| References |
1. Baklushina, I. V. Organization and control of students’ independent work. Bulletin of the Siberian State
Industrial University. no. 4, pp. 62–65, 2014. (In Rus.)
2. Grigorenko, S. E., Fisunova, N. V., Platoshina, V. V. Rating system as a means of assessing the quality
of education at a university. Bulletin of the Tver State University, no. 2, pp. 77–83, 2016. (In Rus.)
3. Gulevich, T. M. Independent student work as a development factor. Pedagogical laboratory, no. 1,
pp. 24–29, 2015. (In Rus.)
4. Gusyatnikov, V. N., Bezrukov, A. I., Sokolova, T. N., Kayukova, I. V., Pogozhilskaya, G. G. Methods
and models for assessing the quality of education based on the competency-based approach. Saratov: SPPrint,
2016. (In Rus.)
5. Dugarova, D. Ts., Kalinina, L. I. The quality of education as a direction of activity of student self-government
bodies. Uchenye zapiski Zabaykalsky State University, no. 6, pp. 48–54, 2014. (In Rus.)
6. Koksharov, A. V. Introduction to the mechanisms for assessing the quality of education at a university.
Problems of education quality management, Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference.
Penza: 21–22 November: 2018: 56–58. (In Rus.)
7. Korotaeva, E. V. On the readiness and ability of future teachers to professional interaction. Uchenye
zapiski ZabGU, no. 6, pp. 30–36, 2016. (In Rus.)
8. Kustov, P. V. Assessment of the quality of the education system at an increased level of professional
training of a specialist. Scientific and practical research, no. 4, pp. 40–43, 2017. (In Rus.)
9. Kucherova, T. V. Student’s independent work as one of the components of the educational process.
Bulletin of the Siberian Institute of Business and Information Technology, no. 4, pp. 64–66, 2012. (In Rus.)
10. Mikhailova, S. N. Independent work in the educational process: a view from students. Bulletin of
Kazan Technological University, no. 5, pp. 343–346, 2013. (In Rus.)
11. Morozova, E. Yu., Kamenetskaya, N. V. Increasing the effectiveness of students’ independent work.
Modern education: content, technology, quality, t. 2, pp. 8–10, 2017. (In Rus.)
12. Pustovalova, N. I., Kushumbaev, A. B., Fedyaeva, M. V. The rating system evaluates academic
achievement as a condition for the development of motivation for students’ educational activities. Vector of
Science, Tolyatti State University, no. 1, pp. 162–166, 2015. (In Rus.)
13. Serebrovskaya, N. E. Monitoring as a means of assessing the quality of the educational environment
of the university. New in psychological and pedagogical research, no. 4, pp. 30–37, 2017. (In Rus.)
14. Sukhorukova, D. V. Assessment of the quality of higher education: direct approaches and international
rating systems. Higher education today, no. 9, pp. 49–53, 2018. (In Rus.)
15. Suschenko, A. D., Sandler, D. G. How students participate in the mechanisms of “Feedback”: systematic
research practice in UrFU. University management: practice and analysis, no. 2, pp. 176–191, 2017.
(In Rus.)
16. Trubilin, A. I., Grigorash, O. V. On improving the quality of student training. Alma mater (Bulletin of
higher education), no. 11, pp. 75–78, 2016. (In Rus.)
17. Tuzhilina, E. N., Gorelkina, T. L., Grigoryants, E. Yu., Tsarkova, M. F., Kolesnikova, T. P. Assessment
of graduate satisfaction with the quality of education at the university. Innovative technologies in improving
the quality of education. Materials of the International scientific and methodological conference. Blagoveshchensk:
DGAU, 2014: 164–170. (In Rus.)
18. Fominykh, G. A., Drapkina, G. S. Assessment of the quality of student learning at the university. Food
Innovation and Biotechnology. Materials Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference.
Kemerovo, 2016: 424–426. (In Rus.) |
