v svete istorii russkoi kul’tury / otv. red. V. M. Zhivov, Yu. V. Kagarlitskii. M., 2012. S. 297–305.
7. Zabelina N. A. Mentalitet i mental’nost’ // Teoriya yazyka i mezhkul’turnaya kommu-nikatsiya: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. Kursk: Izd-vo Kur. gos. un-ta, 2003. S. 21–28.
8. Kolesov V. V. Russkaya mental’nost’ v yazyke i tekste. SPb.: Peterb. Vostokovedenie, 2006. 624 s.
9. Leichik V. M. Terminovedenie: predmet, metody, struktura. M.: KomKniga, 2006. 256 s.
10. Leneker R. V. Kontseptual’naya semantika i simvolicheskaya grammatika // Vopr. kogni-tivnoi lingvistiki. № 3. 2006. S. 15–28. |
| Full article | Paronyms Functioning in the Scientific Speech as an Action of the Shaping Mechanism |
