| Article |
|---|
| Article name |
Symbolic Capital of Power in Technologies of Constructing National Identity |
| Authors |
Luk’yanova N.A.Doctor of Philosophy kir712@yandex.ru |
| Bibliographic description |
|
| Section |
|
| DOI |
|
| UDK |
304.5. |
| Article type |
|
| Annotation |
The resources of symbolic power capital in national identity process are symbolic tools of
culture that let not only describe the cultural processes but understand them as well. So, they are to
be analyzed as a cultural technology. The article analyzes the processes of national identity formation
from the perspective of the dominant symbolic intentions within the concept. The analysis reveals
the potential of the symbolic power capital in the technology of constructing national identity. The
analysis is hold in tradition of A. Whitehead’s philosophy followed by his student S. Langer. They
understand power capital as a vital power need for “national identity” that is seen in tendency to
gain its own identity symbols. The author underlines inconsistency of the technologies used to form
the symbolic power capital in constructing national identity as “image for oneself” and “image for
others”. The analysis of national identity process proves that such intentions as “image for oneself”
and “image for others” are essential for understanding the importance of symbols for constructing
national identity.
|
| Key words |
power, symbol, sign, symbolic capital, national identity, social construction, image
for oneself, image for others. |
| Article information |
|
| References |
1. Abalmasova N. E., Pain Je. A. Opora na simvoly v formirovanii regional’noj identichnosti //
Vestn. In-ta geografii RAN. 2011. URL: http://www.pandia.ru/text/77/152/9679.php (data
obrashhenija: 04.01.2013).
2. Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshhestva. Razmyshlenija ob istokah i rasprostranenii
nacionalizma. M., 2001. URL: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Sociolog/anders/index.php
(data obrashhenija: 10.01.2013).
3. Berger P., Lukman T. Social’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po sociologii znanija. URL:
http://socioline.ru/pages/p-berger-t-lukman-sotsialnoe-konstruirovanie-realnosti (data obrashhenija:
10.01.2013).
4. Burd’e P. Social’noe prostranstvo i simvolicheskaja vlast’//Sociologicheskoe prostranstvo
P. Burd’e. URL: http://bourdieu.name/content/socialnoe-prostranstvo-i-simvolicheskaja-vlast (data
obrashhenija: 16.04.2011).
5. Burd’e P. O simvolicheskoj vlasti // Burd’e P’er. Sociologija social’nogo prostranstva.
M.: In-t jeksperimental’noj sociologii; SPb.: Aletejja, 2007. S. 87–96. URL: http://www.ec-dejavu.
net/p-2/Power_Bourdieu.html (data obrashhenija: 27.01.2013).
6. Burd’e P. Duh gosudarstva: genezis i struktura bjurokraticheskogo polja // Sociologija
social’nogo prostranstva. M.: In-t jeksperimental’noj sociologii. SPb.: Aletejja, 2007. 288 s.
7. Gadzhiev K. S. Nacional’naja identichnost’: konceptual’nyj aspekt // Vopr. filosofii. 2011.
№ 10. S. 3–16. URL: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=400 (data
obrashhenija: 15.01.2013).
8. Kassirer Je. Izbrannoe. Opyt o cheloveke / per. s nem. B. Vimer [i dr.]; otv. red. L. T. Mil’skaja.
M.: Gardariki, 1998. 779 s.
9. Langer S. Filosofija v novom kljuche: issledovanie simvoliki razuma, rituala i iskusstva /
per. s angl. M.: Respublika, 2000. 287 s. URL: http://ru.philosophy.kiev.ua/library/langer/ (data
obrashhenija: 25.06.2011).
10. Mamford L. Mif mashiny. Tehnika i razvitie chelovechestva / per. s angl. T. Azarkovicha,
B. Skuratova. M.: Logos, 2001. 408 s.
11. Nemeckij vopros i problema formirovanija nacional’noj identichnosti. URL: http://mirpolitika.
ru/2594-nemeckiy-vopros-i-problema-formirovaniya-nemeckoy-nacionalnoy-identichnosti.
html (data obrashhenija: 21.01.2013).
12. Uajthed A. N. Simvolizm, ego smysl i vozdejstvie. Tomsk: Vodolej, 1999. 64 s.
13. Shirshova I. Osnovnye ponjatija koncepcii P. Burd’e. URL: http://www.situation.ru/app/j_
art_632.htm (data obrashhenija: 21.01.2013). |
| Full article | Symbolic Capital of Power in Technologies of Constructing National Identity |
