Article
Article name Potential for Teaching Intellectual Activities to Schoolchildren in Culture-Oriented Linguistic Methodology
Authors Vasilyeva N.V. Candidate of Pedagogy, Vasilyeva-nv1991@yandex.ru
Bibliographic description Vasilyeva N. V. Potential for Teaching Intellectual Activities to Schoolchildren in Culture-Oriented Linguistic Methodology // Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. 2023. Vol. 18, no. 4. Р. 88–97. DOI: 10.21209/2658-7114-2023-18-4-88-97.
Section Theory and methodology of basic and secondary school education
UDK 372.881.161.1
DOI 10.21209/2658-7114-2023-18-4-88-97
Article type Original article
Annotation The system-activity approach as a methodological basis of modern general education updates schoolchildren’s learning in activity. Methods of teaching Russian native language describe special features of forming knowledge, abilities, skills and competences in educational, cognitive, speech and problem-solving, textual and other types of activity. At the same time, culture-oriented linguistic methodology has not sufficiently studied the potential for teaching intellectual activities to schoolchildren. The study aims at identification of this potential. The author has suggested a hypothesis according to which intellectual activity of schoolchildren is cognitive, research and creative, aimed at the development of students’ intelligence. It is also assumed that in culture- oriented teaching of Russian it is possible to teach schoolchildren intellectual activity through the enrichment of their mental experience, development of intellectual abilities, and formation of cognitive style. The methodological basis of the study is the system-activity approach to teaching and the ontological theory of intelligence by M. A. Kholodnaya. Based on the analysis of scientific literature on the topic of the study, generalization and systematization of the data obtained; it is concluded that intellectual activity is student’s educational and cognitive, research and creative activity, which enriches student’s cognitive, conceptual, metacognitive and emotional-evaluative experience, develops his intellectual abilities, forms his cognitive style. In culture-oriented teaching of Russian, it is possible to promote the formation of students’ declarative and procedural schemes, to develop semantic, categorical and conceptual abilities of schoolchildren, to teach arbitrary control of activity, to form student’s worldview attitudes and value orientations as a basis for beliefs. The results of the study can be used in culture-oriented teaching of the Russian (native) language to design the process of teaching intellectual activity to schoolchildren. Further research is needed to substantiate and develop an effective technology that will allow us to implement this kind of teaching.
Key words intelligence, ontological theory of intelligence, intellectual activity of a school student, culture-oriented linguistic methodology, teaching Russian
Article information
References 1. Bogomolova, E. S., Languev, K. A., Kotova, N. V., Langueva, E. V. The influence of the digital environment on the mental capacity and thinking of students. Science and school, no. 1, pp. 123–133, 2022. DOI: 10.31862/1819-463X-2022-1-123-133. (In Rus.) 2. Mitrofanova, I. I. Clipping thinking: reality and perspectives. Speech technology, no. 1, pp. 67–81, 2019. (In Rus.) 3. Yakupova, A. S. The formation of fixed basic intellectual skills in the process of educational and cognitive activity among younger schoolchildren. Cand. sci. diss. Birsk, 1998. (In Rus.) 4. Bakhareva, T. I. Formation of intellectual skills of senior schoolchildren in the process of extracurricular educational activities. Cand. sci. diss. Chelyabinsk, 2004. (In Rus.) 5. Ozolins, R. P. Teaching students of grades VII–VIII intellectual skills of independent cognitive activity in the process of solving educational problems. Cand. sci. diss. Riga, 1984. (In Rus.) 6. Bakulevskaya, S. S. The formation of the intellectual and creative activity of a high school student in the process of solving heuristic problems. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Volgograd, 2001. (In Rus.) 7. Lebedeva, S. V. Development of intellectual and creative activity of students in teaching mathematics at the stage of pre-profile preparation. Cand. sci. diss. Pskov, 2008. (In Rus.) 8. Kholodnaya, M. A., Gelfman, E. G. Developing educational texts as a means of intellectual education of students. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2016. (In Rus.) 9. Kholodnaya, M. A., Gelfman, E. G. Psychedidactic educational technologies as a factor in the intellectual education of students. Popular education, no. 8, pp. 111–119, 2014. (In Rus.) 10. Deykina, A. D. Axiological methods of Russian language teaching. Moscow: Moscow State Pedagogical University, 2019. (In Rus.) 11. Mishatina, N. L. Methodology and technology of speech development of schoolchildren: linguoconceptocentric approach. Dr. sci. diss. abstr. St. Petersburg, 2010. (In Rus.) 12. Levushkina, O. N. Linguoculturological characteristics of the text in school teaching the Russian language: theory and practice. Dr. sci. diss. abstr. Moscow, 2014. (In Rus.) 13. Leontiev, A. N. Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat, 1977. (In Rus.) 14. Kholodnaya, M. A. Psychology of conceptual thinking: from conceptual structures to conceptual abilities. Moscow: Publishing House «Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences», 2012. (In Rus.) 15. Rubinstein, S. L. Fundamentals of general psychology. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2002. (In Rus.) 16. Brushlinsky, A. V. Selected psychological works. Moscow: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2006. (In Rus.) 17. Galperin, P. Ya. Development of research on the formation of mental actions. Psychological science in the USSR. Vol. 1. Moscow: Publishing house APN RSFSR, 1959: 441–469. (In Rus.) 18. Mishina, M. M. Structure and types of intellectual activity of the individual. Acmeology, no. 2, pp. 134– 139, 2014. (In Rus.) 19. Voronin, A. N. Intellectual activity: manifestation of intelligence and creativity in real interaction. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, no. 3, pp. 35–58, 2006. (In Rus.) 20. Asmolov, A. G. System-activity approach to the development of new generation standards. Pedagogy, no. 4, pp. 18–22, 2009. (In Rus.) 21. Ushakov, D. V. Psychology of intelligence and giftedness. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2011. (In Rus.) 22. Guilford, J. P. A Revised structure of intellect. Los Angeles: Calif, 1957. (In Engl.) 23. Li, R. Theory of conceptual intelligence: Thinking, learning and giftedness. Westport, Conn: Praeger, 1996. (In Engl.) 24. Piaget, J. Selected psychological works: Psychology of intelligence. The genesis of the number in the child. Logic and psychology. Moscow: Enlightenment, 1969. (In Rus.) 25. Randell, W. L. Narrative intelligence and the novelty of our lives. Journal of aging studies, no. 13, pp. 11–28, 1999. (In Engl.) 26. Sattler, J. M. Assessment of children’s intelligence. Philadelphia; London; Toronto: W. B. Saunders Company, 1974. (In Engl.) 27. Deykina, A. D. Axiological significance of the methodology of teaching the great and mighty Russian language. Axiological linguometodics: worldview and value aspects in school and university teaching of the Russian language, Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference for the anniversary of Professor A. D. Deykina and her scientific school. Part 1. Moscow: 22–23 March 2019: 11–19. (In Rus.)
Full articlePotential for Teaching Intellectual Activities to Schoolchildren in Culture-Oriented Linguistic Methodology