| Annotation |
The system-activity approach as a methodological basis of modern general education updates schoolchildren’s
learning in activity. Methods of teaching Russian native language describe special features of forming
knowledge, abilities, skills and competences in educational, cognitive, speech and problem-solving, textual
and other types of activity. At the same time, culture-oriented linguistic methodology has not sufficiently
studied the potential for teaching intellectual activities to schoolchildren. The study aims at identification of this
potential. The author has suggested a hypothesis according to which intellectual activity of schoolchildren is
cognitive, research and creative, aimed at the development of students’ intelligence. It is also assumed that
in culture- oriented teaching of Russian it is possible to teach schoolchildren intellectual activity through the
enrichment of their mental experience, development of intellectual abilities, and formation of cognitive style.
The methodological basis of the study is the system-activity approach to teaching and the ontological theory
of intelligence by M. A. Kholodnaya. Based on the analysis of scientific literature on the topic of the study,
generalization and systematization of the data obtained; it is concluded that intellectual activity is student’s
educational and cognitive, research and creative activity, which enriches student’s cognitive, conceptual,
metacognitive and emotional-evaluative experience, develops his intellectual abilities, forms his cognitive
style. In culture-oriented teaching of Russian, it is possible to promote the formation of students’ declarative
and procedural schemes, to develop semantic, categorical and conceptual abilities of schoolchildren, to teach
arbitrary control of activity, to form student’s worldview attitudes and value orientations as a basis for beliefs.
The results of the study can be used in culture-oriented teaching of the Russian (native) language to design
the process of teaching intellectual activity to schoolchildren. Further research is needed to substantiate and
develop an effective technology that will allow us to implement this kind of teaching. |
| References |
1. Bogomolova, E. S., Languev, K. A., Kotova, N. V., Langueva, E. V. The influence of the digital environment
on the mental capacity and thinking of students. Science and school, no. 1, pp. 123–133, 2022.
DOI: 10.31862/1819-463X-2022-1-123-133. (In Rus.)
2. Mitrofanova, I. I. Clipping thinking: reality and perspectives. Speech technology, no. 1, pp. 67–81,
2019. (In Rus.)
3. Yakupova, A. S. The formation of fixed basic intellectual skills in the process of educational and cognitive
activity among younger schoolchildren. Cand. sci. diss. Birsk, 1998. (In Rus.)
4. Bakhareva, T. I. Formation of intellectual skills of senior schoolchildren in the process of extracurricular
educational activities. Cand. sci. diss. Chelyabinsk, 2004. (In Rus.)
5. Ozolins, R. P. Teaching students of grades VII–VIII intellectual skills of independent cognitive activity
in the process of solving educational problems. Cand. sci. diss. Riga, 1984. (In Rus.)
6. Bakulevskaya, S. S. The formation of the intellectual and creative activity of a high school student in
the process of solving heuristic problems. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Volgograd, 2001. (In Rus.)
7. Lebedeva, S. V. Development of intellectual and creative activity of students in teaching mathematics
at the stage of pre-profile preparation. Cand. sci. diss. Pskov, 2008. (In Rus.)
8. Kholodnaya, M. A., Gelfman, E. G. Developing educational texts as a means of intellectual education
of students. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2016. (In Rus.)
9. Kholodnaya, M. A., Gelfman, E. G. Psychedidactic educational technologies as a factor in the intellectual
education of students. Popular education, no. 8, pp. 111–119, 2014. (In Rus.)
10. Deykina, A. D. Axiological methods of Russian language teaching. Moscow: Moscow State Pedagogical
University, 2019. (In Rus.)
11. Mishatina, N. L. Methodology and technology of speech development of schoolchildren: linguoconceptocentric
approach. Dr. sci. diss. abstr. St. Petersburg, 2010. (In Rus.)
12. Levushkina, O. N. Linguoculturological characteristics of the text in school teaching the Russian
language: theory and practice. Dr. sci. diss. abstr. Moscow, 2014. (In Rus.)
13. Leontiev, A. N. Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat, 1977. (In Rus.)
14. Kholodnaya, M. A. Psychology of conceptual thinking: from conceptual structures to conceptual abilities.
Moscow: Publishing House «Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences», 2012. (In
Rus.)
15. Rubinstein, S. L. Fundamentals of general psychology. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2002. (In Rus.)
16. Brushlinsky, A. V. Selected psychological works. Moscow: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy
of Sciences, 2006. (In Rus.)
17. Galperin, P. Ya. Development of research on the formation of mental actions. Psychological science
in the USSR. Vol. 1. Moscow: Publishing house APN RSFSR, 1959: 441–469. (In Rus.)
18. Mishina, M. M. Structure and types of intellectual activity of the individual. Acmeology, no. 2, pp. 134–
139, 2014. (In Rus.)
19. Voronin, A. N. Intellectual activity: manifestation of intelligence and creativity in real interaction. Psychology.
Journal of the Higher School of Economics, no. 3, pp. 35–58, 2006. (In Rus.)
20. Asmolov, A. G. System-activity approach to the development of new generation standards. Pedagogy,
no. 4, pp. 18–22, 2009. (In Rus.)
21. Ushakov, D. V. Psychology of intelligence and giftedness. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the
Russian Academy of Sciences, 2011. (In Rus.)
22. Guilford, J. P. A Revised structure of intellect. Los Angeles: Calif, 1957. (In Engl.)
23. Li, R. Theory of conceptual intelligence: Thinking, learning and giftedness. Westport, Conn: Praeger,
1996. (In Engl.)
24. Piaget, J. Selected psychological works: Psychology of intelligence. The genesis of the number in
the child. Logic and psychology. Moscow: Enlightenment, 1969. (In Rus.)
25. Randell, W. L. Narrative intelligence and the novelty of our lives. Journal of aging studies, no. 13,
pp. 11–28, 1999. (In Engl.)
26. Sattler, J. M. Assessment of children’s intelligence. Philadelphia; London; Toronto: W. B. Saunders
Company, 1974. (In Engl.)
27. Deykina, A. D. Axiological significance of the methodology of teaching the great and mighty Russian
language. Axiological linguometodics: worldview and value aspects in school and university teaching of the
Russian language, Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference for the anniversary of
Professor A. D. Deykina and her scientific school. Part 1. Moscow: 22–23 March 2019: 11–19. (In Rus.) |
