| Annotation |
The article introduces the concept of the innovative educational system “School of Dialogue”, developed
by scientists and teachers of the A. I. Herzen RSPU. The system is focused on the formation of a holistic personality,
which is achieved through a system-activity approach to the construction of the educational process
in all academic disciplines, in the organization of interdisciplinary interaction and allows you to harmoniously
combine special (speech, mathematical, literary, technological, musical, etc.) and overall development of
students. Training, development and education are organized as a single process, which contributes to the
transformation of the information received by schoolchildren into personally significant knowledge. Special
attention in the article is paid to the principles of dialogization of learning, on which the learning kit “School of
Dialogue” is built. Various interpretations of the concept of “educational dialogue” are considered. Key ideas
for organizing a dialogue of participants in the educational process are presented. A general description of
various types of dialogue and examples of their implementation in the textbooks “School of Dialogue” are
given. The contents of the dialogues “Student ‒ teacher”, “Student ‒ student”, “Student ‒ parents”, “Teacher
‒ parents”, “Student ‒ educational environment”, a dialogue with a textbook, a dialogue with oneself are
disclosed. All types of dialogue make it possible to establish connections between educational materials of
different subject areas, to see phenomena from different positions, to recognize the possibility of different
points of view on solving one problem, to listen and hear the interlocutor, to possess universal educational
actions that will help students to live with dignity in today’s rapidly changing multicultural world. Examples illustrating different types of dialogue in different textbooks of the learning kit are given – music, technology,
literary reading, Russian language, etc. |
| References |
1. Vygotsky, L. S. Problems of age. Collected works: In 6 vol. M: Pedagogika, 1982–1984. Vol. 4.
Рр. 244–268. (In Rus.)
2. Zankov, L. V. Selected pedagogical works. APN SSSR. M: Pedagogika, 1990. (In Rus.)
3. Skatkin, M. N. Problems of modern didactics. M: Pedagogika, 1980. (In Rus.)
4. Serikov, V. V. Personality-oriented learning: Myths and reality. Pedagogika, no. 10, pp. 4–12, 2007.
(In Rus.)
5. Yakimanskaya, I. S. Development of personality-oriented learning technology. Questions of
psychology, no. 2, pp. 31‒41, 1995. (In Rus.)
6. Feldshteyn, D. I. The World of Childhood in the modern world (problems and research tasks). M:
MPSU, 2013. (In Rus.)
7. Kagan, M. S. System-synergetic approach to the construction of modern pedagogical theory.
Pedagogy of culture, no. 3, pp. 12–21, 2005. (In Rus.)
8. Abramkina, O. G. Educational dialogue as a means of forming the communicative culture of students.
Cand. sci. diss. Orel, 2003. (In Rus.)
9. Kornyushhenko, D. I. Integral dialogics: an attempt at a new technology of humanitarian education.
M: Izd-vo MPSI, 2003. (In Rus.)
10. Korol, A. D. Dialogue approach to the organization of heuristic training. Pedagogika, no. 9, pp. 18–
24, 2007. (In Rus.)
11. Vinogradova, N. F. Educational dialogue is an effective method for the development of younger
schoolchildren. Elementary education, no. 1, pp. 49–51, 2010. (In Rus.)
12. Sokolova, E. N. Development of logical thinking in art lessons. Problems of modern teacher
education, vol. 62, pp. 220–223, 2019. (In Rus.)
13. Afanasieva, A. B. Music lessons in the learning kit «Dialogue»: design and organization features.
Contemporary Music Education Proceedings of the XIII 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference.
SPb., 2014. Pp. 361–363. (In Rus.)
14. Venediktov, I. N. Physical culture in the educational space of primary school. Primary School, no. 2,
pp. 73–77, 2015. (In Rus.)
15. Titova, I. M. Development of the organizational and activity component of the metamethodological
school model. Humanization of the educational environment of a changing school (by means of integration
of subject teaching methods): Collection of scientific articles. SPb: Izd-vo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2005.
Pp. 8–24. (In Rus.)
16. Valitszkaya, A.P Metamethodological approach: conflict of interpretations. Metamethodics as a
promising direction for the development of private methods. Proceedings of the 2nd All-Russian Scientific and
Practical Conference. SPb: 2005. Pp. 3–8. (In Rus.)
17. Voyushina, M. P. The cultural field of a younger student as an object of mathematical research.
Metamethodics as a promising direction for the development of private methods. Proceedings of the 2nd All-
Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. SPb: Sudarynya, 2005. Pp. 9–13. (In Rus.)
18. Bordovsky, G. A., Voyushina, M. P., Suvorova, E. P. Suprasubject grounds for building an educational
and methodological kit for a multicultural primary school. Bulletin of the Herzen University, no. 11, pp. 21–26,
2011. (In Rus.)
19. The relationship between regular and extracurricular educational activities. Interdisciplinary projects
in primary school; pod red. M. P. Voyushinoj. SPb: Asterion, 2013. (In Rus.)
20. Kupirova, E. A., Suvorova, E. P. The development of a younger student as a subject of cognitive
activity. Primary School, no. 7, pp. 84–91, 2011. (In Rus.)
21. Misyukevich, A. N. Features of the author’s course «Technology» for multicultural primary schools
(within the framework of the project «Dialogue»). Herzen readings. Primary education. Volume 3. Issue 1.
Primary education: compliance with the standard. SPb: BBM, 2012. Pр. 45–50. (In Rus.)
22. Misyukevich, A. N. Technological education of primary school students: experience and prospects.
Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University, no. 2, pp. 86–93, 2020. (In Rus.) |
