| Annotation |
Using the example of educational methods of the Faculty of Philology of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (Journalism), the article actualizes two problems – the formation of communicative and cognitive space in the student environment, which includes a range of meta-communicative and metacognitive mechanisms, and the methods used by teachers to teach students in the transfer of new knowledge in order to learn the future journalists professional skills and competencies. One of the most difficult aspects of learning is considered as a model, namely, the process of evolutionary development of critical thinking and the accumulation by students of their creative potential, expressed in the semantics of media text. The basis of the author’s method analyzed in the article, verified over the years, is the atmosphere of trust built between the teacher and students from the first years of training. This method motivates, on the one hand, yesterday’s schoolchildren to learn knowledge codes, professional techniques of lexical expressiveness, on the other hand, it accelerates the process of immersion in creativity, and forms independence in choosing a topic and genre of journalistic material. Insufficient attention is paid to the creation of a communicative-cognitive space in scientific discourse, while such a comfortable environment serves as the basis for the formation of a creatively thinking and creative personality, open to the assimilation of new cognitions, the knowledge of the objective world.
|
| References |
1. Gavrilova, A. V. Features of communication of generation Z. Intellectual resources for regional development, no. 2, pp. 28–31, 2016. (In Rus.)
2. Gurevich, L. S. The cognitive space of metacommunications: the basics of pragmasemantic study: abstract dis. ... doc. philol. sciences. M., 2011. (In Rus.)
3. Egorova, I. G. Personality-oriented communication as a process of constructing a joint cognitive space: dis. cand. psychol. sciences. M., 2001. (In Rus.)
4. Egorova, M. A. “Cognitive space” and its relationship with the concepts of “mental space”, “cognitive base”, concentration sphere, “picture of the world”. Vestnik ISLU, no. 3, pp. 61–68, 2012. (In Rus.)
5. Karasik, V. I. Language personality as a subject of study. Bulletin of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, no. 8, pp. 109–115, 2011. (In Rus.)
6. Krasnykh, V. V. Virtual reality or real virtuality? (Man. Consciousness. Communication). M: Dialog-
MSU, 1998. (In Rus.)
7. Loginova, O. K., Egorova, U. G., Berdieva, A. Sh. Features of communicative tolerance of students of different professional orientations. World of science, culture, education, no. 1, pp. 286–290, 2018. (In Rus.)
8. Prohorov, Yu. E. National sociocultural stereotypes of verbal communication and their role in teaching Russian to foreigners. M: Publishing house of LCI, 2008. (In Rus.)
9. Urazova, S. L. Digital Age: Creativity VS. Creation. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, pp. 650–659, no. 22, 2017. (In Rus.)
10. Filipenok, S. A. The concept of personal knowledge of M. Polani in the light of current philosophical problems: new epistemological approaches. Vestnik TSPU, no. 5, pp. 92–98, 2013. (In Rus.)
11. Hall, E. T. The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday,1966. (In Engl.)
12. Newby, G. B. Cognitive Space and Information Space. Journal of the American Society for Informational Science and Technology Archive, pp. 1026–1048, vol. 52, 2001. (In Engl.)
13. Peverelli, P. J. Cognitive Space (A Social Cognitive Approach to Sino-Western Cooperation). Delft : Eduron, 2000. (In Engl.)
14. Werbach, K., Hunter D. For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. Wharton Digital Press, 2012. (In Engl.) |
